Clare Meernik1, Kristen Jarman2, Sarah Towner Wright3, Elizabeth G Klein4, Adam O Goldstein5, Leah Ranney6. 1. Research Specialist, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Family Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC. 2. Project Manager, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC. 3. Clinical Librarian, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Health Sciences Library, Chapel Hill, NC. 4. Associate Professor, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, Columbus, OH. 5. Physician, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Family Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC. 6. Director, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Family Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this paper we synthesize the evidence from eye tracking research in tobacco control to inform tobacco regulatory strategies and tobacco communication campaigns. METHODS: We systematically searched 11 databases for studies that reported eye tracking outcomes in regards to tobacco regulation and communication. Two coders independently reviewed studies for inclusion and abstracted study characteristics and findings. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met full criteria for inclusion. Eye tracking studies on health warnings consistently showed these warnings often were ignored, though eye tracking demonstrated that novel warnings, graphic warnings, and plain packaging can increase attention toward warnings. Eye tracking also revealed that greater visual attention to warnings on advertisements and packages consistently was associated with cognitive processing as measured by warning recall. CONCLUSIONS: Eye tracking is a valid indicator of attention, cognitive processing, and memory. The use of this technology in tobacco control research complements existing methods in tobacco regulatory and communication science; it also can be used to examine the effects of health warnings and other tobacco product communications on consumer behavior in experimental settings prior to the implementation of novel health communication policies. However, the utility of eye tracking will be enhanced by the standardization of methodology and reporting metrics.
OBJECTIVE: In this paper we synthesize the evidence from eye tracking research in tobacco control to inform tobacco regulatory strategies and tobacco communication campaigns. METHODS: We systematically searched 11 databases for studies that reported eye tracking outcomes in regards to tobacco regulation and communication. Two coders independently reviewed studies for inclusion and abstracted study characteristics and findings. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met full criteria for inclusion. Eye tracking studies on health warnings consistently showed these warnings often were ignored, though eye tracking demonstrated that novel warnings, graphic warnings, and plain packaging can increase attention toward warnings. Eye tracking also revealed that greater visual attention to warnings on advertisements and packages consistently was associated with cognitive processing as measured by warning recall. CONCLUSIONS: Eye tracking is a valid indicator of attention, cognitive processing, and memory. The use of this technology in tobacco control research complements existing methods in tobacco regulatory and communication science; it also can be used to examine the effects of health warnings and other tobacco product communications on consumer behavior in experimental settings prior to the implementation of novel health communication policies. However, the utility of eye tracking will be enhanced by the standardization of methodology and reporting metrics.
Entities:
Keywords:
advertising; eye tracking; health communication; health warnings; plain packaging; smoking; tobacco
Authors: Jie Wu Weiss; Steven Cen; Darleen V Schuster; Jennifer B Unger; C Anderson Johnson; Michele Mouttapa; William S Schreiner; Tess Boley Cruz Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Ann McNeill; Pete Driezen Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Philip Smith; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Richard O'Connor; Anthony Brown; Chris Banthin; Sara Guardino-Colket; K Michael Cummings Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Seema Mutti; David Hammond; Ron Borland; Michael K Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Addiction Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Andrew A Strasser; Kathy Z Tang; Daniel Romer; Christopher Jepson; Joseph N Cappella Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Chris Skurka; Deena Kemp; Julie Davydova; James F Thrasher; Sahara Byrne; Amelia Greiner Safi; Rosemary J Avery; Michael C Dorf; Alan D Mathios; Leah Scolere; Jeff Niederdeppe Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Agnes Hardardottir; Mohammed Al-Hamdani; Raymond Klein; Austin Hurst; Sherry H Stewart Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: James F Thrasher; Noel T Brewer; Jeff Niederdeppe; Ellen Peters; Andrew A Strasser; Rachel Grana; Annette R Kaufman Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Kirsten Lochbuehler; Melissa Mercincavage; Kathy Z Tang; C Dana Tomlin; Joseph N Cappella; Andrew A Strasser Journal: Tob Control Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Anna Gaysynsky; Camella J Rising; Neha Trivedi; Kelly D Blake; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; April Oh; Robin C Vanderpool Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2021-07-27 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Kristen L Jarman; Sarah D Kowitt; Tara L Queen; Leah M Ranney; KyungSu Kim; Ellen E Jones; Emily Donovan; Adam O Goldstein Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2018-11
Authors: Melissa Mercincavage; Jordan Burdge; Kirsten Lochbuehler; Valentina Souprountchouk; Alexandra A McCullough; Andrew A Strasser Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2018-11
Authors: Elizabeth G Klein; Amanda J Quisenberry; Abigail B Shoben; Tiffany Thomson; SuSandi Htut; Randi E Foraker; Albert M Lai; Michael D Slater Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2018-11