INTRODUCTION: Our goal was to develop cut points for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), tau PET, flouro-deoxyglucose (FDG) PET, and MRI cortical thickness. METHODS: We examined five methods for determining cut points. RESULTS: The reliable worsening method produced a cut point only for amyloid PET. The specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of cognitively impaired versus young clinically normal (CN) methods labeled the most people abnormal and all gave similar cut points for tau PET, FDG PET, and cortical thickness. Cut points defined using the accuracy of cognitively impaired versus age-matched CN method labeled fewer people abnormal. DISCUSSION: In the future, we will use a single cut point for amyloid PET (standardized uptake value ratio, 1.42; centiloid, 19) based on the reliable worsening cut point method. We will base lenient cut points for tau PET, FDG PET, and cortical thickness on the accuracy of cognitively impaired versus young CN method and base conservative cut points on the accuracy of cognitively impaired versus age-matched CN method.
INTRODUCTION: Our goal was to develop cut points for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), tau PET, flouro-deoxyglucose (FDG) PET, and MRI cortical thickness. METHODS: We examined five methods for determining cut points. RESULTS: The reliable worsening method produced a cut point only for amyloid PET. The specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of cognitively impaired versus young clinically normal (CN) methods labeled the most people abnormal and all gave similar cut points for tau PET, FDG PET, and cortical thickness. Cut points defined using the accuracy of cognitively impaired versus age-matched CN method labeled fewer people abnormal. DISCUSSION: In the future, we will use a single cut point for amyloid PET (standardized uptake value ratio, 1.42; centiloid, 19) based on the reliable worsening cut point method. We will base lenient cut points for tau PET, FDG PET, and cortical thickness on the accuracy of cognitively impaired versus young CN method and base conservative cut points on the accuracy of cognitively impaired versus age-matched CN method.
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Marilyn S Albert; David S Knopman; Guy M McKhann; Reisa A Sperling; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Creighton H Phelps Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Nicolas Villain; Gaël Chételat; Blandine Grassiot; Pierrick Bourgeat; Gareth Jones; Kathryn A Ellis; David Ames; Ralph N Martins; Francis Eustache; Olivier Salvado; Colin L Masters; Christopher C Rowe; Victor L Villemagne Journal: Brain Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Laura E M Wisse; Nirali Butala; Sandhitsu R Das; Christos Davatzikos; Bradford C Dickerson; Sanjeev N Vaishnavi; Paul A Yushkevich; David A Wolk Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Victor L Villemagne; Kerryn E Pike; Gaël Chételat; Kathryn A Ellis; Rachel S Mulligan; Pierrick Bourgeat; Uwe Ackermann; Gareth Jones; Cassandra Szoeke; Olivier Salvado; Ralph Martins; Graeme O'Keefe; Chester A Mathis; William E Klunk; David Ames; Colin L Masters; Christopher C Rowe Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: E C Mormino; J T Kluth; C M Madison; G D Rabinovici; S L Baker; B L Miller; R A Koeppe; C A Mathis; M W Weiner; W J Jagust Journal: Brain Date: 2008-11-28 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Michelle M Mielke; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; David S Knopman; Val J Lowe; Rosebud O Roberts; Yonas E Geda; Dana M Swenson-Dravis; Bradley F Boeve; Matthew L Senjem; Prashanthi Vemuri; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: William E Klunk; Robert A Koeppe; Julie C Price; Tammie L Benzinger; Michael D Devous; William J Jagust; Keith A Johnson; Chester A Mathis; Davneet Minhas; Michael J Pontecorvo; Christopher C Rowe; Daniel M Skovronsky; Mark A Mintun Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Kerryn E Pike; Greg Savage; Victor L Villemagne; Steven Ng; Simon A Moss; Paul Maruff; Chester A Mathis; William E Klunk; Colin L Masters; Christopher C Rowe Journal: Brain Date: 2007-10-10 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Michael Schöll; Samuel N Lockhart; Daniel R Schonhaut; James P O'Neil; Mustafa Janabi; Rik Ossenkoppele; Suzanne L Baker; Jacob W Vogel; Jamie Faria; Henry D Schwimmer; Gil D Rabinovici; William J Jagust Journal: Neuron Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Keith A Johnson; Aaron Schultz; Rebecca A Betensky; J Alex Becker; Jorge Sepulcre; Dorene Rentz; Elizabeth Mormino; Jasmeer Chhatwal; Rebecca Amariglio; Kate Papp; Gad Marshall; Mark Albers; Samantha Mauro; Lesley Pepin; Jonathan Alverio; Kelly Judge; Marlie Philiossaint; Timothy Shoup; Daniel Yokell; Bradford Dickerson; Teresa Gomez-Isla; Bradley Hyman; Neil Vasdev; Reisa Sperling Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Sebastian Palmqvist; Pontus Tideman; Nicholas Cullen; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Jeffery L Dage; Erik Stomrud; Shorena Janelidze; Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren; Oskar Hansson Journal: Nat Med Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Maria Vassilaki; Jeremiah A Aakre; Jeremy A Syrjanen; Michelle M Mielke; Yonas E Geda; Walter K Kremers; Mary M Machulda; Rabe E Alhurani; Sara C Staubo; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Val J Lowe; Clifford R Jack; Rosebud O Roberts Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Michelle M Mielke; Clinton E Hagen; Jing Xu; Xiyun Chai; Prashanthi Vemuri; Val J Lowe; David C Airey; David S Knopman; Rosebud O Roberts; Mary M Machulda; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; Jeffrey L Dage Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: David S Knopman; Samantha Budd Haeberlein; Maria C Carrillo; James A Hendrix; Geoff Kerchner; Richard Margolin; Paul Maruff; David S Miller; Gary Tong; Maria B Tome; Melissa E Murray; Peter T Nelson; Mary Sano; Niklas Mattsson; David L Sultzer; Thomas J Montine; Clifford R Jack; Hartmuth Kolb; Ronald C Petersen; Prashanthi Vemuri; Megan Zoschg Canniere; Julie A Schneider; Susan M Resnick; Gary Romano; Argonde Corien van Harten; David A Wolk; Lisa J Bain; Eric Siemers Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Katerina A Tetzloff; Joseph R Duffy; Heather M Clark; Rene L Utianski; Edythe A Strand; Mary M Machulda; Hugo Botha; Peter R Martin; Christopher G Schwarz; Matthew L Senjem; Robert I Reid; Jeffrey L Gunter; Anthony J Spychalla; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; Val J Lowe; Keith A Josephs; Jennifer L Whitwell Journal: Brain Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Nicolai Franzmeier; Anna Rubinski; Julia Neitzel; Yeshin Kim; Alexander Damm; Duk L Na; Hee Jin Kim; Chul Hyoung Lyoo; Hana Cho; Sofia Finsterwalder; Marco Duering; Sang Won Seo; Michael Ewers Journal: Brain Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Alma Ghirelli; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Stephen D Weigand; Heather M Clark; Farwa Ali; Hugo Botha; Joseph R Duffy; Rene L Utianski; Marina Buciuc; Melissa E Murray; Sydney A Labuzan; Anthony J Spychalla; Nha Trang Thu Pham; Christopher G Schwarz; Matthew L Senjem; Mary M Machulda; Matthew Baker; Rosa Rademakers; Massimo Filippi; Clifford R Jack; Val J Lowe; Joseph E Parisi; Dennis W Dickson; Keith A Josephs; Jennifer L Whitwell Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2020-09-12 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Vijay K Ramanan; Scott A Przybelski; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Anna M Castillo; Val J Lowe; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Robert I Reid; David S Knopman; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; Prashanthi Vemuri Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Michael J Properzi; Rachel F Buckley; Jasmeer P Chhatwal; Michael C Donohue; Cristina Lois; Elizabeth C Mormino; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Aaron P Schultz Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-11-17 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Xi Chen; Kaitlin E Cassady; Jenna N Adams; Theresa M Harrison; Suzanne L Baker; William J Jagust Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 6.167