Literature DB >> 28288074

Racial Differences and Disparities in Osteoporosis-related Bone Health: Results From the PAADRN Randomized Controlled Trial.

Peter Cram1, Kenneth G Saag, Yiyue Lou, Stephanie W Edmonds, Sylvie F Hall, Douglas W Roblin, Nicole C Wright, Michael P Jones, Fredric D Wolinsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Determining whether observed differences in health care can be called disparities requires persistence of differences after adjustment for relevant patient, provider, and health system factors. We examined whether providing dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test results directly to patients might reduce or eliminate racial differences in osteoporosis-related health care. DESIGN, SUBJECTS, AND MEASURES: We analyzed data from 3484 white and 1041 black women who underwent DXA testing at 2 health systems participating in the Patient Activation after DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) pragmatic clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT-01507662) between February 2012 and August 2014. We examined 7 outcomes related to bone health at 12 weeks and 52 weeks post-DXA: (1) whether the patient correctly identified their DXA baseline results; (2) whether the patient was on guideline-concordant osteoporosis pharmacotherapy; (3) osteoporosis-related satisfaction; (4) osteoporosis knowledge; (5 and 6) osteoporosis self-efficacy for exercise and for diet; and (7) patient activation. We examined whether unadjusted differences in outcomes between whites and blacks persisted after adjusting for patient, provider, and health system factors.
RESULTS: Mean age was 66.5 years and 29% were black. At baseline black women had less education, poorer health status, and were less likely to report a history of osteoporosis (P<0.001 for all). In unadjusted analyses black women were less likely to correctly identify their actual DXA results, more likely to be on guideline-concordant therapy, and had similar patient activation. After adjustment for patient demographics, baseline health status and other factors, black women were still less likely to know their actual DXA result and less likely to be on guideline-concordant therapy, but black women had greater patient activation.
CONCLUSIONS: Adjustment for patient and provider level factors can change how racial differences are viewed, unmasking new disparities, and providing explanations for others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28288074      PMCID: PMC5432397          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  24 in total

1.  Racial disparity in treatment of osteoporosis after diagnosis.

Authors:  I Hamrick; L M Whetstone; D M Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Recent trends in hip fracture rates by race/ethnicity among older US adults.

Authors:  Nicole C Wright; Kenneth G Saag; Jeffrey R Curtis; Wilson K Smith; Meredith L Kilgore; Michael A Morrisey; Huifeng Yun; Jie Zhang; Elizabeth S Delzell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Hip Fracture Care.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Joseph M Lane; Ting Jung Pan; Michael L Parks; Stephen Lyman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Estimated prevalence and patterns of presumed osteoporosis among older Americans based on Medicare data.

Authors:  H Cheng; L C Gary; J R Curtis; K G Saag; M L Kilgore; M A Morrisey; R Matthews; W Smith; H Yun; E Delzell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  An outreach program improved osteoporosis management after a fracture.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; William M Vollmer; David H Smith; Amanda Petrik; Jennifer Schneider; Harry Glauber; Michael Herson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 6.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The PAADRN study: a design for a randomized controlled practical clinical trial to improve bone health.

Authors:  Stephanie W Edmonds; Fredric D Wolinsky; Alan J Christensen; Xin Lu; Michael P Jones; Douglas W Roblin; Kenneth G Saag; Peter Cram
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Improving bone mineral density reporting to patients with an illustration of personal fracture risk.

Authors:  Stephanie W Edmonds; Peter Cram; Xin Lu; Douglas W Roblin; Nicole C Wright; Kenneth G Saag; Samantha L Solimeo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Activation of persons living with HIV for treatment, the great study.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Michele Boyd; Julian Brown; Jennifer Carroll; Andrea Cassells; Roberto Corales; Wendi Cross; Nayef El'Daher; Subrina Farah; Steven Fine; Richard Fowler; Ashley Hann; Amneris Luque; Jennifer Rodriquez; Mechelle Sanders; Jonathan Tobin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Developing a bone mineral density test result letter to send to patients: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Stephanie W Edmonds; Samantha L Solimeo; Xin Lu; Douglas W Roblin; Kenneth G Saag; Peter Cram
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.711

View more
  2 in total

1.  Race Plays a Role in the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs of Women with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nicole C Wright; Mary E Melton; Maira Sohail; Ivan Herbey; Susan Davies; Emily B Levitan; Kenneth G Saag; Natalia V Ivankova
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-02-11

Review 2.  Osteoporosis care amidst the prolonged pandemic.

Authors:  R R Narla; R A Adler
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 4.256

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.