Literature DB >> 20308113

Next-generation biomedical implants using additive manufacturing of complex, cellular and functional mesh arrays.

L E Murr1, S M Gaytan, F Medina, H Lopez, E Martinez, B I Machado, D H Hernandez, L Martinez, M I Lopez, R B Wicker, J Bracke.   

Abstract

In this paper, we examine prospects for the manufacture of patient-specific biomedical implants replacing hard tissues (bone), particularly knee and hip stems and large bone (femoral) intramedullary rods, using additive manufacturing (AM) by electron beam melting (EBM). Of particular interest is the fabrication of complex functional (biocompatible) mesh arrays. Mesh elements or unit cells can be divided into different regions in order to use different cell designs in different areas of the component to produce various or continually varying (functionally graded) mesh densities. Numerous design elements have been used to fabricate prototypes by AM using EBM of Ti-6Al-4V powders, where the densities have been compared with the elastic (Young) moduli determined by resonant frequency and damping analysis. Density optimization at the bone-implant interface can allow for bone ingrowth and cementless implant components. Computerized tomography (CT) scans of metal (aluminium alloy) foam have also allowed for the building of Ti-6Al-4V foams by embedding the digital-layered scans in computer-aided design or software models for EBM. Variations in mesh complexity and especially strut (or truss) dimensions alter the cooling and solidification rate, which alters the alpha-phase (hexagonal close-packed) microstructure by creating mixtures of alpha/alpha' (martensite) observed by optical and electron metallography. Microindentation hardness measurements are characteristic of these microstructures and microstructure mixtures (alpha/alpha') and sizes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20308113     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  37 in total

Review 1.  3-dimensional printing for anterior cervical surgery: a review.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; William C H Parr; Kevin Phan; William R Walsh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

2.  Exploring for the optimal structural design for the 3D-printing technology for cranial reconstruction: a biomechanical and histological study comparison of solid vs. porous structure.

Authors:  Jun Young Lim; Namhyun Kim; Jong-Chul Park; Sun K Yoo; Dong Ah Shin; Kyu-Won Shim
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Indirect Fabrication of Lattice Metals with Thin Sections Using Centrifugal Casting.

Authors:  Jiwon Mun; Jaehyung Ju; James Thurman
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Cloud-Based Automated Design and Additive Manufacturing: A Usage Data-Enabled Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Dirk Lehmhus; Thorsten Wuest; Stefan Wellsandt; Stefan Bosse; Toshiya Kaihara; Klaus-Dieter Thoben; Matthias Busse
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Active sensing system with in situ adjustable sensor morphology.

Authors:  Surya G Nurzaman; Utku Culha; Luzius Brodbeck; Liyu Wang; Fumiya Iida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  CAD/CAM scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: investigation of biocompatibility of selective laser melted lightweight titanium.

Authors:  Hendrik Naujokat; Johanna Rohwedder; Aydin Gülses; Oral Cenk Aktas; Jörg Wiltfang; Yahya Açil
Journal:  IET Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.847

7.  A simple, low-cost conductive composite material for 3D printing of electronic sensors.

Authors:  Simon J Leigh; Robert J Bradley; Christopher P Purssell; Duncan R Billson; David A Hutchins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Next generation orthopaedic implants by additive manufacturing using electron beam melting.

Authors:  Lawrence E Murr; Sara M Gaytan; Edwin Martinez; Frank Medina; Ryan B Wicker
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-08-21

9.  Sustainability Characterization for Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Mahesh Mani; Kevin W Lyons; S K Gupta
Journal:  J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol       Date:  2014-09-22

10.  In vitro and in vivo study of additive manufactured porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds for repairing bone defects.

Authors:  Guoyuan Li; Lei Wang; Wei Pan; Fei Yang; Wenbo Jiang; Xianbo Wu; Xiangdong Kong; Kerong Dai; Yongqiang Hao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.