Literature DB >> 19022698

Influence of changing pulse repetition frequency on chemical and biological effects induced by low-intensity ultrasound in vitro.

Mikhail A Buldakov1, Mariame A Hassan, Qing-Li Zhao, Loreto B Feril, Nobuki Kudo, Takashi Kondo, Nikolai V Litvyakov, Mikhail A Bolshakov, Vladislav V Rostov, Nadejda V Cherdyntseva, Peter Riesz.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to examine ultrasound (US) mechanisms and their impact on chemical and biological effects in vitro as a function of changing pulse repetition frequency (PRF) from 0.5 to 100Hz using a 1MHz-generator at low-intensities and 50% duty factor (DF). The presence of inertial cavitation was detected by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spin-trapping of hydroxyl radicals resulting from sonolysis of water. Non-cavitational effects were evaluated by studying the extent of sucrose hydrolysis measured by UV spectrophotometry. Biological effects were assessed by measuring the extent of cell killing and apoptosis induction in U937 cells using Trypan blue dye exclusion test and flow cytometry, respectively. The results indicate significant PRF dependence with respect to hydroxyl radical formation, cell killing and apoptosis induction. The lowest free radical formation and cell killing and the highest cell viability were found at 5Hz (100ms pulse duration). On the other hand, no correlation was found between sucrose hydrolysis and PRF. To our knowledge, this is the first report to be devoted to study the impact of low PRFs at low-intensities on US-induced chemical and biological effects and the mechanisms involved. This study has introduced the role of "US streaming" (convection); a forgotten factor in optimization studies, and explored its importance in comparison to standing waves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19022698     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2008.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem        ISSN: 1350-4177            Impact factor:   7.491


  7 in total

1.  Differential cytotoxicity and sonosensitization by sanazole: effect of cell type and acoustic parameters.

Authors:  Mariame A Hassan; Yukihiro Furusawa; Qing-Li Zhao; Ichiro Takasaki; Loreto B Feril; Katsuro Tachibana; Nobuki Kudo; Masami Minemura; Toshiro Sugiyama; Takashi Kondo
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Ultrasonic bioreactor as a platform for studying cellular response.

Authors:  Anuradha Subramanian; Joseph A Turner; Gaurav Budhiraja; Sanjukta Guha Thakurta; Nicholas P Whitney; Sai Siddhartha Nudurupati
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.056

3.  Study of cellular response induced by low intensity ultrasound frequency sweep pattern on myelomonocytic lymphoma U937 cells.

Authors:  Mariantonietta Ivone; Carmine Pappalettere; Akiko Watanabe; Katsuro Tachibana
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2016-04-04

4.  Effect of ultrasonic irradiation on bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Harumi Koibuchi; Yasutomo Fujii; Yoshikazu Hirai; Takashi Mochizuki; Kohji Masuda; Kazuhiko Kotani; Toshiyuki Yamada; Nobuyuki Taniguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Calcium overload and in vitro apoptosis of the C6 glioma cells mediated by sonodynamic therapy (hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether and ultrasound).

Authors:  Dongning Hao; Yanbin Song; Zhen Che; Qi Liu
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.194

6.  Janus 3D printed dynamic scaffolds for nanovibration-driven bone regeneration.

Authors:  Sandra Camarero-Espinosa; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  In vitro stimulation of calcium overload and apoptosis by sonodynamic therapy combined with hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether in C6 glioma cells.

Authors:  Shaochun Dai; Changqing Xu; Ye Tian; Wen Cheng; Bo Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.967

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.