Literature DB >> 27689183

Easy Pulsatile Phantom for Teaching and Validation of Flow Measurements in Ultrasound.

M B Rominger1, E-M Müller-Stuler2, M Pinto2, A S Becker2, K Martini2, T Frauenfelder2, V Klingmüller2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To build a simple model to teach and validate non-pulsatile and pulsatile flow quantification in ultrasound.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The setting consists of the following connected components: (1) medical syringe pump producing an adjustable constant flow (ml/min), (2) modulator modifying constant flow to a reproducible pulsatile flow, (3) water tank containing a diagonal running silicone tube (0.5 mm inner diameter), and (4) a fixated ultrasound probe (L9 Linear Array 9 MHz, GE Logiq E9) measuring the flow inside the tube. Commercially available microbubbles suspended with physiological saline solution were used for ultrasonic visibility. Spectral Doppler of different flow profiles is performed.
RESULTS: The syringe pump produces an adjustable, constant flow and serves as the reference standard. The filling volume of the tube system is 1.2 ml. Microbubbles are very well detected by ultrasound and can be used as an easy and clean blood mimicking substance. The modulator generates different physiological and pathological flow profiles. Velocities are similar to those found within human blood vessels. Thus, it is possible to train and validate flow measurements in ultrasound.
CONCLUSION: The model produces non-pulsatile and various pulsatile flow profiles and allows validation of flow measurements. The compact size permits easy and economic setup for flow measurements in research, skills lab and continuing education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood vessels; education; ultrasound; ultrasound color doppler; ultrasound spectral doppler

Year:  2016        PMID: 27689183      PMCID: PMC5026039          DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-106396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open        ISSN: 2199-7152


  13 in total

1.  Nonlinearity parameter for tissue-mimicking materials.

Authors:  F Dong; E L Madsen; M C MacDonald; J A Zagzebski
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Influence of bubble size distribution on the echogenicity of ultrasound contrast agents: a study of SonoVue.

Authors:  J M Gorce; M Arditi; M Schneider
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Assessment of the acoustic properties of common tissue-mimicking test phantoms.

Authors:  J E Browne; K V Ramnarine; A J Watson; P R Hoskins
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Towards an ideal blood analogue for Doppler ultrasound phantoms.

Authors:  C P Oates
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Simulation and validation of arterial ultrasound imaging and blood flow.

Authors:  Peter R Hoskins
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  The use of microbubbles in Doppler ultrasound studies.

Authors:  Piero Tortoli; Francesco Guidi; Riccardo Mori; Hendrik J Vos
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Development of a vessel-mimicking material for use in anatomically realistic Doppler flow phantoms.

Authors:  Deirdre M King; Carmel M Moran; John D McNamara; Andrew J Fagan; Jacinta E Browne
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Validation of a new blood-mimicking fluid for use in Doppler flow test objects.

Authors:  K V Ramnarine; D K Nassiri; P R Hoskins; J Lubbers
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver--update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS.

Authors:  M Claudon; C F Dietrich; B I Choi; D O Cosgrove; M Kudo; C P Nolsøe; F Piscaglia; S R Wilson; R G Barr; M C Chammas; N G Chaubal; M-H Chen; D A Clevert; J M Correas; H Ding; F Forsberg; J B Fowlkes; R N Gibson; B B Goldberg; N Lassau; E L S Leen; R F Mattrey; F Moriyasu; L Solbiati; H-P Weskott; H-X Xu
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 6.548

Review 10.  A review of Doppler ultrasound quality assurance protocols and test devices.

Authors:  Jacinta E Browne
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.