Literature DB >> 18299546

Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trial.

Sumit R Majumdar1, Jeffrey A Johnson, Finlay A McAlister, Debbie Bellerose, Anthony S Russell, David A Hanley, Don W Morrish, Walter P Maksymowych, Brian H Rowe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older patients who experience a fragility fracture are at high risk of future fractures but are rarely tested or treated for osteoporosis. We developed a multifaceted intervention directed at older patients with wrist fractures (in the form of telephone-based education) and their physicians (in the form of guidelines endorsed by opinion leaders, supported by reminders) to improve the quality of osteoporosis care.
METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial with blinded ascertainment of outcomes, we compared our intervention with usual care (provision of printed educational materials to patients). Eligible patients were those older than 50 years of age who had experienced a wrist fracture and were seen in emergency departments and fracture clinics; we excluded those who were already being treated for osteoporosis. The primary outcome was bisphosphonate treatment within 6 months after the fracture. Secondary outcomes included bone mineral density testing, "appropriate care" (consisting of bone mineral density testing with treatment if bone mass was low) and quality of life.
RESULTS: We screened 795 patients for eligibility and randomly assigned 272 to the intervention (137 patients) or control (135 patients) group. The median age was 60 years; 210 (77%) of the subjects were women, and 130 (48%) reported a previous fracture as an adult. Six months after the fracture, 30 (22%) of the intervention patients, as compared with 10 (7%) of the control patients, were receiving bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis (adjusted relative risk [RR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-5.1, p = 0.008). Intervention patients were more likely than control patients to undergo bone mineral density testing (71/137 [52%] v. 24/135 [18%]; adjusted RR 2.8, 95% CI 1.9-4.2, p < 0.001) and to receive appropriate care (52/137 [38%] v. 15/135 [11%]; adjusted RR 3.1, 95% CI 1.8-5.3, p < 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in other outcomes. One patient died, and 4 others experienced recurrent fracture.
INTERPRETATION: A multifaceted intervention directed at high-risk patients and their physicians substantially increased rates of testing and treatment for osteoporosis. Nevertheless, more than half of the patients in the intervention group were not receiving appropriate care 6 months after their fracture, which suggests that additional strategies should be explored. (ClinicalTrials.gov trial register no. NCT00152321.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18299546      PMCID: PMC2244663          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.070981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  25 in total

1.  Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG)

Authors:  P L Hudak; P C Amadio; C Bombardier
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

Authors:  J Ware; M Kosinski; S D Keller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Osteoporosis in older men: knowledge and health beliefs.

Authors:  C A Sedlak; M O Doheny; P J Estok
Journal:  Orthop Nurs       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.913

4.  Quality of health care. Part 2: measuring quality of care.

Authors:  R H Brook; E A McGlynn; P D Cleary
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-09-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Development and validation of a discriminative quality of life questionnaire for osteoporosis (the OPTQoL).

Authors:  E Lydick; S I Zimmerman; B Yawn; B Love; M Kleerekoper; P Ross; A Martin; R Holmes
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review.

Authors:  V Elliot-Gibson; E R Bogoch; S A Jamal; D E Beaton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Bone mineral density measurement and treatment for osteoporosis in older individuals with fractures: a gap in evidence-based practice guideline implementation.

Authors:  Adrianne Feldstein; Patricia J Elmer; Eric Orwoll; Michael Herson; Teresa Hillier
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-10-13

Review 8.  Pins and plaster aren't enough: a call for the evaluation and treatment of patients with osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; John P Bilezikian; Mishaela R Rubin; Dennis M Black; Richard S Bockman; Henry G Bone; Marc C Hochberg; Michael R McClung; Thomas J Schnitzer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  How are family physicians managing osteoporosis? Qualitative study of their experiences and educational needs.

Authors:  Susan B Jaglal; June Carroll; Gillian Hawker; Warren J McIsaac; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Suzanne M Cadarette; Cathy Cameron; Dave Davis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  A controlled trial to increase detection and treatment of osteoporosis in older patients with a wrist fracture.

Authors:  Sumit R Majumdar; Brian H Rowe; Deb Folk; Jeffrey A Johnson; Brian H Holroyd; Donald W Morrish; Walter P Maksymowych; Ivan P Steiner; Charles H Harley; Brian J Wirzba; David A Hanley; Sandra Blitz; Anthony S Russell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  70 in total

1.  Testing and treatment for osteoporosis following hip fracture in an integrated U.S. healthcare delivery system.

Authors:  A Shibli-Rahhal; M S Vaughan-Sarrazin; K Richardson; P Cram
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Quality-improvement interventions for osteoporosis: when are the results worth the effort?

Authors:  Sumit R Majumdar
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Elena Parmelli; Gaby Doumit; Melina Gattellari; Mary Ann O'Brien; Jeremy Grimshaw; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-08-10

4.  Development of an electronic medical record based intervention to improve medical care of osteoporosis.

Authors:  B J Edwards; A D Bunta; J Anderson; A Bobb; A Hahr; K J O'Leary; A Agulnek; L Andruszyn; K A Cameron; M May; N H Kazmers; N Dillon; D W Baker; M V Williams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Institutionalization following incident non-traumatic fractures in community-dwelling men and women.

Authors:  S Morin; L M Lix; M Azimaee; C Metge; S R Majumdar; W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Accident or osteoporosis?: Survey of community follow-up after low-trauma fracture.

Authors:  Sonia Singh; Ramona Foster; Karim M Khan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve quality of osteoporosis care after wrist fracture.

Authors:  S R Majumdar; D A Lier; B H Rowe; A S Russell; F A McAlister; W P Maksymowych; D A Hanley; D W Morrish; J A Johnson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: how can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job?

Authors:  Gim Gee Teng; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Critical impact of patient knowledge and bone density testing on starting osteoporosis treatment after fragility fracture: secondary analyses from two controlled trials.

Authors:  S R Majumdar; F A McAlister; J A Johnson; D L Weir; D Bellerose; D A Hanley; A S Russell; B H Rowe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures--an "OPTIMAL" model of care from Singapore.

Authors:  M Chandran; M Z W Tan; M Cheen; S B Tan; M Leong; T C Lau
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.