Literature DB >> 23085132

The PAADRN study: a design for a randomized controlled practical clinical trial to improve bone health.

Stephanie W Edmonds1, Fredric D Wolinsky, Alan J Christensen, Xin Lu, Michael P Jones, Douglas W Roblin, Kenneth G Saag, Peter Cram.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To describe the rationale and design of an NIH funded randomized controlled trial: the Patient Activation after DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) study. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the effect that a direct mailing of Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) results from bone density testing centers to patients will have on patients' knowledge, treatment and self-efficacy.
METHODS: We will enroll approximately 7500 patients presenting for DXA at three study sites, the University of Iowa, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Kaiser Permanente of Atlanta, Georgia. We will randomize providers (and their respective patients) to either the intervention arm or usual care. Patients randomized to the intervention group will receive a letter with their DXA results and an educational brochure, while those randomized to usual care will receive their DXA results according to standard practice. The seven discrete outcomes are changes from baseline to 12-weeks and/or 52-weeks post-DXA in: (1) guideline concordant pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapy; (2) knowledge of DXA results; (3) osteoporosis-specific knowledge; (4) general health-related quality of life; (5) satisfaction with bone-related health care, (6) patient activation; and, (7) osteoporosis-specific self-efficacy.
CONCLUSION: This trial will offer evidence of the impact of a novel approach-direct-to-patient mailing of test results-to improve patient activation in their bone health care. The results will inform clinical practice for the communication of DXA and other test results.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23085132      PMCID: PMC3525745          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  50 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Mark S Roberts; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Characteristics and predictors of missed opportunities in lung cancer diagnosis: an electronic health record-based study.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Kamal Hirani; Himabindu Kadiyala; Olga Rudomiotov; Traber Davis; Myrna M Khan; Terry L Wahls
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Health Beliefs about Osteoporosis and Osteoporosis Screening in Older Women and Men.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Mark S Roberts; Chung-Chou H Chang; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  Health Educ J       Date:  2010-09

6.  Mammography result notification letters: are they easy to read and understand?

Authors:  Erin N Marcus; Lee M Sanders; Margaret Pereyra; Yanisa Del Toro; Ada Pat Romilly; Monica Yepes; Monica Webb Hooper; Beth A Jones
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 7.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sumit R Majumdar; Jeffrey A Johnson; Finlay A McAlister; Debbie Bellerose; Anthony S Russell; David A Hanley; Don W Morrish; Walter P Maksymowych; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Adrianne Feldstein; Patricia J Elmer; David H Smith; Michael Herson; Eric Orwoll; Chuhe Chen; Mikel Aickin; Martha C Swain
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Improving care of patients at-risk for osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon; Jennifer M Polinski; Margaret Stedman; Colleen Truppo; Laura Breiner; Catherine Egan; Saira Jan; Minal Patel; Thomas W Weiss; Ya-ting Chen; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  21 in total

1.  Understanding Preferences for Osteoporosis Information to Develop an Osteoporosis Patient Education Brochure.

Authors:  Stephanie W Edmonds; Samantha L Solimeo; Vu-Thuy Nguyen; Nicole C Wright; Douglas W Roblin; Kenneth G Saag; Peter Cram
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2016-11-18

2.  Race Plays a Role in the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs of Women with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nicole C Wright; Mary E Melton; Maira Sohail; Ivan Herbey; Susan Davies; Emily B Levitan; Kenneth G Saag; Natalia V Ivankova
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-02-11

3.  Sex differences in osteoporosis self-efficacy among community-residing older adults presenting for DXA.

Authors:  S L Solimeo; V-T T Nguyen; S W Edmonds; Y Lou; D W Roblin; K G Saag; P Cram; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Pragmatic Clinical Trials in Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Giovanni Adami; Kenneth G Saag; Maria I Danila
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  The cost of a patient activation intervention for achieving successful outcomes: results from the PAADRN randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  F D Wolinsky; S F Hall; Y Lou; S W Edmonds; K G Saag; D W Roblin; N C Wright; M P Jones; P Cram; J R Curtis; S L Morgan; J A Schlechte; J H Williams; D J Zelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change of the "Osteoporosis and You" knowledge scale.

Authors:  V T Nguyen; S W Edmonds; Y Lou; D W Roblin; K G Saag; P Cram; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Racial Differences and Disparities in Osteoporosis-related Bone Health: Results From the PAADRN Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Kenneth G Saag; Yiyue Lou; Stephanie W Edmonds; Sylvie F Hall; Douglas W Roblin; Nicole C Wright; Michael P Jones; Fredric D Wolinsky
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Patient Preferences for Test Result Notification.

Authors:  Samuel K Shultz; Robert Wu; John J Matelski; Xin Lu; Peter Cram
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Activating Patients With a Tailored Bone Density Test Results Letter and Educational Brochure: the PAADRN Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Fredric D Wolinsky; Yiyue Lou; Stephanie W Edmonds; Sylvie F Hall; Michael P Jones; Nicole C Wright; Kenneth G Saag; Peter Cram; Douglas W Roblin
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Patient-activation and guideline-concordant pharmacological treatment after bone density testing: the PAADRN randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  P Cram; F D Wolinsky; Y Lou; S W Edmonds; S F Hall; D W Roblin; N C Wright; M P Jones; K G Saag
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.