OBJECTIVES: Secondary prevention trials in subjects with preclinical Alzheimer disease may require documentation of brain amyloidosis. The identification of inexpensive and noninvasive screening variables that can identify individuals who have significant amyloid accumulation would reduce screening costs. METHODS: A total of 483 cognitively normal (CN) individuals, aged 70-92 years, from the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, underwent Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)-PET imaging. Logistic regression determined whether age, sex, APOE genotype, family history, or cognitive performance was associated with odds of a PiB retention ratio >1.4 and >1.5. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) evaluated the discrimination between PiB-positive and -negative subjects. For each characteristic, we determined the number needed to screen in each age group (70-79 and 80-89) to identify 100 participants with PiB >1.4 or >1.5. RESULTS: A total of 211 (44%) individuals had PiB >1.4 and 151 (31%) >1.5. In univariate and multivariate models, discrimination was modest (AUROC ∼0.6-0.7). Multivariately, age and APOE best predicted odds of PiB >1.4 and >1.5. Subjective memory complaints were similar to cognitive test performance in predicting PiB >1.5. Indicators of PiB positivity varied with age. Screening APOE ε4 carriers alone reduced the number needed to screen to enroll 100 subjects with PIB >1.5 by 48% in persons aged 70-79 and 33% in those aged 80-89. CONCLUSIONS: Age and APOE genotype are useful predictors of the likelihood of significant amyloid accumulation, but discrimination is modest. Nonetheless, these results suggest that inexpensive and noninvasive measures could significantly reduce the number of CN individuals needed to screen to enroll a given number of amyloid-positive subjects.
OBJECTIVES: Secondary prevention trials in subjects with preclinical Alzheimer disease may require documentation of brain amyloidosis. The identification of inexpensive and noninvasive screening variables that can identify individuals who have significant amyloid accumulation would reduce screening costs. METHODS: A total of 483 cognitively normal (CN) individuals, aged 70-92 years, from the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, underwent Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)-PET imaging. Logistic regression determined whether age, sex, APOE genotype, family history, or cognitive performance was associated with odds of a PiB retention ratio >1.4 and >1.5. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) evaluated the discrimination between PiB-positive and -negative subjects. For each characteristic, we determined the number needed to screen in each age group (70-79 and 80-89) to identify 100 participants with PiB >1.4 or >1.5. RESULTS: A total of 211 (44%) individuals had PiB >1.4 and 151 (31%) >1.5. In univariate and multivariate models, discrimination was modest (AUROC ∼0.6-0.7). Multivariately, age and APOE best predicted odds of PiB >1.4 and >1.5. Subjective memory complaints were similar to cognitive test performance in predicting PiB >1.5. Indicators of PiB positivity varied with age. Screening APOE ε4 carriers alone reduced the number needed to screen to enroll 100 subjects with PIB >1.5 by 48% in persons aged 70-79 and 33% in those aged 80-89. CONCLUSIONS: Age and APOE genotype are useful predictors of the likelihood of significant amyloid accumulation, but discrimination is modest. Nonetheless, these results suggest that inexpensive and noninvasive measures could significantly reduce the number of CN individuals needed to screen to enroll a given number of amyloid-positive subjects.
Authors: Brian J Lopresti; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; Jessica A Hoge; Scott K Ziolko; Xueling Lu; Carolyn C Meltzer; Kurt Schimmel; Nicholas D Tsopelas; Steven T DeKosky; Julie C Price Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: M A Mintun; G N Larossa; Y I Sheline; C S Dence; S Y Lee; R H Mach; W E Klunk; C A Mathis; S T DeKosky; J C Morris Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-08-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Christopher C Rowe; Kathryn A Ellis; Miroslava Rimajova; Pierrick Bourgeat; Kerryn E Pike; Gareth Jones; Jurgen Fripp; Henri Tochon-Danguy; Laurence Morandeau; Graeme O'Keefe; Roger Price; Parnesh Raniga; Peter Robins; Oscar Acosta; Nat Lenzo; Cassandra Szoeke; Olivier Salvado; Richard Head; Ralph Martins; Colin L Masters; David Ames; Victor L Villemagne Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2010-05-15 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Julie C Price; William E Klunk; Brian J Lopresti; Xueling Lu; Jessica A Hoge; Scott K Ziolko; Daniel P Holt; Carolyn C Meltzer; Steven T DeKosky; Chester A Mathis Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: William E Klunk; Henry Engler; Agneta Nordberg; Yanming Wang; Gunnar Blomqvist; Daniel P Holt; Mats Bergström; Irina Savitcheva; Guo-feng Huang; Sergio Estrada; Birgitta Ausén; Manik L Debnath; Julien Barletta; Julie C Price; Johan Sandell; Brian J Lopresti; Anders Wall; Pernilla Koivisto; Gunnar Antoni; Chester A Mathis; Bengt Långström Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: G Li; I Sokal; J F Quinn; J B Leverenz; M Brodey; G D Schellenberg; J A Kaye; M A Raskind; J Zhang; E R Peskind; T J Montine Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-08-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Leslie M Shaw; Magdalena Korecka; Christopher M Clark; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2007-03-09 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Myria Petrou; Ben A Dwamena; Bradley R Foerster; Mark P MacEachern; Nicolaas I Bohnen; Martijn Ltm Müller; Roger L Albin; Kirk A Frey Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Laura A Rabin; Colette M Smart; Paul K Crane; Rebecca E Amariglio; Lorin M Berman; Mercé Boada; Rachel F Buckley; Gaël Chételat; Bruno Dubois; Kathryn A Ellis; Katherine A Gifford; Angela L Jefferson; Frank Jessen; Mindy J Katz; Richard B Lipton; Tobias Luck; Paul Maruff; Michelle M Mielke; José Luis Molinuevo; Farnia Naeem; Audrey Perrotin; Ronald C Petersen; Lorena Rami; Barry Reisberg; Dorene M Rentz; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Shannon L Risacher; Octavio Rodriguez; Perminder S Sachdev; Andrew J Saykin; Melissa J Slavin; Beth E Snitz; Reisa A Sperling; Caroline Tandetnik; Wiesje M van der Flier; Michael Wagner; Steffen Wolfsgruber; Sietske A M Sikkes Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Neelesh K Nadkarni; Oscar L Lopez; Subashan Perera; Stephanie A Studenski; Beth E Snitz; Kirk I Erickson; Chester A Mathis; Robert D Nebes; Mark Redfern; William E Klunk Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Rachel F Buckley; Elizabeth C Mormino; Rebecca E Amariglio; Michael J Properzi; Jennifer S Rabin; Yen Ying Lim; Kathryn V Papp; Heidi I L Jacobs; Samantha Burnham; Bernard J Hanseeuw; Vincent Doré; Annette Dobson; Colin L Masters; Michael Waller; Christopher C Rowe; Paul Maruff; Michael C Donohue; Dorene M Rentz; Dylan Kirn; Trey Hedden; Jasmeer Chhatwal; Aaron P Schultz; Keith A Johnson; Victor L Villemagne; Reisa A Sperling Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Terry M Therneau; Val J Lowe; David S Knopman; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; David T Jones; Kejal Kantarci; Mary M Machulda; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Prashanthi Vemuri; Denise A Reyes; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: M Edip Gurol; Anand Viswanathan; Christopher Gidicsin; Trey Hedden; Sergi Martinez-Ramirez; Andrew Dumas; Anastasia Vashkevich; Alison M Ayres; Eitan Auriel; Ellis van Etten; Alex Becker; Jeremy Carmasin; Kristin Schwab; Jonathan Rosand; Keith A Johnson; Steven M Greenberg Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Sajjad Fouladvand; Michelle M Mielke; Maria Vassilaki; Jennifer St Sauver; Ronald C Petersen; Sunghwan Sohn Journal: Proceedings (IEEE Int Conf Bioinformatics Biomed) Date: 2020-02-06