Literature DB >> 27627049

Predictive time-series modeling using artificial neural networks for Linac beam symmetry: an empirical study.

Qiongge Li1,2, Maria F Chan3.   

Abstract

Over half of cancer patients receive radiotherapy (RT) as partial or full cancer treatment. Daily quality assurance (QA) of RT in cancer treatment closely monitors the performance of the medical linear accelerator (Linac) and is critical for continuous improvement of patient safety and quality of care. Cumulative longitudinal QA measurements are valuable for understanding the behavior of the Linac and allow physicists to identify trends in the output and take preventive actions. In this study, artificial neural networks (ANNs) and autoregressive moving average (ARMA) time-series prediction modeling techniques were both applied to 5-year daily Linac QA data. Verification tests and other evaluations were then performed for all models. Preliminary results showed that ANN time-series predictive modeling has more advantages over ARMA techniques for accurate and effective applicability in the dosimetry and QA field.
© 2016 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANNs; ARMA; Linac QA; artificial neural networks; autoregressive moving average; predictive time-series analytics; radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27627049      PMCID: PMC5026311          DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  9 in total

1.  Quality control quantification (QCQ): a tool to measure the value of quality control checks in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Eric C Ford; Stephanie Terezakis; Annette Souranis; Kendra Harris; Hiram Gay; Sasa Mutic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Analysis of output trends from Varian 2100C/D and 600C/D accelerators.

Authors:  M W D Grattan; A R Hounsell
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A comparative study of autoregressive neural network hybrids.

Authors:  Tugba Taskaya-Temizel; Matthew C Casey
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul

4.  A mathematical framework for virtual IMRT QA using machine learning.

Authors:  G Valdes; R Scheuermann; C Y Hung; A Olszanski; M Bellerive; T D Solberg
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Quality assurance in radiotherapy: evaluation of errors and incidents recorded over a 10 year period.

Authors:  Tai Keung Yeung; Karen Bortolotto; Scott Cosby; Margaret Hoar; Ernst Lederer
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  The impact of new technologies on radiation oncology events and trends in the past decade: an institutional experience.

Authors:  Margie A Hunt; Gerri Pastrana; Howard I Amols; Aileen Killen; Kaled Alektiar
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Quality assurance of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: toward improvement of patient safety and quality of care.

Authors:  Satoshi Ishikura
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Output trends, characteristics, and measurements of three megavoltage radiotherapy linear accelerators.

Authors:  Murshed Hossain
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Visual Analysis of the Daily QA Results of Photon and Electron Beams of a Trilogy Linac over a Five-year Period.

Authors:  Maria F Chan; Qiongge Li; Xiaoli Tang; Xiang Li; Jingdong Li; Grace Tang; Margie A Hunt; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Int J Med Phys Clin Eng Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-11-09
  9 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Elizabeth Huynh; Ahmed Hosny; Christian Guthier; Danielle S Bitterman; Steven F Petit; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Benjamin Kann; Hugo J W L Aerts; Raymond H Mak
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence: reshaping the practice of radiological sciences in the 21st century.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Masoom A Haider; Maryellen L Giger; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Auto-Trending daily quality assurance program for a pencil beam scanning proton system aligned with TG 224.

Authors:  Chengyu Shi; Qing Chen; Francis Yu; Jingqiao Zhang; Minglei Kang; Shikui Tang; Chang Chang; Haibo Lin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Machine learning and modeling: Data, validation, communication challenges.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Dan Ruan; Gilmer Valdes; Andre Dekker; Todd McNutt; Yaorong Ge; Q Jackie Wu; Jung Hun Oh; Maria Thor; Wade Smith; Arvind Rao; Clifton Fuller; Ying Xiao; Frank Manion; Matthew Schipper; Charles Mayo; Jean M Moran; Randall Ten Haken
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  IMRT QA using machine learning: A multi-institutional validation.

Authors:  Gilmer Valdes; Maria F Chan; Seng Boh Lim; Ryan Scheuermann; Joseph O Deasy; Timothy D Solberg
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 6.  Integration of AI and Machine Learning in Radiotherapy QA.

Authors:  Maria F Chan; Alon Witztum; Gilmer Valdes
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2020-09-29

7.  Utilization of Time Series Tools in Life-sciences and Neuroscience.

Authors:  Harshit Gujral; Ajay Kumar Kushwaha; Sukant Khurana
Journal:  Neurosci Insights       Date:  2020-12-08

8.  Machine learning techniques to detect and forecast the daily total COVID-19 infected and deaths cases under different lockdown types.

Authors:  Tanzila Saba; Ibrahim Abunadi; Mirza Naveed Shahzad; Amjad Rehman Khan
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.893

9.  Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology: Opportunities, Requirements, and Needs.

Authors:  Mary Feng; Gilmer Valdes; Nayha Dixit; Timothy D Solberg
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Predictive quality assurance of a linear accelerator based on the machine performance check application using statistical process control and ARIMA forecast modeling.

Authors:  Wayo Puyati; Amnach Khawne; Michael Barnes; Benjamin Zwan; Peter Greer; Todsaporn Fuangrod
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.