Literature DB >> 32259473

Anthropogenic noise impairs foraging for cryptic prey via cross-sensory interference.

Wouter Halfwerk1, Kees van Oers2.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise levels are globally rising with profound impacts on ecosystems and the species that live in them. Masking or distraction by noise can interfere with relevant sounds and thereby impact ecological interactions between individuals of the same or different species. Predator-prey dynamics are particularly likely to be influenced by rising noise levels, with important population- and community-level consequences, as species may differentially adapt to noise disturbance. Acoustic noise can, however, also impair the use of visual information by animals through the process of cross-sensory interference, possibly impacting species interactions that have so far been largely ignored by noise impact studies. Here, we assessed how noise affected the performance of great tit (Parus major) foraging on cryptic prey. Birds trained individually to search for paper moths differing in the level of camouflage with the test background were tested in the presence and absence of noise. We found that noise significantly increased approach and attack latencies, but that the effect depended on the level of crypsis. Noise increased latencies for cryptic prey targets, but not for conspicuous and colour-matched prey targets. Our results show that noise can interfere with the processing of visual information, particularly in difficult tasks such as separating objects from a similar looking background. These results have important ecological and evolutionary implications as they demonstrate how globally rising anthropogenic noise levels can influence the arms race between predators and prey across sensory domains.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anthropogenic noise; cross-sensory interference; cryptic prey; species interactions; visual predator

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32259473      PMCID: PMC7209062          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  28 in total

1.  Traffic noise affects embryo mortality and nestling growth rates in captive zebra finches.

Authors:  Dominique A Potvin; Scott A MacDougall-Shackleton
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol       Date:  2015-09-09

Review 2.  Pollution going multimodal: the complex impact of the human-altered sensory environment on animal perception and performance.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Adaptive changes in sexual signalling in response to urbanization.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Michiel Blaas; Lars Kramer; Nadia Hijner; Paula A Trillo; Ximena E Bernal; Rachel A Page; Sandra Goutte; Michael J Ryan; Jacintha Ellers
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Effects of experimentally elevated traffic noise on nestling white-crowned sparrow stress physiology, immune function and life history.

Authors:  Ondi L Crino; Erin E Johnson; Jessica L Blickley; Gail L Patricelli; Creagh W Breuner
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Frogs adapt to physiologically costly anthropogenic noise.

Authors:  Jennifer B Tennessen; Susan E Parks; Lindsey Swierk; Laura K Reinert; Whitney M Holden; Louise A Rollins-Smith; Koranda A Walsh; Tracy Langkilde
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Cross-modal impacts of anthropogenic noise on information use.

Authors:  Amy Morris-Drake; Julie M Kern; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Realized heritability of personalities in the great tit (Parus major).

Authors:  Pieter J Drent; Kees van Oers; Arie J van Noordwijk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Anthropogenic noise compromises antipredator behaviour in European eels.

Authors:  Stephen D Simpson; Julia Purser; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 10.863

9.  Hunting at the highway: traffic noise reduces foraging efficiency in acoustic predators.

Authors:  Björn M Siemers; Andrea Schaub
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Experimental chronic noise is related to elevated fecal corticosteroid metabolites in lekking male greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus).

Authors:  Jessica L Blickley; Karen R Word; Alan H Krakauer; Jennifer L Phillips; Sarah N Sells; Conor C Taff; John C Wingfield; Gail L Patricelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Anthropogenic noise impairs foraging for cryptic prey via cross-sensory interference.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Kees van Oers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Noise distracts foraging bats.

Authors:  Louise C Allen; Nickolay I Hristov; Juliette J Rubin; Joseph T Lightsey; Jesse R Barber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  A comprehensive overview of the effects of urbanisation on sexual selection and sexual traits.

Authors:  Andrew D Cronin; Judith A H Smit; Matías I Muñoz; Armand Poirier; Peter A Moran; Paul Jerem; Wouter Halfwerk
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-03-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.