Literature DB >> 27692834

Localized chromophobe carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery have excellent oncologic outcomes.

Pierre Bigot1, Jean-Christophe Bernhard2, Vincent Flamand3, Inderbir Gill4, Grégory Verhoest5, Jean Baptiste Beauval6, François Xavier Nouhaud7, Evren Suer8, Guillaume Ploussard9, Jean François Hetet10, Jérôme Rigaud11, Eduard Baco12, Stéphane Larré13, Philippe Sebe14, Nicolas Koutlidis15, Aurélien Descazeaud16, Masatoshi Eto17, Arnaud Doerfler18, Morgan Roupret19, Nam Son Vuong20, Boris Reix21, Toru Matsugasumi4, Adnan El Bakri22, Laurence Albiges23, Michel Soulié24, Jean-Jacques Patard25, Arnaud Méjean26, Karim Bensalah27.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the oncologic outcomes of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for localized chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (cRCC).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter international study involving the French Network for Research on Kidney Cancer (UroCCR) and 5 international teams. Data from 808 patients treated with NSS between 2004 and 2014 for non-clear cell RCCs were analyzed.
RESULTS: We included 234 patients with cRCC. There were 123 (52.6%) females. Median age was 61 (23-88) years. Median tumor size was 3 (1-11)cm. A positive surgical margin was identified in 14 specimens (6%). Pathologic stages were T1, T2, and T3a in 202 (86.3%), 9 (3.8%), and 23 (9.8%) cases, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 46.6 ± 36 months, 2 (0.8%) patients experienced a local recurrence. No patient had metastatic progression, and no patient died from cancer. Three-years estimated cancer-free survival and cancer-specific survival were 99.1% and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Oncological results of NSS for localized cRCC are excellent. In this series, only 2 patients had a local recurrence, and no patient had metastatic progression or died from cancer.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromophobe renal carcinoma; Nephron-sparing surgery; Oncologic outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27692834      PMCID: PMC9084474          DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  19 in total

1.  Prognostic impact of histologic subtyping of adult renal epithelial neoplasms: an experience of 405 cases.

Authors:  Mahul B Amin; Mitual B Amin; Pheroze Tamboli; Javid Javidan; Hans Stricker; Mariza de-Peralta Venturina; Anita Deshpande; Mani Menon
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass.

Authors:  Steven C Campbell; Andrew C Novick; Arie Belldegrun; Michael L Blute; George K Chow; Ithaar H Derweesh; Martha M Faraday; Jihad H Kaouk; Raymond J Leveillee; Surena F Matin; Paul Russo; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults.

Authors:  Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Marina Scarpelli; Rodolfo Montironi; Ziya Kirkali
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Comparison of presentation and outcome for patients 18 to 40 and 60 to 70 years old with solid renal masses.

Authors:  Michael D Gillett; John C Cheville; R Jeffrey Karnes; Christine M Lohse; Eugene D Kwon; Bradley C Leibovich; Horst Zincke; Michael L Blute
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update.

Authors:  Borje Ljungberg; Karim Bensalah; Steven Canfield; Saeed Dabestani; Fabian Hofmann; Milan Hora; Markus A Kuczyk; Thomas Lam; Lorenzo Marconi; Axel S Merseburger; Peter Mulders; Thomas Powles; Michael Staehler; Alessandro Volpe; Axel Bex
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Six chromophobe cell carcinomas and one mixed renal cell carcinoma with chromophobe cell features: clinical and pathological implications.

Authors:  A Usubütün; M C Uygur; A Ayhan; H Ozen; D Remzi
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1996-08

7.  Does histologic subtype affect oncologic outcomes after nephron-sparing surgery?

Authors:  Maxime Crépel; Hendrik Isbarn; Umberto Capitanio; Daniel Liberman; Claudio Jeldres; Maxine Sun; Shahrokh F Shariat; Hugues Widmer; Philippe Arjane; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Jean-Jacques Patard; Paul Perrotte; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors--is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes?

Authors:  William C Huang; Elena B Elkin; Andrew S Levey; Thomas L Jang; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Nephron-sparing techniques independently decrease the risk of cardiovascular events relative to radical nephrectomy in patients with a T1a-T1b renal mass and normal preoperative renal function.

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Carlo Terrone; Alessandro Antonelli; Andrea Minervini; Alessandro Volpe; Maria Furlan; Rayan Matloob; Federica Regis; Cristian Fiori; Francesco Porpiglia; Ettore Di Trapani; Monica Zacchero; Sergio Serni; Andrea Salonia; Marco Carini; Claudio Simeone; Francesco Montorsi; Roberto Bertini
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Cystic lung disease in Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome.

Authors:  Dereje S Ayo; Gregory L Aughenbaugh; Eunhee S Yi; Jennifer L Hand; Jay H Ryu
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  1 in total

1.  Localized chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: preoperative imaging judgment and laparoscopic simple enucleation for treatment.

Authors:  Wenbiao Ren; Bichen Xue; Jiandong Qu; Longfei Liu; Chao Li; Xiongbing Zu
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.