Literature DB >> 27635161

Study of cellular response induced by low intensity ultrasound frequency sweep pattern on myelomonocytic lymphoma U937 cells.

Mariantonietta Ivone1, Carmine Pappalettere1, Akiko Watanabe2, Katsuro Tachibana2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study will analyze the mechanical effects (immediate lysis) and biological effects (cell survival, apoptosis, cell cycle) on U937 cells subjected to different sonication conditions with increasing and decreasing frequencies and burst rate (number of burst of a repeating signal in a specific time unit), in order to determine the best conditions of sonication to produce high mortality, apoptosis and inhibition of hyperproliferation.
METHOD: Cells are been stressed by pulse wave ultrasounds with increasing and decreasing frequencies between 400 and 620 kHz, at burst rates of 0.5, 10, 50 Hz and 50 % duty cycle (percentage of one period in which a signal is active), ultrasound intensities (spatial average-temporal peak) 0.045 and 0.09 W/cm(2). The sonication durations were 90 and 180 s.
RESULTS: The decreasing mode was found to be better than the increasing mode for 10 and 50 Hz burst rates, while at 0.5 Hz the increasing mode gave better results for the time of 180 s. For 10 Hz burst rate, decreasing frequency, 180 s, 0.09 W/cm(2), 20 % survival rate was found; after 6-h incubation, cells showed 13 % of early apoptosis and 11 % of late apoptosis. For these conditions of sonication, the hyperproliferation of cells was inhibited.
CONCLUSION: Survival rate decreases for increasing intensity and duration with each burst rate. The best performance is decreasing mode in a range between 620 and 400 kHz, duty cycle 50 %, burst rate 10 Hz. In these conditions after 180 s duration, the average survival rate is 20 %, the survived cells manifest apoptosis after 6-h incubation and hyperproliferation is prevented. The results seem to lead toward a non-invasive and effective purging of leukemic cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell cycle; Cell lysis; Hyperproliferation apoptosis; Low intensity ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27635161      PMCID: PMC5005207          DOI: 10.1007/s40477-016-0199-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound        ISSN: 1876-7931


  19 in total

Review 1.  Bio-effects and safety of low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasonic exposure.

Authors:  Farzaneh Ahmadi; Ian V McLoughlin; Sunita Chauhan; Gail ter-Haar
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment.

Authors:  C K Holland; R E Apfel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Apoptosis induced by the sonomechanical effects of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in a human leukemia cell line.

Authors:  Loreto B Feril; Takashi Kondo; Zheng-Guo Cui; Yoshiaki Tabuchi; Qing-Li Zhao; Hidetaka Ando; Takuro Misaki; Hideki Yoshikawa; Shin-ichiro Umemura
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 8.679

4.  Nonthermal effects of therapeutic ultrasound: the frequency resonance hypothesis.

Authors:  Lennart D Johns
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Biophysical characterization of bladder cancer cells with different metastatic potential.

Authors:  Haijiao Liu; Qingyuan Tan; William R Geddie; Michael A S Jewett; Nigel Phillips; Danbing Ke; Craig A Simmons; Yu Sun
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.194

6.  Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects.

Authors:  Boris Krasovitski; Victor Frenkel; Shy Shoham; Eitan Kimmel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mechanical stiffness grades metastatic potential in patient tumor cells and in cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Vinay Swaminathan; Karthikeyan Mythreye; E Tim O'Brien; Andrew Berchuck; Gerard C Blobe; Richard Superfine
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Ultrasonic low-energy treatment: a novel approach to induce apoptosis in human leukemic cells.

Authors:  Laurence Lagneaux; Eric Cordemans de Meulenaer; Alain Delforge; Marielle Dejeneffe; Martine Massy; Carine Moerman; Baudouin Hannecart; Yves Canivet; Marie Françoise Lepeltier; Dominique Bron
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Influence of changing pulse repetition frequency on chemical and biological effects induced by low-intensity ultrasound in vitro.

Authors:  Mikhail A Buldakov; Mariame A Hassan; Qing-Li Zhao; Loreto B Feril; Nobuki Kudo; Takashi Kondo; Nikolai V Litvyakov; Mikhail A Bolshakov; Vladislav V Rostov; Nadejda V Cherdyntseva; Peter Riesz
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 7.491

10.  Cell stiffness is a biomarker of the metastatic potential of ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Wenwei Xu; Roman Mezencev; Byungkyu Kim; Lijuan Wang; John McDonald; Todd Sulchek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Experimental Data-Mining Analyses Reveal New Roles of Low-Intensity Ultrasound in Differentiating Cell Death Regulatome in Cancer and Non-cancer Cells via Potential Modulation of Chromatin Long-Range Interactions.

Authors:  Jiwei Wang; Bin Lai; Gayani Nanayakkara; Qian Yang; Yu Sun; Yifan Lu; Ying Shao; Daohai Yu; William Y Yang; Ramon Cueto; Hangfei Fu; Huihong Zeng; Wen Shen; Susu Wu; Chunquan Zhang; Yanna Liu; Eric T Choi; Hong Wang; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Low-frequency ultrasound-induced VEGF suppression and synergy with dendritic cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity in murine prostate cancer cells in vitro.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Wen-De Shou; Yan-Jun Xu; Wen-Kun Bai; Bing Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.