Literature DB >> 25087722

Gap detection and temporal modulation transfer function as behavioral estimates of auditory temporal acuity using band-limited stimuli in young and older adults.

Yi Shen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gap detection and the temporal modulation transfer function (TMTF) are 2 common methods to obtain behavioral estimates of auditory temporal acuity. However, the agreement between the 2 measures is not clear. This study compares results from these 2 methods and their dependencies on listener age and hearing status.
METHOD: Gap detection thresholds and the parameters that describe the TMTF (sensitivity and cutoff frequency) were estimated for young and older listeners who were naive to the experimental tasks. Stimuli were 800-Hz-wide noises with upper frequency limits of 2400 Hz, presented at 85 dB SPL. A 2-track procedure (Shen & Richards, 2013) was used for the efficient estimation of the TMTF.
RESULTS: No significant correlation was found between gap detection threshold and the sensitivity or the cutoff frequency of the TMTF. No significant effect of age and hearing loss on either the gap detection threshold or the TMTF cutoff frequency was found, while the TMTF sensitivity improved with increasing hearing threshold and worsened with increasing age.
CONCLUSION: Estimates of temporal acuity using gap detection and TMTF paradigms do not seem to provide a consistent description of the effects of listener age and hearing status on temporal envelope processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25087722      PMCID: PMC4372392          DOI: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  48 in total

1.  Temporal resolution in young and elderly subjects as measured by mismatch negativity and a psychoacoustic gap detection task.

Authors:  Sibylle Bertoli; Jacek Smurzynski; Rudolf Probst
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Word recognition in competing babble and the effects of age, temporal processing, and absolute sensitivity.

Authors:  Karen B Snell; Frances M Mapes; Elizabeth D Hickman; D Robert Frisina
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The detection of temporal gaps as a function of frequency region and absolute noise bandwidth.

Authors:  D A Eddins; J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners.

Authors:  Erwin L J George; Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; S Theo Goverts; Joost M Festen; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Modulation rate detection and discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  K W Grant; V Summers; M R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.

Authors:  Su-Hyun Jin; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: narrow-band stimuli.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lister; Richard A Roberts
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Temporal acuity in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  R J Irwin; L K Hinchcliff; S Kemp
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1981

10.  Monaural level discrimination under dichotic conditions.

Authors:  Daniel E Shub; Nathaniel I Durlach; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cochlear hearing loss and the detection of sinusoidal versus random amplitude modulation.

Authors:  John H Grose; Heather L Porter; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Identification of the Spectrotemporal Modulations That Support Speech Intelligibility in Hearing-Impaired and Normal-Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Jonathan H Venezia; Allison-Graham Martin; Gregory Hickok; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Large cross-sectional study of presbycusis reveals rapid progressive decline in auditory temporal acuity.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; Ann C Eddins; D Robert Frisina; David A Eddins
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.673

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.