Literature DB >> 27656515

Outcome Analysis of Locking Plate Fixation in Proximal Humerus Fracture.

Mayank Vijayvargiya1, Abhishek Pathak2, Sanjiv Gaur3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Proximal humerus fractures account for approximately 5% of all fractures. Stable minimally displaced fractures can be treated nonoperatively but the management of displaced fractures remain controversial with various modalities of treatment available. Locking plates provide stable fixation and enable early postoperative mobilization specially in osteoporotic proximal humerus fracture. AIM: To evaluate the functional outcome of locking plate fixation and to compare the results of two approaches used for fixation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at a tertiary level hospital between September 2011 to December 2013. PHILOS plates were used for internal fixation of displaced proximal humerus fractures Neer's type 2 part, 3 part and 4 part fractures on 26 patients (M/F ratio 1.36:1; mean age 46 years). According to Neer classification, 5,12 and 9 patients had displaced 2, 3 and 4 part fractures respectively. Deltopectoral and deltoid splitting approaches were used for fixation on 13 patients each. Functional outcome was assessed using Constant-Murley shoulder score. Graphpad software version 6.0 was used with Chi-square test and Fisher-exact test are used to compare data. The p-value< 0.05 is considered significant.
RESULTS: Of the 26 patients, all fractures united radiologically and clinically and average constant score at final follow-up was 72.5. At the final follow-up 8 patients had good score, 10 patients had moderate score, 6 patients had excellent outcome and 2 patients had poor outcome according to Constant score. Mean time to union was 12.3 weeks (9 -15 weeks). Four complications (15.4%) were encountered, 2 cases of varus malunion, 1 case of wound infection which required wound debridement and 1 case of screw cut-out in which screw removal was done. Mean constant score in delto splitting approach was 70.9 and 74 in deltopectoral group (p-value= 0.54). No significant difference existed in constant score in 2 approaches. No significant difference existed between groups in terms of complications (P > .05) and all fractures were united.
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that locking plate fixation gives good functional outcomes in treatment of proximal humerus fractures. There was no significant difference in the two approaches used for exposure. Our results are comparable to various studies conducted by other authors which states that locking plates provide better functional and radiological outcomes as compared to other fixation methods like Tension band wiring, percutaneous K-wire fixation, non-locking plates, intramedullary nails.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Approach; Complication; Constant score; Osteoporosis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27656515      PMCID: PMC5028477          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18122.8281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  63 in total

1.  The treatment of subcapital humerus fracture with dynamic helix wire and the risk of concommitant lesion of the axillary nerve.

Authors:  H Traxler; R Surd; K A Laminger; A Windisch; M C Sora; W Firbas
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.414

Review 2.  Review of the surgical anatomy of the axillary nerve and the anatomic basis of its iatrogenic and traumatic injury.

Authors:  Nihal Apaydin; R Shane Tubbs; Marios Loukas; Fabrice Duparc
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Assessment and management of three-and four-part proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  J Rees; J Hicks; W Ribbans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Risk factors for proximal humerus, forearm, and wrist fractures in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study.

Authors:  T V Nguyen; J R Center; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Surgical technique.

Authors:  G Konrad; J Bayer; P Hepp; C Voigt; H Oestern; M Kääb; C Luo; M Plecko; K Wendt; W Köstler; N Südkamp
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Operative treatment of severe proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  P Paavolainen; J M Björkenheim; P Slätis; P Paukku
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1983-06

7.  Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with Polarus nail fixation.

Authors:  Julie Agel; Clifford B Jones; Anthony G Sanzone; Matthew Camuso; M Bradford Henley
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study.

Authors:  N Südkamp; J Bayer; P Hepp; C Voigt; H Oestern; M Kääb; C Luo; M Plecko; K Wendt; W Köstler; G Konrad
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Locking plates in proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  P C Strohm; P Helwig; G Konrad; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.531

Review 10.  Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christos Thanasas; George Kontakis; Antonios Angoules; David Limb; Peter Giannoudis
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  8 in total

1.  Titanium mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures for the treatment of humeral greater tuberosity fracture osteosynthesis versus PHILOS: a retrospective view.

Authors:  Gang Xue; Kapil Chahal; Thou Lim; Siyuan Hu; Shaohua Li; Jie Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Does mechanism of injury impact the outcome of operative fixation of geriatric proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Abhishek Ganta; Sara Solasz; Jack Drake; Connor Littlefield; Sanjit Konda; Kenneth Egol
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures using PHILOS Plate.

Authors:  Chintan Doshi; Gaurav Mahesh Sharma; Lokesh Gudda Naik; Krishna Sudhakar Badgire; Faisal Qureshi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-07-01

4.  Factors Influencing the Varus Deformity of Humeral Head in Proximal Humerus Fractures and Its Relation to Functional Outcome.

Authors:  H Kantharaju; Sangeet K Gawhale; G S Prasanna Kumar; Balu Sahare; Nadir Shah
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Use of a 5-item modified Fragility Index for risk stratification in patients undergoing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Daniel R Evans; Eliana B Saltzman; Albert T Anastasio; Ndeye F Guisse; Elshaday S Belay; Tyler S Pidgeon; Marc J Richard; David S Ruch; Oke A Anakwenze; Mark J Gage; Christopher S Klifto
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-12-16

6.  Minimally invasive open reduction of greater tuberosity fractures by a modified suture bridge procedure.

Authors:  Ling-Peng Kong; Juan-Juan Yang; Fu Wang; Fan-Xiao Liu; Yong-Liang Yang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Locking system strengthened by biomimetic mineralized collagen putty for the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Cheng Peng; Hai-Peng Wang; Jia-Hua Yan; Tian-Xi Song
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2017-07-21

8.  Locking Plates versus Locking Intramedullary Nails Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures Involving the Humeral Shaft: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hui Song; Tao He; Hui-Min Y Guo; Zhan-Yu Li; Min Wei; Chao Zhang; Yu-Qi Dong
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-08-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.