Literature DB >> 27586778

Cochlear hearing loss and the detection of sinusoidal versus random amplitude modulation.

John H Grose1, Heather L Porter2, Emily Buss1, Joseph W Hall1.   

Abstract

This study assessed the effect of cochlear hearing loss on detection of random and sinusoidal amplitude modulation. Listeners with hearing loss and normal-hearing listeners (eight per group) generated temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) for envelope fluctuations carried by a 2000-Hz pure tone. TMTFs for the two groups were similar at low modulation rates but diverged at higher rates presumably because of differences in frequency selectivity. For both groups, detection of random modulation was poorer than for sinusoidal modulation at lower rates but the reverse occurred at higher rates. No evidence was found that cochlear hearing loss, per se, affects modulation detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27586778      PMCID: PMC5392087          DOI: 10.1121/1.4960075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Modulation rate detection and discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  K W Grant; V Summers; M R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Gap detection as a function of stimulus bandwidth with fixed high-frequency cutoff in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  J H Grose; D A Eddins; J W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Modulation detection interference using random and sinusoidal amplitude modulation.

Authors:  L Mendoza; J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Modulation masking within and across carriers for subjects with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Aleksander Sek; Thomas Baer; William Crinnion; Alastair Springgay; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Gap detection and temporal modulation transfer function as behavioral estimates of auditory temporal acuity using band-limited stimuli in young and older adults.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 10.  Cochlear compression: perceptual measures and implications for normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.