Literature DB >> 29181555

Predicting vection and visually induced motion sickness based on spontaneous postural activity.

Stephen Palmisano1,2, Benjamin Arcioni3, Paul J Stapley4,5.   

Abstract

Evidence is mounting that differences in postural instability can be used to predict who will experience strong illusory self-motions (vection) and become sick when exposed to global patterns of optical flow (e.g., Apthorp et al., PLoS One 9(12):e113897, 2014; Stoffregen and Smart, Brain Res Bull 47:437-448, 1998). This study compared the predictive ability of traditional and recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) based measures of postural activity. We initially measured spontaneous fluctuations in the centre of foot pressure (CoP) of our subjects as they stood quietly with their eyes open and closed. They were then repeatedly exposed to two different types of self-motion display. As expected, the oscillating self-motion displays were found to induce stronger vection and greater sickness than the smooth self-motion displays. RQA based measures of spontaneous postural activity proved to be superior predictors of both vection strength and visually induced motion sickness (VIMS). Participants who had displayed lower CoP recurrence rates when standing quietly were more likely to later report stronger vection and VIMS when exposed to both types of optical flow. Vection strength (but not VIMS) was also found to correlate significantly with three other RQA based measures of postural activity (determinism, entropy, and average diagonal line length). We propose that these RQA based measures of spontaneous postural activity could serve as useful diagnostic tools for evaluating who will benefit the most/least from exposure to virtual environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Moton sickness; Optic flow; Postural sway; Self-motion; Vection; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29181555     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5130-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  62 in total

1.  Recurrence quantification analysis of postural fluctuations.

Authors:  M A Riley; R Balasubramaniam; M T Turvey
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Postural instability precedes motion sickness.

Authors:  T A Stoffregen; L J Smart
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Motion sickness susceptibility associated with visually induced postural instability and cardiac autonomic responses in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Yoichi Yokota; Mitsuhiro Aoki; Keisuke Mizuta; Yatsuji Ito; Naoki Isu
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  Eye movement, vection, and motion sickness with foveal and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Nicholas A Webb; Michael J Griffin
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2003-06

5.  Body load and the postural precursors of motion sickness.

Authors:  Frank C Koslucher; Eric J Haaland; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Simulated angular head oscillation enhances vection in depth.

Authors:  Juno Kim; Stephen Palmisano; Frederick Bonato
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Effects of gaze on vection from jittering, oscillating, and purely radial optic flow.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Juno Kim
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Sex differences in visual performance and postural sway precede sex differences in visually induced motion sickness.

Authors:  Frank Koslucher; Eric Haaland; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Isolating the effects of vection and optokinetic nystagmus on optokinetic rotation-induced motion sickness.

Authors:  Jennifer T T Ji; Richard H Y So; Raymond T F Cheung
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.888

10.  The role of vection, eye movements and postural instability in the etiology of motion sickness.

Authors:  Moira B Flanagan; James G May; Thomas G Dobie
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.435

View more
  6 in total

1.  Larger Head Displacement to Optic Flow Presented in the Lower Visual Field.

Authors:  Kanon Fujimoto; Hiroshi Ashida
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-11-22

2.  Idiosyncratic multisensory reweighting as the common cause for motion sickness susceptibility and adaptation to postural perturbation.

Authors:  Merrick Dida; Corinne Cian; Pierre-Alain Barraud; Michel Guerraz; Rafael Laboissière
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Detection of unrecognized spatial disorientation: A theoretical perspective.

Authors:  Chenru Hao; Li Cheng; Lisha Guo; Ruibin Zhao; Yanru Wu; Xiuyuan Li; Ziqiang Chi; Jingjing Zhang; Xu Liu; Xiaohan Ma; Anqi Wang; Chunnan Dong; Jing Li
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 1.205

4.  A digital intervention using virtual reality helmets to reduce dental anxiety of children under local anesthesia and primary teeth extraction: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Qin Du; Xinru Ma; Shasha Wang; Shiyu Zhou; Chunmei Luo; Kun Tian; Wei Fei; Xianghong Liu
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Effects of stereopsis on vection, presence and cybersickness in head-mounted display (HMD) virtual reality.

Authors:  Wilson Luu; Barbara Zangerl; Michael Kalloniatis; Juno Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Estimating the sensorimotor components of cybersickness.

Authors:  Séamas Weech; Jessy Parokaran Varghese; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.714

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.