Literature DB >> 36131103

Heterospecific eavesdropping on disturbance cues of a treefrog.

Qiao-Ling He1,2, Ke Deng3, Xiao-Ping Wang1,2, Qing-Hua Chen4, Tong-Liang Wang5, Ji-Chao Wang5, Jian-Guo Cui6.   

Abstract

Alarm signals and cues are crucial to animal survival and vary greatly across species. Eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm signals and cues can provide eavesdroppers with information about potential threats. In addition to acoustic alarm signals, evidence has accumulated that chemical alarm cues and disturbance cues can also play a role in alerting conspecifics to potential danger in adult anurans (frogs and toads). However, there is very little known about whether disturbance cues are exploited by heterospecifics. In the present study, we conducted a binary choice experiment and a prey chemical discrimination experiment, respectively, to test the responses of a sympatric anuran species (red webbed treefrogs, Rhacophorus rhodopus) and a sympatric predator species (Chinese green tree vipers, Trimeresurus stejnegeri) to disturbance odors emitted by serrate-legged small treefrogs (Kurixalus odontotarsus). In the binary choice experiment, we found that the presence of disturbance odors did not significantly trigger the avoidance behavior of R. rhodopus. In the prey chemical discrimination experiment, compared with odors from undisturbed K. odontotarsus (control odors) and odorless control, T. stejnegeri showed a significantly higher tongue-flick rate in response to disturbance odors. This result implies that disturbance odor cues of K. odontotarsus can be exploited by eavesdropping predators to detect prey. Our study provides partial evidence for heterospecific eavesdropping on disturbance cues and has an important implication for understanding heterospecific eavesdropping on chemical cues of adult anurans.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical communication; Disturbance odors; Frogs; Snake; Tongue-flick rate

Year:  2022        PMID: 36131103     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01690-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   2.899


  22 in total

1.  Foraging mode and evolution of strike-induced chemosensory searching in lizards.

Authors:  William E Cooper
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Bats perceptually weight prey cues across sensory systems when hunting in noise.

Authors:  D G E Gomes; R A Page; I Geipel; R C Taylor; M J Ryan; W Halfwerk
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Chemical-cue preferences of inexperienced snakes: comparative aspects.

Authors:  G M Burghardt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Avoidance response of juvenile Pacific treefrogs to chemical cues of introduced predatory bullfrogs.

Authors:  D P Chivers; E L Wildy; J M Kiesecker; A R Blaustein
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  A larval aggregation pheromone as foraging cue for insectivorous birds.

Authors:  Pablo Díaz-Siefer; Jaime Tapia-Gatica; Jaime Martínez-Harms; Jan Bergmann; Juan L Celis-Diez
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.812

6.  Frog volatile compounds: application of in vivo SPME for the characterization of the odorous secretions from two species of Hypsiboas treefrogs.

Authors:  Andrés E Brunetti; Josias Merib; Eduardo Carasek; Elina B Caramão; Janaina Barbará; Claudia A Zini; Julián Faivovich
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Timber rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus) use chemical cues to select ambush sites.

Authors:  Rulon W Clark
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  A comparative analysis of scoring methods for chemical discrimination of prey by squamate reptiles.

Authors:  W E Cooper; G M Burghardt
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Conspecific odor cues induce different vocal responses in serrate-legged small treefrogs, but only in the absence of acoustic signals.

Authors:  Ke Deng; Ya Zhou; Qiao-Ling He; Bi-Cheng Zhu; Tong-Liang Wang; Ji-Chao Wang; Jian-Guo Cui
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.