Literature DB >> 22402278

Bio-effects and safety of low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasonic exposure.

Farzaneh Ahmadi1, Ian V McLoughlin, Sunita Chauhan, Gail ter-Haar.   

Abstract

Low-frequency (LF) ultrasound (20-100 kHz) has a diverse set of industrial and medical applications. In fact, high power industrial applications of ultrasound mainly occupy this frequency range. This range is also used for various therapeutic medical applications including sonophoresis (ultrasonic transdermal drug delivery), dentistry, eye surgery, body contouring, the breaking of kidney stones and eliminating blood clots. While emerging LF applications such as ultrasonic drug delivery continue to be developed and undergo translation for human use, significant gaps exist in the coverage of safety standards for this frequency range. Accordingly, the need to understand the biological effects of LF ultrasound is becoming more important. This paper presents a broad overview of bio-effects and safety of LF ultrasound as an aid to minimize and control the risk of these effects. Its particular focus is at low intensities where bio-effects are initially observed. To generate a clear perspective of hazards in LF exposure, the mechanisms of bio-effects and the main differences in action at low and high frequencies are investigated and a survey of harmful effects of LF ultrasound at low intensities is presented. Mechanical and thermal indices are widely used in high frequency diagnostic applications as a means of indicating safety of ultrasonic exposure. The direct application of these indices at low frequencies needs careful investigation. In this work, using numerical simulations based on the mathematical and physical rationale behind the indices at high frequencies, it is observed that while thermal index (TI) can be used directly in the LF range, mechanical index (MI) seems to become less reliable at lower frequencies. Accordingly, an improved formulation for the MI is proposed for frequencies below 500 kHz.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22402278     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2012.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  32 in total

1.  Thermal safety of ultrasound-enhanced ocular drug delivery: A modeling study.

Authors:  Marjan Nabili; Craig Geist; Vesna Zderic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Optimization of low-frequency low-intensity ultrasound-mediated microvessel disruption on prostate cancer xenografts in nude mice using an orthogonal experimental design.

Authors:  Y U Yang; Wenkun Bai; Yini Chen; Yanduan Lin; Bing Hu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Sonocrystallization of conjugated polymers with ultrasound fields.

Authors:  Yuyin Xi; David S Li; Greg M Newbloom; Wesley K Tatum; Matthew O'Donnell; Christine K Luscombe; Lilo D Pozzo
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.679

4.  Study of cellular response induced by low intensity ultrasound frequency sweep pattern on myelomonocytic lymphoma U937 cells.

Authors:  Mariantonietta Ivone; Carmine Pappalettere; Akiko Watanabe; Katsuro Tachibana
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2016-04-04

5.  Bifunctional Therapeutic Application of Low-Frequency Ultrasound Associated with Zinc Phthalocyanine-Loaded Micelles.

Authors:  Yugo A Martins; Maria J V Fonseca; Theo Z Pavan; Renata F V Lopez
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-10-20

Review 6.  Ultrasound-induced biophysical effects in controlled drug delivery.

Authors:  Lulu Zhang; Zhuohua Lin; Lan Zeng; Fan Zhang; Lihong Sun; Suhui Sun; Ping Wang; Menghong Xu; Jinxia Zhang; Xiaolong Liang; Huiyu Ge
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 6.038

Review 7.  How physical techniques improve the transdermal permeation of therapeutics: A review.

Authors:  Yan Gao; Lina Du; Qian Li; Qi Li; Lin Zhu; Meiyan Yang; Xiu Wang; Bonian Zhao; Shan Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  The effects of percutaneous ethanol injection followed by 20-kHz ultrasound and microbubbles on rabbit hepatic tumors.

Authors:  Zhi Yong Shen; Gan Lin Xia; Ming Feng Wu; Lei Yan Ji; Yong Jun Li
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  High-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound and microbubbles enhance nerve blockade.

Authors:  Kathleen Cullion; Claudia M Santamaria; Changyou Zhan; David Zurakowski; Tao Sun; Grant L Pemberton; Nathan J McDannold; Daniel S Kohane
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 10.  Ultrasound-Responsive Nanocarriers in Cancer Treatment: A Review.

Authors:  Nahid S Awad; Vinod Paul; Nour M AlSawaftah; Gail Ter Haar; Theresa M Allen; William G Pitt; Ghaleb A Husseini
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2021-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.