Literature DB >> 21300891

Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects.

Boris Krasovitski1, Victor Frenkel, Shy Shoham, Eitan Kimmel.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a unified model capable of explaining the mechanisms of interaction of ultrasound and biological tissue at both the diagnostic nonthermal, noncavitational (<100 mW · cm(-2)) and therapeutic, potentially cavitational (>100 mW · cm(-2)) spatial peak temporal average intensity levels. The cellular-level model (termed "bilayer sonophore") combines the physics of bubble dynamics with cell biomechanics to determine the dynamic behavior of the two lipid bilayer membrane leaflets. The existence of such a unified model could potentially pave the way to a number of controlled ultrasound-assisted applications, including CNS modulation and blood-brain barrier permeabilization. The model predicts that the cellular membrane is intrinsically capable of absorbing mechanical energy from the ultrasound field and transforming it into expansions and contractions of the intramembrane space. It further predicts that the maximum area strain is proportional to the acoustic pressure amplitude and inversely proportional to the square root of the frequency (ε A,max ∝ P(A)(0.8f - 0.5) and is intensified by proximity to free surfaces, the presence of nearby microbubbles in free medium, and the flexibility of the surrounding tissue. Model predictions were experimentally supported using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of multilayered live-cell goldfish epidermis exposed in vivo to continuous wave (CW) ultrasound at cavitational (1 MHz) and noncavitational (3 MHz) conditions. Our results support the hypothesis that ultrasonically induced bilayer membrane motion, which does not require preexistence of air voids in the tissue, may account for a variety of bioeffects and could elucidate mechanisms of ultrasound interaction with biological tissue that are currently not fully understood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21300891      PMCID: PMC3044354          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1015771108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  32 in total

1.  Ultrasound-induced cavitation damage to external epithelia of fish skin.

Authors:  V Frenkel; E Kimmel; Y Iger
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Comparative sensitivity of human and bovine erythrocytes to sonolysis by 1-MHz ultrasound.

Authors:  M W Miller; T A Sherman; A A Brayman
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Scaling the microrheology of living cells.

Authors:  B Fabry; G N Maksym; J P Butler; M Glogauer; D Navajas; J J Fredberg
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2001-09-13       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Gas-bubble lesions in stranded cetaceans.

Authors:  P D Jepson; M Arbelo; R Deaville; I A P Patterson; P Castro; J R Baker; E Degollada; H M Ross; P Herráez; A M Pocknell; F Rodríguez; F E Howie; A Espinosa; R J Reid; J R Jaber; V Martin; A A Cunningham; A Fernández
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound.

Authors:  Diane Dalecki
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.590

6.  Ultrasound-facilitated transport of silver chloride (AgCl) particles in fish skin.

Authors:  V Frenkel; E Kimmel; Y Iger
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2000-08-10       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  Water permeability and mechanical strength of polyunsaturated lipid bilayers.

Authors:  K Olbrich; W Rawicz; D Needham; E Evans
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  The search for cavitation in vivo.

Authors:  E L Carstensen; S Gracewski; D Dalecki
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Molecular dynamics simulations of hydrophilic pores in lipid bilayers.

Authors:  Hari Leontiadou; Alan E Mark; Siewert J Marrink
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Remote excitation of neuronal circuits using low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound.

Authors:  William J Tyler; Yusuf Tufail; Michael Finsterwald; Monica L Tauchmann; Emily J Olson; Cassondra Majestic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  119 in total

1.  Contrast agent-free sonoporation: The use of an ultrasonic standing wave microfluidic system for the delivery of pharmaceutical agents.

Authors:  Dario Carugo; Dyan N Ankrett; Peter Glynne-Jones; Lorenzo Capretto; Rosemary J Boltryk; Xunli Zhang; Paul A Townsend; Martyn Hill
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Real-time assessment of ultrasound-mediated drug delivery using fibered confocal fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Marc Derieppe; Anna Yudina; Matthieu Lepetit-Coiffé; Baudouin Denis de Senneville; Clemens Bos; Chrit Moonen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Tumor radiation response enhancement by acoustical stimulation of the vasculature.

Authors:  Gregory J Czarnota; Raffi Karshafian; Peter N Burns; Shun Wong; Azza Al Mahrouki; Justin W Lee; Amanda Caissie; William Tran; Christina Kim; Melissa Furukawa; Emily Wong; Anoja Giles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The role of acoustofluidics in targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Nilanjana Bose; Xunli Zhang; Tapas K Maiti; Suman Chakraborty
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Acoustofluidic sonoporation for gene delivery to human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

Authors:  Jason N Belling; Liv K Heidenreich; Zhenhua Tian; Alexandra M Mendoza; Tzu-Ting Chiou; Yao Gong; Natalie Y Chen; Thomas D Young; Natcha Wattanatorn; Jae Hyeon Park; Leonardo Scarabelli; Naihao Chiang; Jack Takahashi; Stephen G Young; Adam Z Stieg; Satiro De Oliveira; Tony Jun Huang; Paul S Weiss; Steven J Jonas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ultrasound increases nanoparticle delivery by reducing intratumoral pressure and increasing transport in epithelial and epithelial-mesenchymal transition tumors.

Authors:  Katherine D Watson; Chun-Yen Lai; Shengping Qin; Dustin E Kruse; Yueh-Chen Lin; Jai Woong Seo; Robert D Cardiff; Lisa M Mahakian; Julie Beegle; Elizabeth S Ingham; Fitz-Roy Curry; Rolf K Reed; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Enhanced homing permeability and retention of bone marrow stromal cells by noninvasive pulsed focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Ali Ziadloo; Scott R Burks; Eric M Gold; Bobbi K Lewis; Aneeka Chaudhry; Maria J Merino; Victor Frenkel; Joseph A Frank
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.277

8.  Pulsed focused ultrasound treatment of muscle mitigates paralysis-induced bone loss in the adjacent bone: a study in a mouse model.

Authors:  Sandra L Poliachik; Tatiana D Khokhlova; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 9.  Nanoplatforms for Targeted Stimuli-Responsive Drug Delivery: A Review of Platform Materials and Stimuli-Responsive Release and Targeting Mechanisms.

Authors:  Yuzhe Sun; Edward Davis
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 5.076

10.  Thermodynamics of interleaflet cavitation in lipid bilayer membranes.

Authors:  Shay M Rappaport; Alexander M Berezhkovskii; Joshua Zimmerberg; Sergey M Bezrukov
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2013-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.