Literature DB >> 27697244

Clinical outcomes of a new extended range of vision intraocular lens: International Multicenter Concerto Study.

Béatrice Cochener.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the clinical outcomes after implantation of an extended range of vision intraocular lens (IOL), the Tecnis Symfony, in a routine clinical setting.
SETTING: Forty clinical sites in Finland, France, Germany, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
DESIGN: Prospective case series.
METHODS: The study comprised 411 patients who had bilateral implantation of the extended range of vision IOL, with intended micro-monovision in 1 group (monovision group) and intended emmetropia in the other group (non-monovision group). Visual acuity, spectacle independence, patient and surgeon satisfaction, and photic phenomena were analyzed during the 4- to 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS: The monovision group comprised 112 patients and the non-monovision group, 299 patients. The mean decimal uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), and near (UNVA) visual acuities were 0.95, 0.81, and 0.69, respectively, 4 to 6 months postoperatively. Significantly better UIVA (P = .003) and UNVA (P = .011) were found in the monovision group than in the non-monovision group. Spectacle independence was high, with 14.4% of eyes requiring reading spectacles frequently. More than 90% of patients reported no or mild halos, glare, starbursts, or other photic phenomena. Patient satisfaction scores (median) for distance, intermediate, and near vision were 9.0, 10.0, and 8.0, respectively. The satisfaction score for near vision increased to 9.0 in the monovision group. More than 91% of patients said they would recommend the same procedure to their friends and family.
CONCLUSION: The extended range of vision IOL provided successful visual restoration across all distances after cataract surgery, with a minimal level of disturbing photic phenomena and high levels of patient satisfaction. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Cochener is a clinical investigator for Revision Optics, Inc., Horus Vision LLC, Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Théa Pharma GmbH, and Santen, Inc.; she is also a consultant to Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Théa Pharma GmbH, and Santen, Inc.
Copyright © 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27697244     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  46 in total

1.  Which intraocular lens would ophthalmologists choose for themselves?

Authors:  Hercules D Logothetis; Robert S Feder
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Visual performance of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens for treatment selection.

Authors:  Thomas Kohnen; Myriam Böhm; Eva Hemkeppler; Sabrina Schönbrunn; Nina DeLorenzo; Kerstin Petermann; Michael Herzog
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Model of the light sword intraocular lens: in-vitro comparative studies.

Authors:  Krzysztof Petelczyc; Andrzej Kolodziejczyk; Narcyz Błocki; Anna Byszewska; Zbigniew Jaroszewicz; Karol Kakarenko; Katarzyna Kołacz; Michał Miler; Alejandro Mira-Agudelo; Walter Torres-Sepúlveda; Marek Rękas
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Comparative analysis of visual outcomes, reading skills, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction with two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses and an extended range of vision intraocular lens.

Authors:  Rita Mencucci; Eleonora Favuzza; Orsola Caporossi; Alfonso Savastano; Stanislao Rizzo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Cost-Effectiveness of Presbyopia Correction Among Seven Strategies of Bilateral Cataract Surgery Based on a Prospective Single-Blind Two-Center Trial in China.

Authors:  Qianqian Lan; Yiyun Liu; Fan Xu; Min Li; Yaxin Li; Tingting Yang; Tong Sun; Gang Yao; Baikai Ma; Liyuan Tao; Xin Xiao; Xing Lin Feng; Siming Zeng; Hong Qi
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-09-07

6.  Difference in Quality of Vision Outcome among Extended Depth of Focus, Bifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation.

Authors:  Chen-Cheng Chao; Hung-Yuan Lin; Chia-Yi Lee; Elsa Lin-Chin Mai; Ie-Bin Lian; Chao-Kai Chang
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-28

7.  Achromatic doublet intraocular lens for full aberration correction.

Authors:  Enrique J Fernandez; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Implantation in Eyes After Corneal Refractive Laser Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Yingying Hong; Xianfang Rong; Yinghong Ji
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-11

9.  Clinical outcomes with a low add multifocal and an extended depth of focus intraocular lenses both implanted with mini-monovision.

Authors:  Mehmet Orkun Sevik; Semra Akkaya Turhan; Ebru Toker
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.456

10.  Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  André Lins de Medeiros; André Gustavo de Araújo Rolim; Antonio Francisco Pimenta Motta; Bruna Vieira Ventura; César Vilar; Mário Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves; Pedro Carlos Carricondo; Wilson Takashi Hida
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.