| Literature DB >> 27667204 |
Guoyuan Li1,2, Lei Wang1,2, Wei Pan1,2, Fei Yang1, Wenbo Jiang3, Xianbo Wu4, Xiangdong Kong1,2, Kerong Dai1,3, Yongqiang Hao1,2.
Abstract
Metallic implants with a low efEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27667204 PMCID: PMC5036184 DOI: 10.1038/srep34072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Computer aid design of porous Ti6Al4V alloy scaffolds with different pore size used in vitro.
(a) A single unit of diamond-shaped lattice; (b) pore size of 300~400 μm; (c) pore size of 400~500 μm; (d) pore size of 500~700 μm.
Figure 2Scaffold appearance and cell adhesion, growth and morphology on the tested scaffolds.
(a) Scaffolds used in the in vitro experiment with a height and diameter of 2 and 10 mm, respectively. (b) SEM micrographs of porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds and cell morphology on porous scaffolds after being cultured for 7 days. The cells were mainly located between the gaps of the struts, flattened and spread well with numerous filopodia extensions, and the cell number in the group of intended pore size of 300 to 400 μm was higher than that of the other two groups. (c) Cell adhesion on the tested scaffolds. A higher OD value indicates that more cells adhered on the scaffolds. (d) Cell growth on the tested scaffolds. A higher OD value indicates that more cells grew or remained “alive” on the scaffolds (#p < 0.05).
Figure 3Scaffolds used in the in vivo experiment with a height and diameter of 30 and 10 mm (a) gross specimens at different time points (3 months, 6 months and 12 months) (b).
Mean pore size, porosity and mechanical properties of porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds.
| Group | 300–400 μm | 400–500 μm | 500–700 μm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pore Size/μm | designed | 300–400 | 400–500 | 500–700 |
| manufactured | 315 ± 76 | 485 ± 83 | 574 ± 49 | |
| Porosity/% | designed | 80 | 80 | 80 |
| manufactured | 33.8 ± 0.8 | 50.9 ± 0.6 | 61.3 ± 0.4 | |
| Elastic Modulus/GPa | 3.7 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | |
| Compressive Strength/MPa | 115.2 ± 12.8 | 51.5 ± 6.4 | 33.1 ± 5.4 | |
Figure 4Cell osteogenic differentiation in vitro.
ALP activity at day 7 (a) and semi-quantitative analysis of calcium nodule at day 21 (b) on porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds and the control samples. A high OD value indicates that much more calcium nodule formed on the scaffolds (#p < 0.05, *p < 0.01).
Figure 5Plain radiographs (anterior-posterior and lateral) (a) and CT scans of specimens (proximal, middle and distal positions) (b) at different time points (3 months, 6 months and 12 months). New bone formation appeared on the lateral side opposite to the plate, and continuous mature bone was observed around the scaffolds at 1 year.
Figure 6Histologic sections of porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds implanted into goat metatarsus large segmental defects and semi-quantitative of new bone area in the scaffolds. At 3 months, callus in the periphery regions had formed; apparent bone ingrowth was observed at 6 months; at 12 months, the inner space of the scaffolds was nearly completely filled with bone tissue. New bone area increased with time and, compared with the middle position, both ends had relatively more amounts of new bone, with the proximal position being superior to the distal position. Stain: Stevenel’s blue and Van Gieson’s picrofuchsin. Purple indicates bone; black indicates materials; blue indicates fibrovascular tissue.
Figure 7SEM micrographs of bone apposition and bone microstructure on porous scaffolds in different positons at 3 month, 6month and 12 month.
White indicate Ti6Al4V, grey indicate new bone.