Literature DB >> 19487508

Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study.

N Südkamp1, J Bayer, P Hepp, C Voigt, H Oestern, M Kääb, C Luo, M Plecko, K Wendt, W Köstler, G Konrad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment of unstable displaced proximal humeral fractures, especially in the elderly, remains controversial. The objective of the present prospective, multicenter, observational study was to evaluate the functional outcome and the complication rate after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of a locking proximal humeral plate.
METHODS: One hundred and eighty-seven patients (mean age, 62.9 +/- 15.7 years) with an acute proximal humeral fracture were managed with open reduction and internal fixation with a locking proximal humeral plate. At the three-month, six-month, and one-year follow-up examinations, 165 (88%), 158 (84%), and 155 (83%) of the 187 patients were assessed with regard to pain, shoulder mobility, and strength. The Constant score was determined at each interval, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was determined for the injured and contralateral extremities at the time of the one-year follow-up.
RESULTS: Between three months and one year, the mean range of motion and the mean Constant score for the injured shoulders improved substantially. Twelve months after surgery, the mean Constant score for the injured side was 70.6 +/- 13.7 points, corresponding to 85.1% +/- 14.0% of the score for the contralateral side. The mean DASH score at the time of the one-year follow-up was 15.2 +/- 16.8 points. Sixty-two complications were encountered in fifty-two (34%) of 155 patients at the time of the one-year follow-up. Twenty-five complications (40%) were related to incorrect surgical technique and were present at the end of the operative procedure. The most common complication, noted in twenty-one (14%) of 155 patients, was intraoperative screw perforation of the humeral head. Twenty-nine patients (19%) had an unplanned second operation within twelve months after the fracture.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humeral plate that was evaluated in the present study can lead to a good functional outcome provided that the correct surgical technique is used. Because many of the complications were related to incorrect surgical technique, it behooves the treating surgeon to perform the operation correctly to avoid iatrogenic errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19487508     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  137 in total

1.  Open reduction and internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty in the management of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Robert Thorsness; James Iannuzzi; Katia Noyes; Stephen Kates; Ilya Voloshin
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

2.  Surgical treatment of Neer Group VI proximal humeral fractures: retrospective comparison of PHILOS® and hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Spross; Andreas Platz; Matthias Erschbamer; Thomas Lattmann; Michael Dietrich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  [Fractures of the humerus head].

Authors:  M Jaeger; K Izadpanah; D Maier; K Reising; P C Strohm; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Comparison of two different locking plates for two-, three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures--results of an international multicentre study.

Authors:  Gerhard Konrad; Anja Hirschmüller; Laurent Audige; Simon Lambert; Ralf Hertel; Norbert P Südkamp
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  [Update on shoulder surgery 2010: current treatment strategies for traumatic lesions of the shoulder].

Authors:  M Wellmann; P Habermeyer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  Fixed angle locking plates for proximal humeral fracture fixation.

Authors:  S Sinha; C P Kelly
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  [Technique and value of arthroscopic implant removal in the shoulder].

Authors:  H Lill; C Katthagen; C Voigt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in proximal humeral fractures: one-year results of a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Francesco Falez; Matteo Papalia; Alessandro Greco; Antonio Teti; Fabio Favetti; Gabriele Panegrossi; Filippo Casella; Stefano Necozione
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Deltoid-split or deltopectoral approaches for the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures?

Authors:  Benjamin Buecking; Juliane Mohr; Benjamin Bockmann; Ralph Zettl; Steffen Ruchholtz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Open reduction internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Marschall B Berkes; Milton T M Little; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.