Literature DB >> 12880616

The specificity of restrained versus unrestrained eaters' responses to food cues: general desire to eat, or craving for the cued food?

Ingrid Fedoroff1, Janet Polivy, C Peter Herman.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that exposure to food cues increases eating, especially in restrained eaters. The present study attempted to determine whether this elevated consumption reflects a general desire to eat in response to food cues, or specific desire/craving for the cued food. Restrained and unrestrained eaters were exposed to the smell of either pizza, cookies, or no smell for 10 minutes, were asked to write their thoughts (corresponding to the smell cue) about pizza, cookies or in general, and were then presented with either pizza or cookies to 'taste and rate'. Results indicated that restrained eaters are more responsive than are unrestrained eaters to pre-eating exposure to smell and thought cues, eating significantly more after such cues. An interaction with food type, however, indicated that restrained eaters ate more only when the food presented to eat was the same as the prior food cues. Self-reported desire to eat, liking, and craving for a particular food increased somewhat for restrained eaters after exposure to the smell and thought of that food. Restrained eaters' intake of a food that differed from the pre-eating food cues did not differ from their intake following no prior exposure to food cues. Restrained eaters thus showed a highly specific response to exposure to food cues.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12880616     DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00026-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  59 in total

1.  The future is now: reducing impulsivity and energy intake using episodic future thinking.

Authors:  Tinuke Oluyomi Daniel; Christina M Stanton; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-09-10

Review 2.  A neural systems analysis of the potentiation of feeding by conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Gorica D Petrovich
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-10-25

3.  Learned contextual cue potentiates eating in rats.

Authors:  Gorica D Petrovich; Cali A Ross; Michela Gallagher; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-10-31

4.  Topiramate-induced weight loss is possibly due to the blockade of conditioned and automatic processes.

Authors:  Yasser Khazaal; Daniele Fabio Zullino
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Control of food consumption by learned cues: a forebrain-hypothalamic network.

Authors:  Gorica D Petrovich; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-04-19

6.  Differential effects of the hypocretin 1 receptor antagonist SB 334867 on high-fat food self-administration and reinstatement of food seeking in rats.

Authors:  S G Nair; S A Golden; Y Shaham
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Odors: appetizing or satiating? Development of appetite during odor exposure over time.

Authors:  M G Ramaekers; S Boesveldt; C M M Lakemond; M A J S van Boekel; P A Luning
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  Imaging of brain dopamine pathways: implications for understanding obesity.

Authors:  Gene-Jack Wang; Nora D Volkow; Panayotis K Thanos; Joanna S Fowler
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.702

9.  Correlation between Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Activation to Food Aromas and Cue-driven Eating: An fMRI Study.

Authors:  William J A Eiler; Mario Dzemidzic; K Rose Case; Robert V Considine; David A Kareken
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 1.833

10.  Sweetened drink and snacking cues in adolescents: a study using ecological momentary assessment.

Authors:  Jerry L Grenard; Alan W Stacy; Saul Shiffman; Amanda N Baraldi; David P MacKinnon; Ginger Lockhart; Yasemin Kisbu-Sakarya; Sarah Boyle; Yuliyana Beleva; Carol Koprowski; Susan L Ames; Kim D Reynolds
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.