Literature DB >> 25212384

A review of Doppler ultrasound quality assurance protocols and test devices.

Jacinta E Browne1.   

Abstract

In this paper, an overview of Doppler ultrasound quality assurance (QA) testing will be presented in three sections. The first section will review the different Doppler ultrasound parameters recommended by professional bodies for use in QA protocols. The second section will include an evaluation and critique of the main test devices used to assess Doppler performance, while the final section of this paper will discuss which of the wide range of test devices have been found to be most suitable for inclusion in Doppler QA programmes. Pulsed Wave Spectral Doppler, Colour Doppler Imaging QA test protocols have been recommended over the years by various professional bodies, including the UK's Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM), the American Institute for Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). However, despite the existence of such recommended test protocols, very few commercial or research test devices exist which can measure the full range of both PW Doppler ultrasound and colour Doppler imaging performance parameters, particularly quality control measurements such as: (i) Doppler sensitivity (ii) colour Doppler spatial resolution (iii) colour Doppler temporal resolution (iv) colour Doppler velocity resolution (v) clutter filter performance and (vi) tissue movement artefact suppression. In this review, the merits of the various commercial and research test devices will be considered and a summary of results obtained from published studies which have made use of some of these Doppler test devices, such as the flow, string, rotating and belt phantom, will be presented.
Copyright © 2014 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doppler test devices; Doppler ultrasound quality assurance; Flow phantoms; String phantoms and Doppler ultrasound performance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25212384     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  9 in total

1.  Easy Pulsatile Phantom for Teaching and Validation of Flow Measurements in Ultrasound.

Authors:  M B Rominger; E-M Müller-Stuler; M Pinto; A S Becker; K Martini; T Frauenfelder; V Klingmüller
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2016-07-13

2.  Accurate and continuous ultrasonography evaluation of small diameter vascular prostheses in vivo.

Authors:  Jing Shi; Jialing Zhang; Meng Yin; Qian Wang; Jun Du
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Imaging of blood flow and oxygen state with a multi-segment optoacoustic ultrasound array.

Authors:  Elena Merčep; Xosé Luís Deán-Ben; Daniel Razansky
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2018-04-27

4.  Compatibility and Validation of a Recent Developed Artificial Blood through the Vascular Phantom Using Doppler Ultrasound Color- and Motion-mode Techniques.

Authors:  Marwan Alshipli; Mohannad Adel Sayah; Ammar A Oglat
Journal:  J Med Ultrasound       Date:  2020-04-23

Review 5.  A Brief Review for Common Doppler Ultrasound Flow Phantoms.

Authors:  Sabri M Shalbi; Ammar A Oglat; Balid Albarbar; Fuzi Elkut; M A Qaeed; Ali Abu Arra
Journal:  J Med Ultrasound       Date:  2020-06-02

6.  Projection-based stereolithography for direct 3D printing of heterogeneous ultrasound phantoms.

Authors:  Samantha J Paulsen; Trevor M Mitcham; Charlene S Pan; James Long; Bagrat Grigoryan; Daniel W Sazer; Collin J Harlan; Kevin D Janson; Mark D Pagel; Jordan S Miller; Richard R Bouchard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in Detecting Blood Flow Signals of Breast Lesions: A Preliminary Study Comparing SMI to Color Doppler Flow Imaging.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Gang Li; Jing Li; Wei-Dong Ren
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Automated quality control of ultrasound based on in-air reverberation patterns.

Authors:  Pepijn van Horssen; Arnold Schilham; Dennis Dickerscheid; Niels van der Werf; Han Keijzers; Ronald van Almere; Joost Kuijer; Rob Peters; Mark Hofman
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2017-09-29

Review 9.  Chemical Items Used for Preparing Tissue-Mimicking Material of Wall-Less Flow Phantom for Doppler Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Ammar A Oglat; M Z Matjafri; Nursakinah Suardi; Mohammad A Oqlat; Mostafa A Abdelrahman; Ahmad A Oqlat; Omar F Farhat; Batool N Alkhateb; Raed Abdalrheem; Muntaser S Ahmad; Mohammed Y M Abujazar
Journal:  J Med Ultrasound       Date:  2018-05-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.