Graham C Calvert1, George VanBuren Huffmon2, William M Rambo3, Micah W Smith4, Bryan J McEntire5, B Sonny Bal5. 1. Mississippi Sports Medicine & Orthopedic Center, Jackson, MS, USA. 2. Atlantic Neurosurgical and Spine Specialists, Wilmington, NC, USA. 3. Midlands Orthopedic & Neurosurgery, Columbia, SC, USA. 4. Ortho Northeast, Fort Wayne, IN, USA. 5. SINTX Technologies, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In lumbar fusion surgery, intervertebral spacer cages made of silicon nitride (Si3N4) ceramic are an available option among other biomaterials. While the surface chemistry of Si3N4 is known to favor bone fusion, large-scale clinical studies attesting to its efficacy are lacking. This multicenter retrospective study compared lumbar fusion outcomes for Si3N4 cages to previously reported data for other cage materials. METHODS: Pre-operative patient demographics, comorbidities, changes in visual analog scale (ΔVAS) pain scores, complications, adverse events, and secondary surgical interventions (SSI) were compiled from the records of 450 patients who underwent Si3N4 lumbar spinal fusion at four separate U.S. surgical centers. For comparison, MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar searches identified studies reporting similar outcomes for other biomaterials. A total of 1,025 patients from 26 cohorts reported in 14 publications met inclusion criteria for this control group. RESULTS: Overall, the mean last-follow-up for all patients was 341±293 days (11.4±9.8 months), with the longest follow-up being 6.4 years. Patients with Si3N4 implants were similar in gender and age distribution to the control group but had higher BMI values (30.9±6.1 vs. 25.8±4.1, P<0.01) and lower tobacco use (15.8% vs. 30.0%, P<0.01). Both the Si3N4 and control groups showed significant improvements in VAS pain scores from preoperative to last follow-up. For the Si3N4 group, ΔVAS was 36.8±35.4 points compared to 37.6±22.5 points (P=0.63) for the metadata group. Complications and reoperations for the Si3N4 and the control groups were similar (i.e., 9.8% and 3.1% versus 12.4% and 2.9%, P=0.16 and P=0.84, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar fusion with Si3N4 spacers compared favorably with the improvements reported with other commonly used biomaterial cages. 2020 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: In lumbar fusion surgery, intervertebral spacer cages made of silicon nitride (Si3N4) ceramic are an available option among other biomaterials. While the surface chemistry of Si3N4 is known to favor bone fusion, large-scale clinical studies attesting to its efficacy are lacking. This multicenter retrospective study compared lumbar fusion outcomes for Si3N4 cages to previously reported data for other cage materials. METHODS: Pre-operative patient demographics, comorbidities, changes in visual analog scale (ΔVAS) pain scores, complications, adverse events, and secondary surgical interventions (SSI) were compiled from the records of 450 patients who underwent Si3N4 lumbar spinal fusion at four separate U.S. surgical centers. For comparison, MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar searches identified studies reporting similar outcomes for other biomaterials. A total of 1,025 patients from 26 cohorts reported in 14 publications met inclusion criteria for this control group. RESULTS: Overall, the mean last-follow-up for all patients was 341±293 days (11.4±9.8 months), with the longest follow-up being 6.4 years. Patients with Si3N4 implants were similar in gender and age distribution to the control group but had higher BMI values (30.9±6.1 vs. 25.8±4.1, P<0.01) and lower tobacco use (15.8% vs. 30.0%, P<0.01). Both the Si3N4 and control groups showed significant improvements in VAS pain scores from preoperative to last follow-up. For the Si3N4 group, ΔVAS was 36.8±35.4 points compared to 37.6±22.5 points (P=0.63) for the metadata group. Complications and reoperations for the Si3N4 and the control groups were similar (i.e., 9.8% and 3.1% versus 12.4% and 2.9%, P=0.16 and P=0.84, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar fusion with Si3N4 spacers compared favorably with the improvements reported with other commonly used biomaterial cages. 2020 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Lumbar discectomy and fusion; clinical outcomes; silicon nitride (Si3N4)
Authors: Ryan M Bock; Elia Marin; Alfredo Rondinella; Francesco Boschetto; Tetsuya Adachi; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal; Giuseppe Pezzotti Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: M Rickert; C Fleege; T Tarhan; S Schreiner; M R Makowski; M Rauschmann; M Arabmotlagh Journal: Bone Joint J Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 5.082
Authors: Ralph J Mobbs; Prashanth J Rao; Kevin Phan; Philip Hardcastle; Wen Jie Choy; Eric R McCartney; Ross K Druitt; Christopher A L Mouatt; Charles C Sorrell Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2018-09-08 Impact factor: 2.104