MR Elastography of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Relationship to Aneurysm Events.

Background Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter remains the standard clinical parameter to predict growth and rupture. Studies suggest that using solely AAA diameter for risk stratification is insufficient. Purpose To evaluate the use of aortic MR elastography (MRE)-derived AAA stiffness and stiffness ratio at baseline to identify the potential for future aneurysm rupture or need for surgical repair. Materials and Methods Between August 2013 and March 2019, 72 participants with AAA and 56 healthy participants were enrolled in this prospective study. MRE examinations were performed to estimate AAA stiffness and the stiffness ratio between AAA and its adjacent remote normal aorta. Two Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess AAA stiffness and stiffness ratio for predicting aneurysmal events (subsequent repair, rupture, or diameter >5.0 cm). Log-rank tests were performed to determine a critical stiffness ratio suggesting high-risk AAAs. Baseline AAA stiffness and stiffness ratio were studied using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests between participants with and without aneurysmal events. Spearman correlation was used to investigate the relationship between stiffness and other potential imaging markers. Results Seventy-two participants with AAA (mean age, 71 years ± 9 [SD]; 56 men and 16 women) and 56 healthy participants (mean age, 42 years ± 16; 27 men and 29 women) were evaluated. In healthy participants, aortic stiffness positively correlated with age (ρ = 0.44; P < .001). AAA stiffness (event group [n = 21], 50.3 kPa ± 26.5 [SD]; no-event group [n = 21], 86.9 kPa ± 52.6; P = .01) and the stiffness ratio (event group, 0.7 ± 0.4; no-event group, 2.0 ± 1.4; P < .001) were lower in the event group than the no-event group at a mean follow-up of 449 days. AAA stiffness did not correlate with diameter in the event group (ρ = -0.06; P = .68) or the no-event group (ρ = -0.13; P = .32). AAA stiffness was inversely correlated with intraluminal thrombus area (ρ = -0.50; P = .01). Conclusion Lower abdominal aortic aneurysm stiffness and stiffness ratio measured with use of MR elastography was associated with aneurysmal events at a 15-month follow-up. © RSNA, 2022 See also the editorial by Sakuma in this issue.