Anna Gaysynsky1,2, Camella J Rising3, Neha Trivedi3, Kelly D Blake3, Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou3, April Oh4, Robin C Vanderpool3. 1. Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 9609 Medical Center Drive, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. anna.gaysynsky@nih.gov. 2. ICF Next, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. anna.gaysynsky@nih.gov. 3. Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 9609 Medical Center Drive, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. 4. Implementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze communication-focused grants funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) between fiscal years 2013 and 2019 to provide insight into the characteristics of funded projects and identify promising areas for future research. METHODS: iSearch, a portfolio analysis tool, was queried to identify communication-related grants funded by NCI. Abstracts and specific aims were coded for key study characteristics. 344 unique competing grants with a substantial communication component were included in the final analysis. SAS version 9.4 was used to calculate code frequencies. RESULTS: Most communication grants focused on cancer prevention (n = 197), with fewer targeting diagnosis, treatment, survivorship, or end-of-life. Tobacco product use was the most frequently addressed topic (n = 128). Most grants targeted or measured outcomes at the individual (n = 332) or interpersonal level (n = 127). Cancer patients/survivors (n = 101) and healthcare providers (n = 63) were often the population of focus, while caregivers or those at increased risk for cancer received less attention. Studies were often based in healthcare settings (n = 125); few studies were based in schools or worksites. Many grants employed randomized controlled trials (n = 168), but more novel methods, like optimization trials, were uncommon. CONCLUSION: NCI's support of health communication research covers a diverse array of topics, populations, and methods. However, the current analysis also points to several promising opportunities for future research, including efforts focused on communication at later stages of the cancer control continuum and at multiple levels of influence, as well as studies that take advantage of a greater diversity of settings and leverage novel methodological approaches.
PURPOSE: To analyze communication-focused grants funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) between fiscal years 2013 and 2019 to provide insight into the characteristics of funded projects and identify promising areas for future research. METHODS: iSearch, a portfolio analysis tool, was queried to identify communication-related grants funded by NCI. Abstracts and specific aims were coded for key study characteristics. 344 unique competing grants with a substantial communication component were included in the final analysis. SAS version 9.4 was used to calculate code frequencies. RESULTS: Most communication grants focused on cancer prevention (n = 197), with fewer targeting diagnosis, treatment, survivorship, or end-of-life. Tobacco product use was the most frequently addressed topic (n = 128). Most grants targeted or measured outcomes at the individual (n = 332) or interpersonal level (n = 127). Cancerpatients/survivors (n = 101) and healthcare providers (n = 63) were often the population of focus, while caregivers or those at increased risk for cancer received less attention. Studies were often based in healthcare settings (n = 125); few studies were based in schools or worksites. Many grants employed randomized controlled trials (n = 168), but more novel methods, like optimization trials, were uncommon. CONCLUSION: NCI's support of health communication research covers a diverse array of topics, populations, and methods. However, the current analysis also points to several promising opportunities for future research, including efforts focused on communication at later stages of the cancer control continuum and at multiple levels of influence, as well as studies that take advantage of a greater diversity of settings and leverage novel methodological approaches.
Authors: Emily K Vraga; Anthony Stefanidis; Georgios Lamprianidis; Arie Croitoru; Andrew T Crooks; Paul L Delamater; Dieter Pfoser; Jacek R Radzikowski; Kathryn H Jacobsen Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2018-01-09
Authors: Diane B Francis; Joan R Cates; Kyla P Garrett Wagner; Tracey Zola; Jenny E Fitter; Tamera Coyne-Beasley Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2017-02-06
Authors: James F Thrasher; Noel T Brewer; Jeff Niederdeppe; Ellen Peters; Andrew A Strasser; Rachel Grana; Annette R Kaufman Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Philip M Massey; Amy Leader; Elad Yom-Tov; Alexandra Budenz; Kara Fisher; Ann C Klassen Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 5.428