Literature DB >> 27627708

Evolution of Design of Interbody Cages for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Kevin Phan1,2,3, Ralph J Mobbs4,5,6.   

Abstract

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is one of the surgical procedures for the relief of chronic back pain, radiculopathy and neurogenic claudication in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease that is refractory to conservative therapy, low-grade spondylolisthesis and pseudo arthrosis. Over the past half century, both the surgical techniques and instrumentation required for ALIF have changed significantly. In particular, the designs of ALIF cage and the materials used have evolved dramatically, the common goal being to improve fusion rates and optimize clinical outcomes. The increasing popularity of ALIF is reflected by the increasing abundance of published studies reporting clinical outcomes, surgical techniques and grafting options for ALIF. Developments in cage designs include cylindrical Bagby and Kuslich, cylindrical ray, cylindrical mesh, lumbar-tapered, polyethyl-etherketone cage and integral fixation cages. Biologic implants include bone dowels and femoral ring allografts. Methods for optimization of cage design have included cage dimensions, use of novel composite cage materials and integral fixation technologies. However, the historical development and evolution of cages used for ALIF has not been extensively documented. This article therefore aims to provide an overview of the historical basis for the anterior approach, evolution in design of ALIF cage implants and potential future research directions.
© 2016 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALIF; Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Cage; Design; Review of published reports

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27627708      PMCID: PMC6584298          DOI: 10.1111/os.12259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1757-7853            Impact factor:   2.071


  102 in total

1.  Effect of implant design and endplate preparation on the compressive strength of interbody fusion constructs.

Authors:  T Steffen; A Tsantrizos; M Aebi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Bonding of alkali- and heat-treated tantalum implants to bone.

Authors:  H Kato; T Nakamura; S Nishiguchi; Y Matsusue; M Kobayashi; T Miyazaki; H M Kim; T Kokubo
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000

Review 3.  Symposium: a critical discrepancy-a criteria of successful arthrodesis following interbody spinal fusions.

Authors:  P C McAfee; S D Boden; J W Brantigan; R D Fraser; S D Kuslich; T R Oxland; M M Panjabi; C D Ray; T A Zdeblick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Biomechanics of grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Part 2: treatment with threaded interbody cages/dowels and pedicle screws.

Authors:  S Cagli; N R Crawford; V K Sonntag; C A Dickman
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Rationale for interbody fusion with threaded titanium cages at cervical and lumbar levels. Results on 357 cases.

Authors:  G Matgé; T A Leclercq
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 6.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  P J Burke
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  2001 May-Jun

7.  Posterior reduction and anterior lumbar interbody fusion in symptomatic low-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: short-term radiological and functional outcome.

Authors:  M Spruit; P W Pavlov; J Leitao; M De Kleuver; P G Anderson; F Den Boer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The use of allograft (and avoidance of autograft) in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a critical analysis.

Authors:  A M Sarwat; J P O'Brien; P Renton; J C Sutcliffe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The effect of cage stiffness on the rate of lumbar interbody fusion: an in vivo model using poly(l-lactic Acid) and titanium cages.

Authors:  Martijn van Dijk; Theo H Smit; S Sugihara; Elisabeth H Burger; Paul I Wuisman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices.

Authors:  M Kanayama; B W Cunningham; C J Haggerty; K Abumi; K Kaneda; P C McAfee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  12 in total

1.  Editorial on "Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone oblique cages with and without a titanium coating: a randomised clinical pilot study".

Authors:  Kristian Høy; Haisheng Li
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

2.  Critical Evaluation of Biomechanical Principles and Radiographic Indicators for Fusion Assessment in a Novel Conformable Porous Mesh Implant.

Authors:  Lisa Ferrara; William Ford; Pierce D Nunley; Barbara D Boyan; Marcus B Stone
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

Review 3.  Regenerative Medicine Strategies in Biomedical Implants.

Authors:  Divya Rani Bijukumar; Clay McGeehan; Mathew T Mathew
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Clinical outcomes for lumbar fusion using silicon nitride versus other biomaterials.

Authors:  Graham C Calvert; George VanBuren Huffmon; William M Rambo; Micah W Smith; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-03

5.  A UK-based pilot study of current surgical practice and implant preferences in lumbar fusion surgery.

Authors:  Elena Provaggi; Claudio Capelli; Julian J H Leong; Deepak M Kalaskar
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Clinical outcomes for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with silicon nitride spine cages: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Graham C Calvert; George VanBuren Huffmon; William M Rambo; Micah W Smith; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

7.  [Comparison of the effectiveness of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of Cage dislodgement after lumbar surgery].

Authors:  Guangduo Zhu; Yingjie Hao; Lei Yu; Cheng Peng; Jian Zhu; Panke Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15

8.  Two-year results of a double-blind multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) versus silicon nitride spinal fusion cages in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders.

Authors:  Bryan J McEntire; Greg Maslin; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-09

9.  Comparing the efficacy of syngeneic iliac and femoral allografts with iliac crest autograft in a rat model of lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Christina Holmes; Benjamin D Elder; Wataru Ishida; Alexander Perdomo-Pantoja; John Locke; Ethan Cottrill; Sheng-Fu L Lo; Timothy F Witham
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Risk Factors Associated With Femoral Ring Allograft Breakage in ALIF.

Authors:  Travis Philipp; Stephanie S Radoslovich; Jung U Yoo
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-11-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.