Literature DB >> 32124052

Scaffolds and coatings for bone regeneration.

Helena Filipa Pereira1,2,3, Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz4,5,6, Filipe Samuel Silva7, Rui Luís Reis4,5,6, Joaquim Miguel Oliveira4,5,6.   

Abstract

Bone tissue has an astonishing self-healing capacity yet only for non-critical size defects (<6 mm) and clinical intervention is needed for critical-size defects and beyond that along with non-union bone fractures and bone defects larger than critical size represent a major healthcare problem. Autografts are, still, being used as preferred to treat large bone defects. Mostly, due to the presence of living differentiated and progenitor cells, its osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties that allow osteogenesis, vascularization, and provide structural support. Bone tissue engineering strategies have been proposed to overcome the limited supply of grafts. Complete and successful bone regeneration can be influenced by several factors namely: the age of the patient, health, gender and is expected that the ideal scaffold for bone regeneration combines factors such as bioactivity and osteoinductivity. The commercially available products have as their main function the replacement of bone. Moreover, scaffolds still present limitations including poor osteointegration and limited vascularization. The introduction of pores in scaffolds are being used to promote the osteointegration as it allows cell and vessel infiltration. Moreover, combinations with growth factors or coatings have been explored as they can improve the osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties of the scaffold. This review focuses on the bone defects treatments and on the research of scaffolds for bone regeneration. Moreover, it summarizes the latest progress in the development of coatings used in bone tissue engineering. Despite the interesting advances which include the development of hybrid scaffolds, there are still important challenges that need to be addressed in order to fasten translation of scaffolds into the clinical scenario. Finally, we must reflect on the main challenges for bone tissue regeneration. There is a need to achieve a proper mechanical properties to bear the load of movements; have a scaffolds with a structure that fit the bone anatomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32124052     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-020-06364-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  142 in total

1.  The free vascularized bone graft. A clinical extension of microvascular techniques.

Authors:  G I Taylor; G D Miller; F J Ham
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Normal bone anatomy and physiology.

Authors:  Bart Clarke
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Osteoinduction of porous Ti implants with a channel structure fabricated by selective laser melting.

Authors:  A Fukuda; M Takemoto; T Saito; S Fujibayashi; M Neo; Deepak K Pattanayak; T Matsushita; K Sasaki; N Nishida; T Kokubo; T Nakamura
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Performance of laser sintered Ti-6Al-4V implants with bone-inspired porosity and micro/nanoscale surface roughness in the rabbit femur.

Authors:  David J Cohen; Alice Cheng; Kaan Sahingur; Ryan M Clohessy; Louis B Hopkins; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.715

5.  Antibacterial effect and cytotoxicity of Ag-doped functionally graded hydroxyapatite coatings.

Authors:  Xiao Bai; Stefan Sandukas; Mark Appleford; Joo L Ong; Afsaneh Rabiei
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.368

6.  Induced membranes secrete growth factors including vascular and osteoinductive factors and could stimulate bone regeneration.

Authors:  Ph Pelissier; A C Masquelet; R Bareille; S Mathoulin Pelissier; J Amedee
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Bioactive borate glass promotes the repair of radius segmental bone defects by enhancing the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs.

Authors:  Jieyuan Zhang; Junjie Guan; Changqing Zhang; Hui Wang; Wenhai Huang; Shangchun Guo; Xin Niu; Zongping Xie; Yang Wang
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.715

Review 8.  Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK.

Authors:  Rui Ma; Tingting Tang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Bone regeneration of hydroxyapatite/alumina bilayered scaffold with 3 mm passage-like medullary canal in canine tibia model.

Authors:  Jong Min Kim; Jun Sik Son; Seong Soo Kang; Gonhyung Kim; Seok Hwa Choi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions.

Authors:  Ahmad Oryan; Soodeh Alidadi; Ali Moshiri; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Management of bone diseases: looking at scaffold-based strategies for drug delivery.

Authors:  Myriam Bordone; Ana Bettencourt
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 5.671

2.  Liquid flow in scaffold derived from natural source: experimental observations and biological outcome.

Authors:  Elisabetta Salerno; Giulia Orlandi; Claudio Ongaro; Alessandro d'Adamo; Andrea Ruffini; Gianluca Carnevale; Barbara Zardin; Jessika Bertacchini; Diego Angeli
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 3.  Modifying MSC Phenotype to Facilitate Bone Healing: Biological Approaches.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Tzuhua Lin
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-24

Review 4.  The Role of Adipose Stem Cells in Bone Regeneration and Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Wolfgang Mende; Rebekka Götzl; Yusuke Kubo; Thomas Pufe; Tim Ruhl; Justus P Beier
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 5.  Strategies for Bone Regeneration: From Graft to Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Giulia Battafarano; Michela Rossi; Viviana De Martino; Francesco Marampon; Luca Borro; Aurelio Secinaro; Andrea Del Fattore
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Clinical Application of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells to Repair Skeletal Tissue.

Authors:  Agnieszka Arthur; Stan Gronthos
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Non-viral Gene Delivery Methods for Bone and Joints.

Authors:  Benjamin Gantenbein; Shirley Tang; Julien Guerrero; Natalia Higuita-Castro; Ana I Salazar-Puerta; Andreas S Croft; Amiq Gazdhar; Devina Purmessur
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-11-19

8.  Utility of Air Bladder-Derived Nanostructured ECM for Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Jianwei Wang; Jiayu Chen; Yongfeng Ran; Qianhong He; Tao Jiang; Weixu Li; Xiaohua Yu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-15

9.  Material characterization and Streptococcus oralis adhesion on Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium surfaces used in implantology.

Authors:  Simonetta D'Ercole; Luigina Cellini; Serena Pilato; Silvia Di Lodovico; Giovanna Iezzi; Adriano Piattelli; Morena Petrini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  In situ drug release measuring in α-TCP cement by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Júnio Augusto Rodrigues Pasqual; Lucas C Freisleben; Júlio Cesar Colpo; Jose Ramón Jurado Egea; Luis Alberto Loureiro Dos Santos; Vânia Caldas de Sousa
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.