Literature DB >> 27647261

Activating Patients With a Tailored Bone Density Test Results Letter and Educational Brochure: the PAADRN Randomized Controlled Trial.

Fredric D Wolinsky1, Yiyue Lou2, Stephanie W Edmonds3, Sylvie F Hall4, Michael P Jones2, Nicole C Wright5, Kenneth G Saag6, Peter Cram7, Douglas W Roblin8.   

Abstract

In cross-sectional studies, patient activation has been associated with better health behaviors, health outcomes, and health-care experiences. Moreover, tailored interventions have led to clinically meaningful improvements in patient activation, as well as health outcomes over time. We tested whether a tailored patient-activation letter communicating bone mineral density (BMD) test results plus an educational brochure improved patient activation scores and levels at 12 and 52 wk post-baseline as the mechanism leading to enhanced bone healthcare. In a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, multicenter pragmatic clinical trial, we randomized 7749 patients ≥50 yr old and presenting for BMD testing at 3 medical centers in the United States between February 2012 and August 2014. The outcome measures were patient activation scores and levels based on 6 items taken from the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) that were administered at the baseline, 12-wk, and 52-wk follow-up interviews. Mean age was 66.6 yr, 83.8% were women, and 75.3% were Non-Hispanic-Whites. Overall, PAM activation scores improved from 58.1 at baseline to 76.4 by 12 wk (p < 0.001) and to 77.2 (p = 0.002) by 52 wk post-baseline. These improvements, however, were not significantly different between the intervention and usual care groups (18.7 vs 18.1, p = 0.176, at 12 wk) in intention-to-treat analyses. PAM activation scores and levels substantially improved at 12 wk and 52 wk, but no differences were observed in these improvements between the intervention and usual care groups. These null findings may have occurred because the tailoring focused on the patient's BMD and fracture risk results, rather than on the patient's BMD and fracture risk results as well as the patient's baseline PAM activation scores or levels.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone density testing; clinical trial; osteoporosis; patient activation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27647261      PMCID: PMC5354993          DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  28 in total

1.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Closing the gap in postfracture care at the population level: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Lisa LaBine; Penny Klassen; Darlene Dreilich; Patricia A Caetano
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sumit R Majumdar; Jeffrey A Johnson; Finlay A McAlister; Debbie Bellerose; Anthony S Russell; David A Hanley; Don W Morrish; Walter P Maksymowych; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Disparities in osteoporosis treatments.

Authors:  Z Liu; J Weaver; A de Papp; Z Li; J Martin; K Allen; S Hui; E A Imel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The PAADRN study: a design for a randomized controlled practical clinical trial to improve bone health.

Authors:  Stephanie W Edmonds; Fredric D Wolinsky; Alan J Christensen; Xin Lu; Michael P Jones; Douglas W Roblin; Kenneth G Saag; Peter Cram
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Community based intervention to optimize osteoporosis management: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Patricia M Ciaschini; Sharon E Straus; Lisa R Dolovich; Ron A Goeree; Karen M Leung; Carol R Woods; Greg M Zimmerman; Sumit R Majumdar; Silvana Spadafora; Luke A Fera; Hui N Lee
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Improving bone mineral density reporting to patients with an illustration of personal fracture risk.

Authors:  Stephanie W Edmonds; Peter Cram; Xin Lu; Douglas W Roblin; Nicole C Wright; Kenneth G Saag; Samantha L Solimeo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; C Cooper; R Rizzoli; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Developing a bone mineral density test result letter to send to patients: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Stephanie W Edmonds; Samantha L Solimeo; Xin Lu; Douglas W Roblin; Kenneth G Saag; Peter Cram
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.711

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sex differences in osteoporosis self-efficacy among community-residing older adults presenting for DXA.

Authors:  S L Solimeo; V-T T Nguyen; S W Edmonds; Y Lou; D W Roblin; K G Saag; P Cram; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Racial Differences and Disparities in Osteoporosis-related Bone Health: Results From the PAADRN Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Kenneth G Saag; Yiyue Lou; Stephanie W Edmonds; Sylvie F Hall; Douglas W Roblin; Nicole C Wright; Michael P Jones; Fredric D Wolinsky
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Patient-reported reasons for nonadherence to recommended osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Sylvie F Hall; Stephanie W Edmonds; Yiyue Lou; Peter Cram; Douglas W Roblin; Kenneth G Saag; Nicole C Wright; Michael P Jones; Fredric D Wolinsky
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2017-06-08

4.  Evaluation of a Multimodal, Direct-to-Patient Educational Intervention Targeting Barriers to Osteoporosis Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Maria I Danila; Ryan C Outman; Elizabeth J Rahn; Amy S Mudano; David T Redden; Peng Li; Jeroan J Allison; Fred A Anderson; Allison Wyman; Susan L Greenspan; Andrea Z LaCroix; Jeri W Nieves; Stuart L Silverman; Ethel S Siris; Nelson B Watts; Michael J Miller; Jeffrey R Curtis; Amy H Warriner; Nicole C Wright; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Effective communication regarding risk of fracture for individuals at risk of fragility fracture: a scoping review.

Authors:  Charlotte Beaudart; Mickael Hiligsmann; Nannan Li; E Michael Lewiecki; Stuart Silverman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.507

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.