Literature DB >> 28170099

Light and noise pollution interact to disrupt interspecific interactions.

Taegan A McMahon1, Jason R Rohr2, Ximena E Bernal3,4.   

Abstract

Studies on the consequences of urbanization often examine the effects of light, noise, and heat pollution independently on isolated species providing a limited understanding of how these combined stressors affect species interactions. Here, we investigate how these factors interact to affect parasitic frog-biting midges (Corethrella spp.) and their túngara frog (Engystomops pustulosus) hosts. A survey of túngara frog calling sites revealed that frog abundance was not significantly correlated with urbanization, light, noise, or temperature. In contrast, frog-biting midges were sensitive to light pollution and noise pollution. Increased light intensity significantly reduced midge abundance at low noise levels. At high noise intensity, there were no midges regardless of light level. Two field experiments controlling light and noise levels to examine attraction of the midges to their host and their feeding behavior confirmed the causality of these field patterns. These findings demonstrate that both light and noise pollution disrupt this host-parasite interaction and highlight the importance of considering interactions among species and types of pollutants to accurately assess the impacts of urbanization on ecological communities.
© 2017 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Corethrellazzm321990; zzm321990Physalaemus pustulosuszzm321990; Túngara frogs; anthropogenic pollution; eavesdropper; ectoparasite; urbanization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28170099      PMCID: PMC7183140          DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  26 in total

1.  Ecology: Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Margriet Peet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Niels Bouton; Ilse van Opzeeland; Aukje Coers; Carel ten Cate; Arthur N Popper
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Light pollution as a biodiversity threat.

Authors:  Franz Hölker; Christian Wolter; Elizabeth K Perkin; Klement Tockner
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere.

Authors:  Erle C Ellis
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2011-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Global change and the ecology of cities.

Authors:  Nancy B Grimm; Stanley H Faeth; Nancy E Golubiewski; Charles L Redman; Jianguo Wu; Xuemei Bai; John M Briggs
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Bat predation and the evolution of frog vocalizations in the neotropics.

Authors:  M D Tuttle; M J Ryan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Pollution going multimodal: the complex impact of the human-altered sensory environment on animal perception and performance.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Cues used in host-seeking behavior by frog-biting midges (Corethrella spp. Coquillet).

Authors:  Ximena E Bernal; Priyanka de Silva
Journal:  J Vector Ecol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  The influence of host defensive behavior on mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) biting persistence.

Authors:  E D Walker; J D Edman
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1985-07-26       Impact factor: 2.278

10.  Sexual differences in prevalence of a new species of trypanosome infecting túngara frogs.

Authors:  Ximena E Bernal; C Miguel Pinto
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.674

View more
  14 in total

1.  A New Framework for Urban Ecology: An Integration of Proximate and Ultimate Responses to Anthropogenic Change.

Authors:  Jenny Q Ouyang; Caroline Isaksson; Chloé Schmidt; Pierce Hutton; Frances Bonier; Davide Dominoni
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

2.  A meta-analysis of biological impacts of artificial light at night.

Authors:  Dirk Sanders; Enric Frago; Rachel Kehoe; Christophe Patterson; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 3.  Exposure to Artificial Light at Night and the Consequences for Flora, Fauna, and Ecosystems.

Authors:  Jack Falcón; Alicia Torriglia; Dina Attia; Françoise Viénot; Claude Gronfier; Francine Behar-Cohen; Christophe Martinsons; David Hicks
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Artificial light at night as an environmental pollutant: An integrative approach across taxa, biological functions, and scientific disciplines.

Authors:  Davide M Dominoni; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2018-10

5.  Long-term noise pollution affects seedling recruitment and community composition, with negative effects persisting after removal.

Authors:  Jennifer N Phillips; Sarah E Termondt; Clinton D Francis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Ambient anthropogenic noise but not light is associated with the ecophysiology of free-living songbird nestlings.

Authors:  Thomas Raap; Rianne Pinxten; Giulia Casasole; Nina Dehnhard; Marcel Eens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Testing the AC/DC hypothesis: Rock and roll is noise pollution and weakens a trophic cascade.

Authors:  Brandon T Barton; Mariah E Hodge; Cori J Speights; Anna M Autrey; Marcus A Lashley; Vincent P Klink
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 8.  How ecological communities respond to artificial light at night.

Authors:  Dirk Sanders; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2018-04-14

Review 9.  The impact of artificial light at night on nocturnal insects: A review and synthesis.

Authors:  Avalon C S Owens; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.167

10.  Background noise disrupts host-parasitoid interactions.

Authors:  Jennifer N Phillips; Sophia K Ruef; Christopher M Garvin; My-Lan T Le; Clinton D Francis
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.