Literature DB >> 33733216

Integration of AI and Machine Learning in Radiotherapy QA.

Maria F Chan1, Alon Witztum2, Gilmer Valdes2.   

Abstract

The use of machine learning and other sophisticated models to aid in prediction and decision making has become widely popular across a breadth of disciplines. Within the greater diagnostic radiology, radiation oncology, and medical physics communities promising work is being performed in tissue classification and cancer staging, outcome prediction, automated segmentation, treatment planning, and quality assurance as well as other areas. In this article, machine learning approaches are explored, highlighting specific applications in machine and patient-specific quality assurance (QA). Machine learning can analyze multiple elements of a delivery system on its performance over time including the multileaf collimator (MLC), imaging system, mechanical and dosimetric parameters. Virtual Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) QA can predict passing rates using different measurement techniques, different treatment planning systems, and different treatment delivery machines across multiple institutions. Prediction of QA passing rates and other metrics can have profound implications on the current IMRT process. Here we cover general concepts of machine learning in dosimetry and various methods used in virtual IMRT QA, as well as their clinical applications.
Copyright © 2020 Chan, Witztum and Valdes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IMRT; VMAT; artificial intelligence; machine learning; quality assurance; radiotherapy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33733216      PMCID: PMC7861232          DOI: 10.3389/frai.2020.577620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Artif Intell        ISSN: 2624-8212


  25 in total

1.  Prediction of dosimetric accuracy for VMAT plans using plan complexity parameters via machine learning.

Authors:  Tomohiro Ono; Hideaki Hirashima; Hiraku Iramina; Nobutaka Mukumoto; Yuki Miyabe; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Takashi Mizowaki
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Predicting VMAT patient-specific QA results using a support vector classifier trained on treatment plan characteristics and linac QC metrics.

Authors:  Dal A Granville; Justin G Sutherland; Jason G Belec; Daniel J La Russa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Improvement of prediction and classification performance for gamma passing rate by using plan complexity and dosiomics features.

Authors:  Hideaki Hirashima; Tomohiro Ono; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Yuki Miyabe; Nobutaka Mukumoto; Hiraku Iramina; Takashi Mizowaki
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management.

Authors:  M Saiful Huq; Benedick A Fraass; Peter B Dunscombe; John P Gibbons; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Arno J Mundt; Sasa Mutic; Jatinder R Palta; Frank Rath; Bruce R Thomadsen; Jeffrey F Williamson; Ellen D Yorke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Beam data modeling of linear accelerators (linacs) through machine learning and its potential applications in fast and robust linac commissioning and quality assurance.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Ishan Patil; Bin Han; Yong Yang; Lei Xing; Emil Schüler
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Towards real-time respiratory motion prediction based on long short-term memory neural networks.

Authors:  Hui Lin; Chengyu Shi; Brian Wang; Maria F Chan; Xiaoli Tang; Wei Ji
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Predictive time-series modeling using artificial neural networks for Linac beam symmetry: an empirical study.

Authors:  Qiongge Li; Maria F Chan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology: Opportunities, Requirements, and Needs.

Authors:  Mary Feng; Gilmer Valdes; Nayha Dixit; Timothy D Solberg
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Prediction of the output factor using machine and deep learning approach in uniform scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Hardev S Grewal; Michael S Chacko; Salahuddin Ahmad; Hosang Jin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Building more accurate decision trees with the additive tree.

Authors:  José Marcio Luna; Efstathios D Gennatas; Lyle H Ungar; Eric Eaton; Eric S Diffenderfer; Shane T Jensen; Charles B Simone; Jerome H Friedman; Timothy D Solberg; Gilmer Valdes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Commissioning and clinical implementation of an Autoencoder based Classification-Regression model for VMAT patient-specific QA in a multi-institution scenario.

Authors:  Ruijie Yang; Xueying Yang; Le Wang; Dingjie Li; Yuexin Guo; Ying Li; Yumin Guan; Xiangyang Wu; Shouping Xu; Shuming Zhang; Maria F Chan; Lisheng Geng; Jing Sui
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 6.901

2.  Machine learning for dose-volume histogram based clinical decision-making support system in radiation therapy plans for brain tumors.

Authors:  Pawel Siciarz; Salem Alfaifi; Eric Van Uytven; Shrinivas Rathod; Rashmi Koul; Boyd McCurdy
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-09-15

3.  Assessment of efficacy in automated plan generation for Varian Ethos intelligent optimization engine.

Authors:  Shyam Pokharel; Abilio Pacheco; Suzanne Tanner
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Knowledge Graph Applications in Medical Imaging Analysis: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Song Wang; Mingquan Lin; Tirthankar Ghosal; Ying Ding; Yifan Peng
Journal:  Health Data Sci       Date:  2022-06-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.