Literature DB >> 28602783

Patient-reported reasons for nonadherence to recommended osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.

Sylvie F Hall, Stephanie W Edmonds, Yiyue Lou, Peter Cram, Douglas W Roblin, Kenneth G Saag, Nicole C Wright, Michael P Jones, Fredric D Wolinsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: As many as one-half of patients recommended for osteoporosis pharmacotherapy do not take their medications. To identify intervention targets, we examined patient characteristics associated with nonadherence to recommended pharmacotherapy and their reasons for nonadherence.
METHODS: Data come from the Patient Activation after DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) study, a randomized controlled trial of 7749 patients aged 50 years or older presenting for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at 3 health centers in the United States. We focused on the 790 patients who reported receiving a recommendation for new pharmacotherapy at baseline. Using Pearson chi-squared tests for categorical variables, 2-sample t tests for continuous variables, and multivariable multinomial logistic regression, we compared those who reported starting the recommended medication (adherers) with temporary nonadherers and nonadherers on demographics, health habits, DXA impression, 10-year probability of fracture using the assessment tool, and osteoporosis knowledge, and we examined their stated reasons for nonadherence.
RESULTS: Mean age was 66.8 years (SD = 8.9); 87.2% were women, and 84.2% were white. One-fourth of patients (24.8%) reported that they did not start their recommended pharmacotherapy. In the unadjusted analyses, the only factor significantly associated with nonadherence was osteoporosis knowledge, with those having better knowledge being less likely to take their medications (P < 0.05). The most common reasons for nonadherence were fear of adverse effects (53.3%), a dislike of taking medicine (25.3%), and the belief that the medication would not help their condition (16.7%).
CONCLUSION: One in 4 patients recommended for osteoporosis pharmacotherapy declined treatment because they feared potential adverse effects, did not like taking medicine, or believed that the medication would not help their condition. Improved patient counseling on the potential adverse effects of osteoporosis treatment and the risk-benefit ratio for these medications may increase adherence.
Copyright © 2017 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28602783      PMCID: PMC5515491          DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)        ISSN: 1086-5802


  47 in total

1.  Improving adherence and clinical outcomes through an HIV pharmacist's interventions.

Authors:  Angela Ma; David M Chen; Fern M Chau; Parya Saberi
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2010-10

2.  Patients' beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness.

Authors:  R Horne; J Weinman
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 3.  Effectiveness of interventions by community pharmacists to improve patient adherence to chronic medication: a systematic review.

Authors:  Boris Lg Van Wijk; Olaf H Klungel; Eibert R Heerdink; Anthonius de Boer
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Assessing the effectiveness of pharmacy-based adherence interventions on antiretroviral adherence in persons with HIV.

Authors:  Kevin C Henderson; Jason Hindman; Steven C Johnson; Robert J Valuck; Jennifer J Kiser
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.078

5.  The impact of osteoporosis medication beliefs and side-effect experiences on non-adherence to oral bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Colleen A McHorney; John T Schousboe; Richard R Cline; Thomas W Weiss
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.580

6.  Predictors of adherence to diabetes medications: the role of disease and medication beliefs.

Authors:  Devin M Mann; Diego Ponieman; Howard Leventhal; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-01-30

7.  Maternal predictors of neonatal bone size and geometry: the Southampton Women's Survey.

Authors:  N C Harvey; M K Javaid; N K Arden; J R Poole; S R Crozier; S M Robinson; H M Inskip; K M Godfrey; E M Dennison; C Cooper
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Differences in persistence among different weekly oral bisphosphonate medications.

Authors:  O Sheehy; C M Kindundu; M Barbeau; J LeLorier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Diabetes transitional care from inpatient to outpatient setting: pharmacist discharge counseling.

Authors:  Mansi Shah; CaTanya A Norwood; Sol Farias; Sonia Ibrahim; Pang H Chong; Leon Fogelfeld
Journal:  J Pharm Pract       Date:  2012-07-13

10.  Improving bone mineral density reporting to patients with an illustration of personal fracture risk.

Authors:  Stephanie W Edmonds; Peter Cram; Xin Lu; Douglas W Roblin; Nicole C Wright; Kenneth G Saag; Samantha L Solimeo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of factors affecting medication adherence among patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  C T Yeam; S Chia; H C C Tan; Y H Kwan; W Fong; J J B Seng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  M S LeBoff; S L Greenspan; K L Insogna; E M Lewiecki; K G Saag; A J Singer; E S Siris
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.071

3.  At Odds About the Odds: Women's Choices to Accept Osteoporosis Medications Do Not Closely Agree with Physician-Set Treatment Thresholds.

Authors:  Emma O Billington; A Lynn Feasel; Gregory A Kline
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Expressed information needs of patients with osteoporosis and/or fragility fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Grace Raybould; Opeyemi Babatunde; Amy L Evans; Joanne L Jordan; Zoe Paskins
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.617

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.