Literature DB >> 27634533

Bats perceptually weight prey cues across sensory systems when hunting in noise.

D G E Gomes1, R A Page2, I Geipel2, R C Taylor3, M J Ryan4, W Halfwerk5.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise can interfere with environmental information processing and thereby reduce survival and reproduction. Receivers of signals and cues in particular depend on perceptual strategies to adjust to noisy conditions. We found that predators that hunt using prey sounds can reduce the negative impact of noise by making use of prey cues conveyed through additional sensory systems. In the presence of masking noise, but not in its absence, frog-eating bats preferred and were faster in attacking a robotic frog emitting multiple sensory cues. The behavioral changes induced by masking noise were accompanied by an increase in active localization through echolocation. Our findings help to reveal how animals can adapt to anthropogenic noise and have implications for the role of sensory ecology in driving species interactions.
Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27634533     DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf7934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  15 in total

1.  Anthropogenic noise impairs foraging for cryptic prey via cross-sensory interference.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Kees van Oers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Light and noise pollution interact to disrupt interspecific interactions.

Authors:  Taegan A McMahon; Jason R Rohr; Ximena E Bernal
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 3.  Neural circuit control of innate behaviors.

Authors:  Wei Xiao; Zhuo-Lei Jiao; Esra Senol; Jiwei Yao; Miao Zhao; Zheng-Dong Zhao; Xiaowei Chen; Peng Cao; Yu Fu; Zhihua Gao; Wei L Shen; Xiao-Hong Xu
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 6.038

4.  Cross-modal facilitation of auditory discrimination in a frog.

Authors:  Logan S James; A Leonie Baier; Rachel A Page; Paul Clements; Kimberly L Hunter; Ryan C Taylor; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.812

5.  Mid-flight prey switching in the fringed-lipped bat (Trachops cirrhosus).

Authors:  Ciara E Kernan; A N Yiambilis; Z E Searcy; R M Pulica; R A Page; M S Caldwell
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2022-08-15

6.  Heterospecific eavesdropping on disturbance cues of a treefrog.

Authors:  Qiao-Ling He; Ke Deng; Xiao-Ping Wang; Qing-Hua Chen; Tong-Liang Wang; Ji-Chao Wang; Jian-Guo Cui
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 2.899

7.  Selecting auditory alerting stimuli for eagles on the basis of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Benjamin Goller; Patrice Baumhardt; Ernesto Dominguez-Villegas; Todd Katzner; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 8.  Efficient information coding and degeneracy in the nervous system.

Authors:  Pavithraa Seenivasan; Rishikesh Narayanan
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 7.070

9.  Inconspicuous echolocation in hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereus).

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Theodore J Weller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche.

Authors:  D G E Gomes; C A Toth; H J Cole; C D Francis; J R Barber
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.