J Wardle1, A Steptoe, G Oliver, Z Lipsey. 1. ICRF Health Behaviour Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK. j.wardle@ucl.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between work stress and nutritional status in relation to dietary restraint in a community sample of adults. METHODS: The design included a cross-sectional and a longitudinal study element. Ninety staff members (58 women and 32 men) of a large department store were assessed on four occasions over a 6-month period with measures of diet, weight, and perceived stress. Work stress was indexed in terms of the hours of work over the past 7 days, which provided an objective indicator of demand. RESULTS: Participants worked an average of 47 hours on the high-work-stress session compared with 32 hours on the low-work-stress session. The highest work-stress session was compared with the lowest work-stress session in the longitudinal analyses, and the moderating effects of gender and restrained eating were examined. High-workload periods were associated with higher energy and saturated fat and sugar intake. There was a significant moderating effect of restrained eating, with a hyperphagic response to work stress in restrained eaters, compared with no effect in unrestrained eaters. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the associations between restraint and stress-induced eating that have been observed in the laboratory extend to the real-life setting. They raise the possibility that restrained eaters are particularly vulnerable to adverse effects of stress on health, through influences on food intake.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between work stress and nutritional status in relation to dietary restraint in a community sample of adults. METHODS: The design included a cross-sectional and a longitudinal study element. Ninety staff members (58 women and 32 men) of a large department store were assessed on four occasions over a 6-month period with measures of diet, weight, and perceived stress. Work stress was indexed in terms of the hours of work over the past 7 days, which provided an objective indicator of demand. RESULTS:Participants worked an average of 47 hours on the high-work-stress session compared with 32 hours on the low-work-stress session. The highest work-stress session was compared with the lowest work-stress session in the longitudinal analyses, and the moderating effects of gender and restrained eating were examined. High-workload periods were associated with higher energy and saturated fat and sugar intake. There was a significant moderating effect of restrained eating, with a hyperphagic response to work stress in restrained eaters, compared with no effect in unrestrained eaters. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the associations between restraint and stress-induced eating that have been observed in the laboratory extend to the real-life setting. They raise the possibility that restrained eaters are particularly vulnerable to adverse effects of stress on health, through influences on food intake.
Authors: Yvonne M Ulrich-Lai; Anne M Christiansen; Michelle M Ostrander; Amanda A Jones; Kenneth R Jones; Dennis C Choi; Eric G Krause; Nathan K Evanson; Amy R Furay; Jon F Davis; Matia B Solomon; Annette D de Kloet; Kellie L Tamashiro; Randall R Sakai; Randy J Seeley; Stephen C Woods; James P Herman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Shelby L Langer; Andrew P Flood; Ericka M Welsh; Rona L Levy; Melanie A Jaeb; Patricia S Laqua; Anne Marie Hotop; Nathan R Mitchell; Robert W Jeffery Journal: Internet J Ment Health Date: 2009
Authors: James R Hébert; Kathryn L Braun; Joseph Keawe'aimoku Kaholokula; Cheryl A Armstead; James B Burch; Beti Thompson Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2015
Authors: T R Castañeda; R Nogueiras; T D Müller; R Krishna; E Grant; A Jones; N Ottaway; G Ananthakrishnan; P T Pfluger; N Chaudhary; M B Solomon; S C Woods; J P Herman; M H Tschöp Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Carmen R Isasi; Christina M Parrinello; Molly M Jung; Mercedes R Carnethon; Orit Birnbaum-Weitzman; Rebeca A Espinoza; Frank J Penedo; Krista M Perreira; Neil Schneiderman; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Linda Van Horn; Linda C Gallo Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 3.797