Literature DB >> 27656028

Slow Temporal Integration Enables Robust Neural Coding and Perception of a Cue to Sound Source Location.

Andrew D Brown1, Daniel J Tollin2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In mammals, localization of sound sources in azimuth depends on sensitivity to interaural differences in sound timing (ITD) and level (ILD). Paradoxically, while typical ILD-sensitive neurons of the auditory brainstem require millisecond synchrony of excitatory and inhibitory inputs for the encoding of ILDs, human and animal behavioral ILD sensitivity is robust to temporal stimulus degradations (e.g., interaural decorrelation due to reverberation), or, in humans, bilateral clinical device processing. Here we demonstrate that behavioral ILD sensitivity is only modestly degraded with even complete decorrelation of left- and right-ear signals, suggesting the existence of a highly integrative ILD-coding mechanism. Correspondingly, we find that a majority of auditory midbrain neurons in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (of chinchilla) effectively encode ILDs despite complete decorrelation of left- and right-ear signals. We show that such responses can be accounted for by relatively long windows of bilateral excitatory-inhibitory interaction, which we explicitly measure using trains of narrowband clicks. Neural and behavioral data are compared with the outputs of a simple model of ILD processing with a single free parameter, the duration of excitatory-inhibitory interaction. Behavioral, neural, and modeling data collectively suggest that ILD sensitivity depends on binaural integration of excitation and inhibition within a ≳3 ms temporal window, significantly longer than observed in lower brainstem neurons. This relatively slow integration potentiates a unique role for the ILD system in spatial hearing that may be of particular importance when informative ITD cues are unavailable. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In mammalian hearing, interaural differences in the timing (ITD) and level (ILD) of impinging sounds carry critical information about source location. However, natural sounds are often decorrelated between the ears by reverberation and background noise, degrading the fidelity of both ITD and ILD cues. Here we demonstrate that behavioral ILD sensitivity (in humans) and neural ILD sensitivity (in single neurons of the chinchilla auditory midbrain) remain robust under stimulus conditions that render ITD cues undetectable. This result can be explained by "slow" temporal integration arising from several-millisecond-long windows of excitatory-inhibitory interaction evident in midbrain, but not brainstem, neurons. Such integrative coding can account for the preservation of ILD sensitivity despite even extreme temporal degradations in ecological acoustic stimuli.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/369908-14$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binaural hearing; interaural decorrelation; interaural level difference; sound localization; temporal integration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27656028      PMCID: PMC5030352          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1421-16.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  55 in total

1.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

2.  Mechanisms underlying the sensitivity of neurons in the lateral superior olive to interaural intensity differences.

Authors:  D R Irvine; V N Park; L McCormick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The coding of spatial location by single units in the lateral superior olive of the cat. I. Spatial receptive fields in azimuth.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Reversible inactivation of the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus reveals its role in the processing of multiple sound sources in the inferior colliculus of bats.

Authors:  R M Burger; G D Pollak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Contribution of the commissure of Probst to binaural evoked responses in the rat's inferior colliculus: interaural time differences.

Authors:  B A van Adel; S A Kidd; J B Kelly
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  The lateral superior olive: a functional role in sound source localization.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.519

7.  Interaural level differences and the level-meter model.

Authors:  William M Hartmann; Zachary A Constan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of binaural decorrelation on neural and behavioral processing of interaural level differences in the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Authors:  S E Egnor
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Binaural interaction in the lateral superior olive: time difference sensitivity studied in mouse brain slice.

Authors:  S H Wu; J B Kelly
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Neural correlates of the precedence effect in the inferior colliculus of behaving cats.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Luis C Populin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  The Calyx of Held: A Hypothesis on the Need for Reliable Timing in an Intensity-Difference Encoder.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Laurence O Trussell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Representation of Multidimensional Stimuli: Quantifying the Most Informative Stimulus Dimension from Neural Responses.

Authors:  Victor Benichoux; Andrew D Brown; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Across-channel interaural-level-difference processing demonstrates frequency dependence.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Olga A Stakhovskaya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Kyle Easter; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spatial variation in signal and sensory precision both constrain auditory acuity at high frequencies.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Victor Benichoux; Heath G Jones; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Across Species "Natural Ablation" Reveals the Brainstem Source of a Noninvasive Biomarker of Binaural Hearing.

Authors:  Victor Benichoux; Alexander Ferber; Samuel Hunt; Ethan Hughes; Daniel Tollin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Between-ear sound frequency disparity modulates a brain stem biomarker of binaural hearing.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Jesse I Gilmer; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The effect of target and interferer frequency on across-frequency binaural interference of interaural-level-difference sensitivity.

Authors:  Beth Rosen; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Specific loss of neural sensitivity to interaural time difference of unmodulated noise stimuli following noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Hariprakash Haragopal; Ryan Dorkoski; Austin R Pollard; Gareth A Whaley; Timothy R Wohl; Noelle C Stroud; Mitchell L Day
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Effects of interaural decoherence on sensitivity to interaural level differences across frequency.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.