Literature DB >> 10883340

Rationale for interbody fusion with threaded titanium cages at cervical and lumbar levels. Results on 357 cases.

G Matgé1, T A Leclercq.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 357 cases of degenerative disc disease treated by interbody fusion with threaded titanium cages.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficiency of cervical and lumbar interbody fusions using threaded titanium cages and autogenous bone. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Stabilizing the anterior column by interbody fusion, though reported over 50 years ago, is less commonly done than posterior fusions. The recent development of rigid cages housing autogenous bone simplifies the technique of interbody fusion. This report shows our combined results using this technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-five patients had cervical fusions at 175 levels between C3 and C7. Two hundred twenty-two patients had lumbar fusion at 243 levels between L2 and S1. All surgeries involved one or two disc spaces except for one three level cervical fusion. We implanted all disc spaces with threaded cages containing autogenous bone.
RESULTS: In the cervical area, 95% of the radiculopathic patients had a good to excellent result, but only 50% of the myelopathic patients did so. At lumbar level, 80% of the patients were classified as good to excellent, 15% improved but remained disabled, 5% had minimal or no improvement. The cervical fusion rate was 90% at 6 months and 100% at one year. Lumbar fusion rate was 91% at one year and 96% at 2 years. No late breakage or cage displacement occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Cervical and lumbar interbody fusions with threaded titanium cages appear to be efficacious with few complications. Long term follow-up (4 years cervical, 7 years lumbar) confirms that impression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10883340     DOI: 10.1007/s007010050453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  15 in total

1.  [Experiences with six different intervertebral disc spacers for spondylodesis of the cervical spine].

Authors:  U Meier; D Kemmesies
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Interbody metal implants ("cages") for lumbar fusion].

Authors:  G Freiherr von Salis-Soglio; R Scholz; K Seller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Anterior cervical spinal fusion with the Intromed ZWE System: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Johannes Schröder; Florian Grosse-Dresselhaus; Christoph Schul; Hansdetlef Wassmann
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Long-term randomised comparison between a carbon fibre cage and the Cloward procedure in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson; Ludek Vavruch; Rune Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  ACDF Using the Solis Cage with Iliac Bone Graft in Single Level: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Average 36 months Follow-up.

Authors:  Si-Hyuck Oh; Kyeong-Wook Yoon; Young-Jin Kim; Sang-Koo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2013-06-30

6.  Evolution of Design of Interbody Cages for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

7.  Investigation of clinically important benefit of anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Subsidence of Cylindrical Cage (AMSLUtrade mark Cage) : Postoperative 1 Year Follow-up of the Cervical Anterior Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Young Il Joung; Seong Hoon Oh; Yong Ko; Hyeong Joong Yi; Seung Ku Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2007-11-20

9.  Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning.

Authors:  Erol Gercek; Vincent Arlet; Josee Delisle; Dante Marchesi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Spacers for Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Johannes Lemcke; Ferass Al-Zain; Ullrich Meier; Olaf Suess
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.