Literature DB >> 33995876

Factors Influencing the Varus Deformity of Humeral Head in Proximal Humerus Fractures and Its Relation to Functional Outcome.

H Kantharaju1, Sangeet K Gawhale2, G S Prasanna Kumar2, Balu Sahare2, Nadir Shah2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the proximal humerus represent approximately 4% of all fractures and 26% of humerus fractures. Proper reduction, stable internal fixation and early initiation of physiotherapy help to achieve a good functional outcome. Aim of this study was to evaluate varus fixation/malunion of proximal humerus fractures and its relation to functional outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 32 patients with proximal humerus fractures who were surgically treated between 2015 and 2017 at tertiary care hospital. We divided the patients into three groups on the basis of the neck-shaft angle as valgus group, normal group and varus group to observe the influence of neck-shaft angle on efficacy. Patients were evaluated for functional outcome using the Constant-Murley score.
RESULTS: Two-part fractures had better functional outcome (Constant score = 75.15) compared to three parts with the moderate functional outcome (Constant score = 68.81) and the four-part fracture had poor functional outcome (Constant score = 52.66). After 6 months of follow-up, 13 patients had a neck-shaft angle of less than 126°. The functional outcome is significantly better among patients with normal neck-shaft angle and had a mean Constant score of 76.63 as compared to patients with varus deformity had a mean Constant score 60 (p = 0.001). 10 patients did not have medial support, in which 08 patients had neck-shaft angle less than 126° and 2 had a normal neck-shaft angle.
CONCLUSION: High fracture comminution, improper restoration of medial continuity causes varus deformity of the humeral head and it leads to poor functional outcome. The small sample size is the limitation of our study. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fracture comminution; Functional outcome; Proximal humerus fracture; Varus fixation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33995876      PMCID: PMC8081816          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00275-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  19 in total

1.  Plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures with indirect reduction: surgical technique and results utilizing three shoulder scores.

Authors:  M Hessmann; F Baumgaertel; H Gehling; I Klingelhoeffer; L Gotzen
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Isolated fractures of the greater tuberosity in proximal humerus: does the direction of displacement influence functional outcome? An analysis of displacement in greater tuberosity fractures.

Authors:  Michele Arcangelo Verdano; Davide Aliani; Andrea Pellegrini; Paolo Baudi; Giuseppe Pedrazzi; Francesco Ceccarelli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2014-01-23

3.  The impacted varus (A2.2) proximal humeral fracture: prediction of outcome and results of nonoperative treatment in 99 patients.

Authors:  Charles M Court-Brown; Margaret M McQueen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-12

4.  Functional outcome after proximal humerus fracture fixation : understanding the risk factors.

Authors:  A Christiano; C A Pean; S Konda; K A Egol
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.500

5.  Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Dietmar Krappinger; Nicola Bizzotto; Stephan Riedmann; Christian Kammerlander; Clemens Hengg; Franz Sebastian Kralinger
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates.

Authors:  Juan Agudelo; Matthias Schürmann; Philip Stahel; Peter Helwig; Steven J Morgan; Wolfgang Zechel; Christian Bahrs; Anand Parekh; Bruce Ziran; Allison Williams; Wade Smith
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Yoram Weil; Joseph U Barker; Bryan T Kelly; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Risk factors for proximal humerus fracture.

Authors:  Sarah P Chu; Jennifer L Kelsey; Theresa H M Keegan; Barbara Sternfeld; Mila Prill; Charles P Quesenberry; Stephen Sidney
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Calcar comminution as prognostic factor of clinical outcome after locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Georg Osterhoff; Armando Hoch; Guido A Wanner; Hans-Peter Simmen; Clément M L Werner
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a locking compression plate: a retrospective evaluation of 72 patients followed for a minimum of 1 year.

Authors:  Jan-Magnus Björkenheim; Jarkko Pajarinen; Vesa Savolainen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.