Arunark Kolipaka1,2, Venkata Sita Priyanka Illapani1,3, Prateek Kalra1, Julio Garcia4, Xiaokui Mo5, Michael Markl4,6, Richard D White1,2. 1. Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 2. Department of Internal Medicine-Division of Cardiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 5. Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 6. Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Aortic wall shear stress (WSSFlow ) alters endothelial function, which in-turn changes aortic wall stiffness leading to remodeling in different disease states. Therefore, the aims of this study are to determine normal physiologic correlations between: (1) Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE)-derived aortic wall stiffness (WSMRE ) and WSSFlow ; (2) WSMRE and mean velocity; (3) WSMRE and pulse wave velocity (PWV);( 4) WSMRE and mean peak flow; and (5) WSMRE , WSSFlow and age using MRE and 4D-flow MRI in the abdominal aorta in healthy human subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cardiac-gated aortic MRE and 4D-flow MRI data were acquired in 24 healthy volunteers using a 3 Tesla scanner. For MRE, 70 Hz external motion was applied to obtain wave images in all spatial directions in a separate breathhold. Whereas, 4D-flow data was acquired under free-breathing. Wave images in all the directions were processed to obtain three-dimensional-weighted stiffness map at end-systole (ES). WSSFlow , mean velocity, PWV and mean peak flow were obtained using 4D-flow data. Pearson correlation was performed to determine association between all variables. RESULTS: A significant negative correlation was observed between: (1) ES WSMRE and WSSFlow in both axial (r = -0.62; P = 0.006) and circumferential (r = -0.52; P = 0.016) directions; (2) ES WSMRE and mean velocity (r = -0.58; P = 0.012); and (3) age and WSSFlow in both axial (r = -0.71; P < 0.0001) and circumferential (r = -0.58; P = 0.0012) directions. A significant positive correlation was observed between: (1) ES WSMRE and PWV (r = 0.69; P < 0.0001); (2) ES WSMRE and mean peak flow (r = 0.53; P = 0.016); and (3) ES WSMRE and age (r = 0.63;P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The negative significant correlation between aortic WSSFlow and WSMRE in normal volunteers demonstrates a relationship between WSMRE and WSSFlow . LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:771-778.
PURPOSE: Aortic wall shear stress (WSSFlow ) alters endothelial function, which in-turn changes aortic wall stiffness leading to remodeling in different disease states. Therefore, the aims of this study are to determine normal physiologic correlations between: (1) Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE)-derived aortic wall stiffness (WSMRE ) and WSSFlow ; (2) WSMRE and mean velocity; (3) WSMRE and pulse wave velocity (PWV);( 4) WSMRE and mean peak flow; and (5) WSMRE , WSSFlow and age using MRE and 4D-flow MRI in the abdominal aorta in healthy human subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cardiac-gated aortic MRE and 4D-flow MRI data were acquired in 24 healthy volunteers using a 3 Tesla scanner. For MRE, 70 Hz external motion was applied to obtain wave images in all spatial directions in a separate breathhold. Whereas, 4D-flow data was acquired under free-breathing. Wave images in all the directions were processed to obtain three-dimensional-weighted stiffness map at end-systole (ES). WSSFlow , mean velocity, PWV and mean peak flow were obtained using 4D-flow data. Pearson correlation was performed to determine association between all variables. RESULTS: A significant negative correlation was observed between: (1) ES WSMRE and WSSFlow in both axial (r = -0.62; P = 0.006) and circumferential (r = -0.52; P = 0.016) directions; (2) ES WSMRE and mean velocity (r = -0.58; P = 0.012); and (3) age and WSSFlow in both axial (r = -0.71; P < 0.0001) and circumferential (r = -0.58; P = 0.0012) directions. A significant positive correlation was observed between: (1) ES WSMRE and PWV (r = 0.69; P < 0.0001); (2) ES WSMRE and mean peak flow (r = 0.53; P = 0.016); and (3) ES WSMRE and age (r = 0.63;P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The negative significant correlation between aortic WSSFlow and WSMRE in normal volunteers demonstrates a relationship between WSMRE and WSSFlow . LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:771-778.
Authors: Arunark Kolipaka; Shivani R Aggarwal; Kiaran P McGee; Nandan Anavekar; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; Philip A Araoz Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Andreas Harloff; Andrea Nussbaumer; Simon Bauer; Aurélien F Stalder; Alex Frydrychowicz; Cornelius Weiller; Jürgen Hennig; Michael Markl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Peter A Wassenaar; Chethanya N Eleswarpu; Samuel A Schroeder; Xiaokui Mo; Brian D Raterman; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Eileen Hwuang; Marta Vidorreta; Nadav Schwartz; Brianna F Moon; Kirpal Kochar; Matthew Dylan Tisdall; John A Detre; Walter R T Witschey Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2018-11-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Emilie Bollache; Kristopher D Knott; Kelly Jarvis; Redha Boubertakh; Ryan Scott Dolan; Claudia Camaioni; Louise Collins; Paul Scully; Sydney Rabin; Thomas Treibel; James C Carr; Pim van Ooij; Jeremy D Collins; Julia Geiger; James C Moon; Alex J Barker; Steffen E Petersen; Michael Markl Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2019-06-27
Authors: Huiming Dong; Brian Raterman; Richard D White; Jean Starr; Patrick Vaccaro; Mounir Haurani; Michael Go; Mariah Eisner; Guy Brock; Arunark Kolipaka Journal: Radiology Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 29.146
Authors: Thekla H Oechtering; Grant S Roberts; Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos; Oliver Wieben; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Scott B Reeder Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2021-11-27
Authors: Huiming Dong; Duncan S Russell; Alan S Litsky; Matthew E Joseph; Xiaokui Mo; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 10.065
Authors: Jonathan R Weir-McCall; Matthew Lambert; Stephen J Gandy; Jill J F Belch; Ian Cavin; Shelley A Henderson; Roberta Littleford; Jennifer A Macfarlane; Shona Z Matthew; R Stephen Nicholas; Allan D Struthers; Frank Sullivan; Richard D White; J Graeme Houston Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 5.364