Literature DB >> 15879770

Comparison of presentation and outcome for patients 18 to 40 and 60 to 70 years old with solid renal masses.

Michael D Gillett1, John C Cheville, R Jeffrey Karnes, Christine M Lohse, Eugene D Kwon, Bradley C Leibovich, Horst Zincke, Michael L Blute.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared histological subtype, pathological features and outcome of patients with solid renal masses who were 18 to 40 years old vs patients who were 60 to 70 years old.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the Mayo Clinic Nephrectomy Registry from 1970 to 2000, and identified 124 patients 18 to 40 years old and 1,067 patients 60 to 70 years old available for analysis.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of benign solid renal masses between patients 18 to 40 years old and those 60 to 70 years old (13.7% vs 10.2%). Among patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), younger patients were more likely to have chromophobe RCC (13.1% vs 3.6%) and less likely to have clear cell RCC (70.1% vs 81.5%) than older patients. Among patients with clear cell RCC, younger patients were more likely to have stage pT2b or lower tumors (82.7% vs 69.9%) and a higher incidence of cystic clear cell RCC (10.7% vs 2.2%) than older patients. Younger patients had an improved cancer specific survival compared with older patients but this difference was not statistically significant (risk ratio 0.71, p =0.127).
CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients 18 to 40 years old were more likely to have chromophobe and less likely to have clear cell RCC compared with patients 60 to 70 years old. We did not identify a higher incidence of papillary RCC in younger patients. Patients with clear cell RCC 18 to 40 years old had a higher incidence of low stage and cystic tumors compared with patients 60 to 70 years old, features which have been shown to have a favorable prognosis. These factors likely contributed to improved cancer specific survival for younger patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15879770     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158157.57981.80

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  24 in total

Review 1.  Systemic therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in older adults.

Authors:  Sumanta K Pal; Ari Vanderwalde; Arti Hurria; Robert A Figlin
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Renal cell carcinoma: Are we attacking a different tumor over the past 10 years?

Authors:  Ahmed Fouad Kotb; Doaa Attia; Mohamed Mohie Hashad; Tamer Mohammed Abou Youssif; Nora Abdelkawy; Asmaa Ismail; Ahmed Elabbady; Mohamed Adel Atta
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2016-04

3.  A serotype 5/3 adenovirus expressing MDA-7/IL-24 infects renal carcinoma cells and promotes toxicity of agents that increase ROS and ceramide levels.

Authors:  Margaret A Park; Hossein A Hamed; Clint Mitchell; Nichola Cruickshanks; Rupesh Dash; Jeremy Allegood; Igor P Dmitriev; Gary Tye; Besim Ogretmen; Sarah Spiegel; Adly Yacoub; Steven Grant; David T Curiel; Paul B Fisher; Paul Dent
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  Efficacy of targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the elderly patient population.

Authors:  Husain K Khambati; Toni K Choueiri; Christian K Kollmannsberger; Scott North; George A Bjarnason; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Lori Wood; Jennifer J Knox; Min-Han Tan; Mary J MacKenzie; Frede Donskov; Brian I Rini; Daniel Y C Heng
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.872

5.  Clinicopathologic features of renal cell carcinoma in young adults: a comparison study with renal cell carcinoma in older patients.

Authors:  Jae Hee Suh; Tina Oak; Jae Y Ro; Luan D Truong; Alberto G Ayala; Steven S Shen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-01-30

6.  The relationship between histopathology and age factor in patients who were operated for renal masses.

Authors:  Taha Numan Yıkılmaz; Okan Baş; Ali İhsan Arık; Fatih Hızlı; Halil Başar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

7.  Renal cell carcinoma in young and old patients--is there a difference?

Authors:  R Houston Thompson; Maria A Ordonez; Alexia Iasonos; Fernando P Secin; Bertrand Guillonneau; Paul Russo; Karim Touijer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Age, tumor size and relative survival of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology and end results analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin J Scoll; Yu-Ning Wong; Brian L Egleston; David A Kunkle; Ismail R Saad; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  [Value of the postoperative Störkel score. Predict disease-free survival of patients with surgically resected renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  M May; S Brookman-Amissah; S Pflanz; N Knoll; J Roigas; S Gunia; B Hoschke; F Kendel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  The effect of age on cancer-specific mortality in patients with small renal masses: A population-based analysis.

Authors:  Marco Bandini; Michele Marchioni; Raisa S Pompe; Zhe Tian; Tristan Martel; Felix K Chun; Luca Cindolo; Anil Kapoor; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.