Literature DB >> 28512171

Effect of message congruency on attention and recall in pictorial health warning labels.

Kirsten Lochbuehler1,2, Melissa Mercincavage1,2, Kathy Z Tang2, C Dana Tomlin3, Joseph N Cappella1,4, Andrew A Strasser1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The nine pictorial health warning labels (PWLs) proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration vary in format and feature of visual and textual information. Congruency is the degree to which visual and textual features reflect a common theme. This characteristic can affect attention and recall of label content. This study investigates the effect of congruency in PWLs on smoker's attention and recall of label content.
METHODS: 120 daily smokers were randomly assigned to view either congruent or incongruent PWLs, while having their eye movements recorded. Participants were asked to recall label content immediately after exposure and 5 days later.
RESULTS: Overall, the image was viewed more and recalled better than the text. Smokers in the incongruent condition spent more time focusing on the text than smokers in the congruent condition (p=0.03), but dwell time of the image did not differ. Despite lower dwell time on the text, smokers in the congruent condition were more likely to correctly recall it on day 1 (p=0.02) and the risk message of the PWLs on both day 1 (p=0.01) and day 5 (p=0.006) than smokers in the incongruent condition.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies an important design feature of PWLs and demonstrates objective differences in how smokers process PWLs. Our results suggest that message congruency between visual and textual information is beneficial to recall of label content. Moreover, images captured and held smokers' attention better than the text. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; congruency; eye-tracking; health warning labels; recall

Year:  2017        PMID: 28512171      PMCID: PMC5690894          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  27 in total

1.  Integrating text and pictorial information: eye movements when looking at print advertisements.

Authors:  K Rayner; C M Rotello; A J Stewart; J Keir; S A Duffy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2001-09

2.  The cue-availability paradigm: the effects of cigarette availability on cue reactivity in smokers.

Authors:  B L Carter; S T Tiffany
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Showing leads to doing: graphic cigarette warning labels are an effective public health policy.

Authors:  David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; Paul W McDonald; K Stephen Brown; Roy Cameron
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Text and graphic warnings on cigarette packages: findings from the international tobacco control four country study.

Authors:  David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Ann McNeill; Pete Driezen
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Using eye-tracking to examine how embedding risk corrective statements improves cigarette risk beliefs: Implications for tobacco regulatory policy.

Authors:  Kirsten Lochbuehler; Kathy Z Tang; Valentina Souprountchouk; Dana Campetti; Joseph N Cappella; Lynn T Kozlowski; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Recall and eye tracking study of adolescents viewing tobacco advertisements.

Authors:  P M Fischer; J W Richards; E J Berman; D M Krugman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The Contemplation Ladder: validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation.

Authors:  L Biener; D B Abrams
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 8.  The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Diane B Francis; Christy Bridges; Jennah M Sontag; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Does Size Impact Attention and Recall of Graphic Health Warnings?

Authors:  Elizabeth G Klein; Abigail B Shoben; Sarah Krygowski; Amy Ferketich; Micah Berman; Ellen Peters; Unnava Rao; Mary Ellen Wewers
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2015-07-01

Review 10.  Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Marissa G Hall; Diane B Francis; Kurt M Ribisl; Jessica K Pepper; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  17 in total

1.  Temporal Effects of Message Congruency on Attention to and Recall of Pictorial Health Warning Labels on Cigarette Packages.

Authors:  Kirsten Lochbuehler; E Paul Wileyto; Melissa Mercincavage; Valentina Souprountchouk; Jordan Z Burdge; Kathy Z Tang; Joseph N Cappella; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings Increase Some Risk Appraisals But Not Risk Beliefs: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Jacob A Rohde; Joshua O Barker; Marissa G Hall; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Hum Commun Res       Date:  2020-02-03

3.  Recalling, Sharing and Participating in a Social Media Intervention Promoting HIV Testing: A Longitudinal Analysis of HIV Testing Among MSM in China.

Authors:  Bolin Cao; Pooja T Saha; Sequoia I Leuba; Haidong Lu; Weiming Tang; Dan Wu; Jason Ong; Chuncheng Liu; Rong Fu; Chongyi Wei; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2019-05

4.  Designing Effective Testimonial Pictorial Warning Labels for Tobacco Products.

Authors:  Emily Brennan; Erin Maloney; Yotam Ophir; Joseph N Cappella
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2018-07-09

Review 5.  Advancing Tobacco Product Warning Labels Research Methods and Theory: A Summary of a Grantee Meeting Held by the US National Cancer Institute.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Noel T Brewer; Jeff Niederdeppe; Ellen Peters; Andrew A Strasser; Rachel Grana; Annette R Kaufman
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Developing Pictorial Cigarillo Warnings: Insights From Focus Groups.

Authors:  Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Jessica L King; Allison J Lazard; Seth M Noar; Beth A Reboussin; Desmond Jenson; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Visual Attention Patterns Differ by Pictorial Health Warning Label Features.

Authors:  Melissa Mercincavage; Jordan Burdge; Kirsten Lochbuehler; Valentina Souprountchouk; Alexandra A McCullough; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2018-11

8.  Reactions to tobacco warning labels: predictors and outcomes of adaptive and maladaptive responses.

Authors:  Daniel Owusu; Jiyeon So; Lucy Popova
Journal:  Addict Res Theory       Date:  2019-02-22

9.  Responses to pictorial versus text-only cigarillo warnings among a nationally representative sample of US young adults.

Authors:  Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Allison J Lazard; Jessica L King; Seth M Noar; Beth A Reboussin; Desmond Jenson; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  People in E-Cigarette Ads Attract More Attention: An Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Elise M Stevens; Amanda L Johnson; Glenn Leshner; FuWei Sun; Seunghyun Kim; Eleanor L S Leavens; Alayna P Tackett; Emily T Hébert; Theodore L Wagener
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2020-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.