Literature DB >> 22704744

Graphic warning labels in cigarette advertisements: recall and viewing patterns.

Andrew A Strasser1, Kathy Z Tang, Daniel Romer, Christopher Jepson, Joseph N Cappella.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Family Smoking Prevention and Control Act gave the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) legal authority to mandate graphic warning labels on cigarette advertising and packaging. The FDA requires that these graphic warning labels be embedded into cigarette advertising and packaging by September 2012.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine differences in recall and viewing patterns of text-only versus graphic cigarette warning labels and the association between viewing patterns and recall.
METHODS: Participants (current daily smokers; N=200) were randomized to view a cigarette advertisement with either text-only or graphic warning labels. Viewing patterns were measured using eye-tracking, and recall was later assessed. Sessions were conducted between November 2008 and November 2009. Data analysis was conducted between March 2011 and July 2011.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in percentage correct recall of the warning label between those in the text-only versus graphic warning label condition, 50% vs 83% (χ(2)=23.74, p=0.0001). Time to first viewing of the graphic warning label text and dwell time duration (i.e., time spent looking) on the graphic image were significantly associated with correct recall. Warning labels that drew attention more quickly and resulted in longer dwell times were associated with better recall.
CONCLUSIONS: Graphic warning labels improve smokers' recall of warning and health risks; these labels do so by drawing and holding attention.
Copyright © 2012 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22704744      PMCID: PMC3377985          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  18 in total

1.  The Florida "truth" anti-tobacco media evaluation: design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations.

Authors:  D F Sly; G R Heald; S Ray
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Impact of the graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behaviour.

Authors:  D Hammond; G T Fong; P W McDonald; R Cameron; K S Brown
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

Authors:  D Hammond; G T Fong; A McNeill; R Borland; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Evaluating smokers' reactions to advertising for new lower nicotine quest cigarettes.

Authors:  William G Shadel; Caryn Lerman; Joseph Cappella; Andrew A Strasser; Angela Pinto; Robert Hornik
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2006-03

Review 5.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 6.  Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review.

Authors:  David Hammond
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Initial impact of the new Australian tobacco health warnings on knowledge and beliefs.

Authors:  R Borland; D Hill
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Recall and eye tracking study of adolescents viewing tobacco advertisements.

Authors:  P M Fischer; J W Richards; E J Berman; D M Krugman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Reliability of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire and the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence.

Authors:  C S Pomerleau; S M Carton; M L Lutzke; K A Flessland; O F Pomerleau
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.913

10.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire.

Authors:  T F Heatherton; L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; K O Fagerström
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1991-09
View more
  54 in total

1.  Evaluating Point of Sale Tobacco Marketing Using Behavioral Laboratory Methods.

Authors:  Jason D Robinson; David J Drobes; Thomas H Brandon; David W Wetter; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-10

Review 2.  Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Warning Labels: Lessons Learned From the Tobacco Industry.

Authors:  Lucy Popova
Journal:  J Calif Dent Assoc       Date:  2016-12

3.  A fMRI study on the impact of advertising for flavored e-cigarettes on susceptible young adults.

Authors:  Kathleen A Garrison; Stephanie S O'Malley; Ralitza Gueorguieva; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Using eye-tracking to examine how embedding risk corrective statements improves cigarette risk beliefs: Implications for tobacco regulatory policy.

Authors:  Kirsten Lochbuehler; Kathy Z Tang; Valentina Souprountchouk; Dana Campetti; Joseph N Cappella; Lynn T Kozlowski; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Optimizing Warnings on E-Cigarette Advertisements.

Authors:  Jessica L King; Allison Lazard; Beth A Reboussin; Leah Ranney; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Kimberly G Wagoner; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Temporal Effects of Message Congruency on Attention to and Recall of Pictorial Health Warning Labels on Cigarette Packages.

Authors:  Kirsten Lochbuehler; E Paul Wileyto; Melissa Mercincavage; Valentina Souprountchouk; Jordan Z Burdge; Kathy Z Tang; Joseph N Cappella; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Framing Indoor Tanning Warning Messages to Reduce Skin Cancer Risks Among Young Women: Implications for Research and Policy.

Authors:  Darren Mays; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Effect of message congruency on attention and recall in pictorial health warning labels.

Authors:  Kirsten Lochbuehler; Melissa Mercincavage; Kathy Z Tang; C Dana Tomlin; Joseph N Cappella; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Eye Tracking Outcomes in Tobacco Control Regulation and Communication: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Clare Meernik; Kristen Jarman; Sarah Towner Wright; Elizabeth G Klein; Adam O Goldstein; Leah Ranney
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-10

10.  Reducing smoking among distracted individuals: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Matthew Wallaert; Andrew Ward; Traci Mann
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.