Literature DB >> 15377085

Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital x-ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set.

Ulrich Neitzel1, Susanne Günther-Kohfahl, Giovanni Borasi, Ehsan Samei.   

Abstract

The detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of an x-ray digital imaging detector was determined independently by the three participants of this study, using the same data set consisting of edge and flat field images. The aim was to assess the possible variation in DQE originating from established, but slightly different, data processing methods used by different groups. For the case evaluated in this study differences in DQE of up to +/-15% compared to the mean were found. The differences could be traced back mainly to differences in the modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise power spectrum (NPS) determination. Of special importance is the inclusion of a possible low-frequency drop in MTF and the proper handling of signal offsets for the determination of the NPS. When accounting for these factors the deviation between the evaluations reduced to approximately +/-5%. It is expected that the recently published standard on DQE determination will further reduce variations in the data evaluation and thus in the results of DQE measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15377085     DOI: 10.1118/1.1766421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  13 in total

1.  Relationship between radiation dose reduction and image quality change in photostimulable phosphor luminescence X-ray imaging systems.

Authors:  T Sakurai; R Kawamata; Y Kozai; Y Kaku; K Nakamura; M Saito; H Wakao; I Kashima
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  A method for the determination of the two-dimensional MTF of digital radiography systems using only the noise response.

Authors:  Andrew Kuhls-Gilcrist; Daniel R Bednarek; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2010-03-23

Review 3.  Application of QC_DR software for acceptance testing and routine quality control of direct digital radiography systems: initial experiences using the Italian Association of Physicist in Medicine quality control protocol.

Authors:  Andrea Nitrosi; Marco Bertolini; Giovanni Borasi; Andrea Botti; Adriana Barani; Stefano Rivetti; Luisa Pierotti
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.

Authors:  Andrew Kuhls-Gilcrist; Amit Jain; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Measuring the presampled MTF from a reduced number of flat-field images using the Noise Response (NR) method.

Authors:  Andrew Kuhls-Gilcrist; Amit Jain; Daniel R Bednarek; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2011-03-01

6.  Digital magnification mammography with matched incident exposure: physical imaging properties and detectability of simulated microcalcifications.

Authors:  Nobukazu Tanaka; Kentaro Naka; Hiroko Fukushima; Junji Morishita; Fukai Toyofuku; Masafumi Ohki; Yoshiharu Higashida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-03-18

7.  Application of a variable filter for presampled modulation transfer function analysis with the edge method.

Authors:  Ryo Higashide; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Hiroshi Kunitomo; Kazuya Ohashi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-06-19

8.  Optimization of Image Quality and Dose in Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Agnes M F Fausto; M C Lopes; M C de Sousa; Tânia A C Furquim; Anderson W Mol; Fermin G Velasco
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Investigation of noise sources for digital radiography systems.

Authors:  Lutfi Ergun; Turan Olgar
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-10-01

10.  Basic imaging properties of an indirect flat-panel detector system employing irradiation side sampling (ISS) technology for chest radiography: comparison with a computed radiographic system.

Authors:  Nobukazu Tanaka; Yuki Yano; Hidetake Yabuuchi; Tsutomu Akasaka; Masayuki Sasaki; Masafumi Ohki; Junji Morishita
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-11-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.