David H Epstein1, Ashley P Kennedy2, Melody Furnari2, Markus Heilig2, Yavin Shaham2, Karran A Phillips2, Kenzie L Preston2. 1. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, 251 Bayview Blvd., BRC Building, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA. depstein@intra.nida.nih.gov. 2. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, 251 Bayview Blvd., BRC Building, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE: In rodents, antagonism of receptors for corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) blocks stress-induced reinstatement of drug or palatable food seeking. OBJECTIVE: To test anticraving properties of the CRF1 antagonist pexacerfont in humans. METHODS: We studied stress-induced eating in people scoring high on dietary restraint (food preoccupation and chronic unsuccessful dieting) with body-mass index (BMI) >22. In a double-blind, between-groups trial, 31 "restrained" eaters were stabilized on either pexacerfont (300 mg/day for 7 days, then 100 mg/day for 21 days) or placebo. On day 15, they underwent a math-test stressor; during three subsequent visits, they heard personalized craving-induction scripts. In each session, stress-induced food consumption and craving were assessed in a bogus taste test and on visual analog scales. We used digital video to monitor daily ingestion of study capsules and nightly rating of food problems/preoccupation on the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS). RESULTS: The study was stopped early due to an administrative interpretation of US federal law, unrelated to safety or outcome. The bogus taste tests suggested some protective effect of pexacerfont against eating after a laboratory stressor (r effect = 0.30, 95 % CL = -0.12, 0.63, Bayes factor 11.30). Similarly, nightly YFAS ratings were lower with pexacerfont than placebo (r effect = 0.39, CI 0.03, 0.66), but this effect should be interpreted with caution because it was present from the first night of pill ingestion, despite pexacerfont's slow pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: The findings may support further investigation of the anticraving properties of CRF1 antagonists, especially for food.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: In rodents, antagonism of receptors for corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) blocks stress-induced reinstatement of drug or palatable food seeking. OBJECTIVE: To test anticraving properties of the CRF1 antagonist pexacerfont in humans. METHODS: We studied stress-induced eating in people scoring high on dietary restraint (food preoccupation and chronic unsuccessful dieting) with body-mass index (BMI) >22. In a double-blind, between-groups trial, 31 "restrained" eaters were stabilized on either pexacerfont (300 mg/day for 7 days, then 100 mg/day for 21 days) or placebo. On day 15, they underwent a math-test stressor; during three subsequent visits, they heard personalized craving-induction scripts. In each session, stress-induced food consumption and craving were assessed in a bogus taste test and on visual analog scales. We used digital video to monitor daily ingestion of study capsules and nightly rating of food problems/preoccupation on the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS). RESULTS: The study was stopped early due to an administrative interpretation of US federal law, unrelated to safety or outcome. The bogus taste tests suggested some protective effect of pexacerfont against eating after a laboratory stressor (r effect = 0.30, 95 % CL = -0.12, 0.63, Bayes factor 11.30). Similarly, nightly YFAS ratings were lower with pexacerfont than placebo (r effect = 0.39, CI 0.03, 0.66), but this effect should be interpreted with caution because it was present from the first night of pill ingestion, despite pexacerfont's slow pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: The findings may support further investigation of the anticraving properties of CRF1 antagonists, especially for food.
Authors: Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò Journal: Nat Rev Neurosci Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 34.870
Authors: Heike E Künzel; Astrid W Zobel; Thomas Nickel; Nibal Ackl; Manfred Uhr; Annette Sonntag; Marcus Ising; Florian Holsboer Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2003 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Maria Vittoria Micioni Di Bonaventura; Massimo Ubaldi; Maria Elena Giusepponi; Kenner C Rice; Maurizio Massi; Roberto Ciccocioppo; Carlo Cifani Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Catherine F Moore; Julia I Panciera; Valentina Sabino; Pietro Cottone Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 6.237