Literature DB >> 30326382

Spatial variation in signal and sensory precision both constrain auditory acuity at high frequencies.

Andrew D Brown1, Victor Benichoux2, Heath G Jones3, Kelsey L Anbuhl4, Daniel J Tollin5.   

Abstract

Sensory performance is constrained by the information in the stimulus and the precision of the involved sensory system(s). Auditory spatial acuity is robust across a broad range of sound frequencies and source locations, but declines at eccentric lateral angles. The basis of such variation is not fully understood. Low-frequency auditory spatial acuity is mediated by sensitivity to interaural time difference (ITD) cues. While low-frequency spatial acuity varies across azimuth and some physiological models predict strong medial bias in the precision of ITD sensitivity, human psychophysical ITD sensitivity appears to vary only slightly with reference ITD magnitude. Correspondingly, recent analyses suggest that spatial variation in human low-frequency acuity is well-accounted for by acoustic factors alone. Here we examine the matter of high-frequency auditory acuity, which is mediated by sensitivity to interaural level difference (ILD) cues. Using two different psychophysical tasks in human subjects, we demonstrate decreasing ILD acuity with increasing ILD magnitude. We then demonstrate that the multiplicative combination of spatially variant sensory precision and physical cue information (local slope of the ILD cue) provides improved prediction of classic high-frequency spatial acuity data. Finally, we consider correlates of magnitude dependent acuity in neurons that are sensitive to ILDs.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory acuity; Interaural level difference; Interaural time difference; Sound localization; Spatial hearing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30326382      PMCID: PMC6240474          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  40 in total

1.  Auditory localization of nearby sources. Head-related transfer functions.

Authors:  D S Brungart; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka; David McAlpine
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Relative sound localisation abilities in human listeners.

Authors:  Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Difference thresholds for interaural delay.

Authors:  E R Hafter; J De Maio; W S Hellman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Representation of Multidimensional Stimuli: Quantifying the Most Informative Stimulus Dimension from Neural Responses.

Authors:  Victor Benichoux; Andrew D Brown; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Binaural interaction in high-frequency neurons in inferior colliculus of the cat: effects of variations in sound pressure level on sensitivity to interaural intensity differences.

Authors:  D R Irvine; G Gago
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Six Degrees of Auditory Spatial Separation.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Alex Fox; Emily Orchard-Mills; Johahn Leung; David Alais
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-31

8.  On the minimum audible angle--a decision theory approach.

Authors:  W M Hartmann; B Raked
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency.

Authors:  W A Yost; R H Dye
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Difference thresholds for interaural intensity.

Authors:  E R Hafter; R H Dye; J M Nuetzel; H Aronow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Jose L Peña; Fanny Cazettes; Michael V Beckert; Brian J Fischer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effects of interaural decoherence on sensitivity to interaural level differences across frequency.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  The barn owls' Minimum Audible Angle.

Authors:  Bianca Krumm; Georg M Klump; Christine Köppl; Ulrike Langemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Binaural-cue Weighting and Training-Induced Reweighting Across Frequencies.

Authors:  Maike Klingel; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

5.  Natural ITD statistics predict human auditory spatial perception.

Authors:  Rodrigo Pavão; Elyse S Sussman; Brian J Fischer; José L Peña
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Transmission of Binaural Cues by Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Examining the Impacts of Bilaterally Independent Spectral Peak-Picking, Pulse Timing, and Compression.

Authors:  William O Gray; Paul G Mayo; Matthew J Goupell; Andrew D Brown
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.