Literature DB >> 27696210

Investigation of noise sources for digital radiography systems.

Lutfi Ergun1, Turan Olgar2.   

Abstract

The performance of digital radiography systems can be evaluated in terms of spatial resolution and noise. Noise plays an important role in the achievable image quality for detecting small and low-contrast structures in digital images created by these systems. Our aim in this study was to investigate the noise sources both in the spatial and frequency domain for three digital radiography systems, one digital fluoroscopy system, and one digital mammography system, and to obtain information about the effective operating dose range of these detectors. Noise evaluation in the spatial domain was done with the relative standard deviation-detector air kerma relationship evaluation method. The characterization of the noise in the spatial domain gives information about the types of noise, but does not give information about the noise power distribution in frequency space. Therefore, noise evaluation in the frequency domain was carried out by noise power spectrum measurement. The observed dominant noise component at lower detector doses was electronic noise for the digital mammography system, whereas structured noise was observed to make up nearly half of the total noise at higher detector doses for one of the digital radiography systems. The structured noise component was increased by use of a grid in these systems, independent of the grid ratio and grid frequency, but this increase was lower for higher grid frequencies. Furthermore, the structured noise coefficient was decreased with gain and offset calibrations. The five systems which we evaluated behaved as a quantum noise limited for clinically used detector doses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Detector air kerma; Noise; Noise power spectrum; Standard deviation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27696210     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-016-0381-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  13 in total

1.  On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.

Authors:  Giovanni Borasi; Andrea Nitrosi; Paolo Ferrari; Davide Tassoni
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  On the noise variance of a digital mammography system.

Authors:  Arthur Burgess
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital x-ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set.

Authors:  Ulrich Neitzel; Susanne Günther-Kohfahl; Giovanni Borasi; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Comparison of different commercial FFDM units by means of physical characterization and contrast-detail analysis.

Authors:  Stefano Rivetti; Nico Lanconelli; Renato Campanini; Marco Bertolini; Gianni Borasi; Andrea Nitrosi; Claudio Danielli; Lidia Angelini; Stefania Maggi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; Ehsan Samei; Nicole T Ranger; Ying Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Effective DQE (eDQE) and speed of digital radiographic systems: an experimental methodology.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Nicole T Ranger; Alistair MacKenzie; Ian D Honey; James T Dobbins; Carl E Ravin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  An alternative method for noise analysis using pixel variance as part of quality control procedures on digital mammography systems.

Authors:  R Bouwman; K Young; B Lazzari; V Ravaglia; M Broeders; R van Engen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.

Authors:  N W Marshall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-09-03       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.

Authors:  N W Marshall; P Monnin; H Bosmans; F O Bochud; F R Verdun
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector.

Authors:  Robert S Saunders; Ehsan Samei; Jonathan L Jesneck; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  1 in total

1.  Influence of the incorporation of a lead foil to intraoral digital receptors on the image quality and root fracture diagnosis.

Authors:  Amanda Farias Gomes; Yuri Nejaim; Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Deborah Queiroz Freitas
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.419

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.