Literature DB >> 28663198

Representation of Multidimensional Stimuli: Quantifying the Most Informative Stimulus Dimension from Neural Responses.

Victor Benichoux1, Andrew D Brown2, Kelsey L Anbuhl2,3, Daniel J Tollin2,3,4.   

Abstract

A common way to assess the function of sensory neurons is to measure the number of spikes produced by individual neurons while systematically varying a given dimension of the stimulus. Such measured tuning curves can then be used to quantify the accuracy of the neural representation of the stimulus dimension under study, which can in turn be related to behavioral performance. However, tuning curves often change shape when other dimensions of the stimulus are varied, reflecting the simultaneous sensitivity of neurons to multiple stimulus features. Here we illustrate how one-dimensional information analyses are misleading in this context, and propose a framework derived from Fisher information that allows the quantification of information carried by neurons in multidimensional stimulus spaces. We use this method to probe the representation of sound localization in auditory neurons of chinchillas and guinea pigs of both sexes, and show how heterogeneous tuning properties contribute to a representation of sound source position that is robust to changes in sound level.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Sensory neurons' responses are typically modulated simultaneously by numerous stimulus properties, which can result in an overestimation of neural acuity with existing one-dimensional neural information transmission measures. To overcome this limitation, we develop new, compact expressions of Fisher information-derived measures that bound the robust encoding of separate stimulus dimensions in the context of multidimensional stimuli. We apply this method to the problem of the representation of sound source location in the face of changes in sound source level by neurons of the auditory midbrain.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/377332-15$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fisher information; ILD; binaural hearing; multidimensional; neural coding

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28663198      PMCID: PMC5546106          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0318-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  78 in total

1.  Single-unit responses in the inferior colliculus of decerebrate cats. II. Sensitivity to interaural level differences.

Authors:  K A Davis; R Ramachandran; B J May
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Localization of brief sounds: effects of level and background noise.

Authors:  E A Macpherson; J C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance.

Authors:  K H Britten; M N Shadlen; W T Newsome; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Interaural level difference processing in the lateral superior olive and the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Thomas J Park; Achim Klug; Michael Holinstat; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Jeffrey M Beck; Peter E Latham; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  A simple approach to ignoring irrelevant variables by population decoding based on multisensory neurons.

Authors:  HyungGoo R Kim; Xaq Pitkow; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Response of high-frequency inferior colliculus neurons to interaural intensity differences.

Authors:  R D Stillman
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Binaural processing of sound pressure level in cat primary auditory cortex: evidence for a representation based on absolute levels rather than interaural level differences.

Authors:  M N Semple; L M Kitzes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Decoding sound source location and separation using neural population activity patterns.

Authors:  Mitchell L Day; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Contribution of correlated noise and selective decoding to choice probability measurements in extrastriate visual cortex.

Authors:  Yong Gu; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  5 in total

1.  Stimulus-frequency-dependent dominance of sound localization cues across the cochleotopic map of the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Ryan Dorkoski; Kenneth E Hancock; Gareth A Whaley; Timothy R Wohl; Noelle C Stroud; Mitchell L Day
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Closed-Loop Estimation of Retinal Network Sensitivity by Local Empirical Linearization.

Authors:  Ulisse Ferrari; Christophe Gardella; Olivier Marre; Thierry Mora
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-01-23

3.  Establishing an Animal Model of Single-Sided Deafness in Chinchilla lanigera.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Nathaniel T Greene; Victor Benichoux; Anna Dondzillo; Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Spatial variation in signal and sensory precision both constrain auditory acuity at high frequencies.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Victor Benichoux; Heath G Jones; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The transverse occipital sulcus and intraparietal sulcus show neural selectivity to object-scene size relationships.

Authors:  Lauren E Welbourne; Aditya Jonnalagadda; Barry Giesbrecht; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.