Literature DB >> 27581877

Interactions between demography, genetics, and landscape connectivity increase extinction probability for a small population of large carnivores in a major metropolitan area.

John F Benson1, Peter J Mahoney2, Jeff A Sikich3, Laurel E K Serieys4, John P Pollinger5, Holly B Ernest6, Seth P D Riley7.   

Abstract

The extinction vortex is a theoretical model describing the process by which extinction risk is elevated in small, isolated populations owing to interactions between environmental, demographic, and genetic factors. However, empirical demonstrations of these interactions have been elusive. We modelled the dynamics of a small mountain lion population isolated by anthropogenic barriers in greater Los Angeles, California, to evaluate the influence of demographic, genetic, and landscape factors on extinction probability. The population exhibited strong survival and reproduction, and the model predicted stable median population growth and a 15% probability of extinction over 50 years in the absence of inbreeding depression. However, our model also predicted the population will lose 40-57% of its heterozygosity in 50 years. When we reduced demographic parameters proportional to reductions documented in another wild population of mountain lions that experienced inbreeding depression, extinction probability rose to 99.7%. Simulating greater landscape connectivity by increasing immigration to greater than or equal to one migrant per generation appears sufficient to largely maintain genetic diversity and reduce extinction probability. We provide empirical support for the central tenet of the extinction vortex as interactions between genetics and demography greatly increased extinction probability relative to the risk from demographic and environmental stochasticity alone. Our modelling approach realistically integrates demographic and genetic data to provide a comprehensive assessment of factors threatening small populations.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  PVA; Puma concolor; demographic stochasticity; heterozygosity; immigration; inbreeding depression

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27581877      PMCID: PMC5013791          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  20 in total

1.  The influence of variable rates of inbreeding on fitness, environmental responsiveness, and evolutionary potential.

Authors:  Stacey B Day; Edwin H Bryant; Lisa M Meffert
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  A southern California freeway is a physical and social barrier to gene flow in carnivores.

Authors:  Seth P D Riley; John P Pollinger; Raymond M Sauvajot; Eric C York; Cassity Bromley; Todd K Fuller; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Quantifying the extinction vortex.

Authors:  William F Fagan; E E Holmes
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 4.  Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores.

Authors:  William J Ripple; James A Estes; Robert L Beschta; Christopher C Wilmers; Euan G Ritchie; Mark Hebblewhite; Joel Berger; Bodil Elmhagen; Mike Letnic; Michael P Nelson; Oswald J Schmitz; Douglas W Smith; Arian D Wallach; Aaron J Wirsing
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Ecological and genetic factors in conservation: a cautionary tale.

Authors:  T M Caro; M K Laurenson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Genetic Introgression and the Survival of Florida Panther Kittens.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Hostetler; David P Onorato; James D Nichols; Warren E Johnson; Melody E Roelke; Stephen J O'Brien; Deborah Jansen; Madan K Oli
Journal:  Biol Conserv       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.990

7.  Intentional genetic introgression influences survival of adults and subadults in a small, inbred felid population.

Authors:  John F Benson; Jeffrey A Hostetler; David P Onorato; Warren E Johnson; Melody E Roelke; Stephen J O'Brien; Deborah Jansen; Madan K Oli
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Trapped in the extinction vortex? Strong genetic effects in a declining vertebrate population.

Authors:  Donald Blomqvist; Angela Pauliny; Mikael Larsson; Lars-Ake Flodin
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Survival and Mortality of Pumas (Puma concolor) in a Fragmented, Urbanizing Landscape.

Authors:  T Winston Vickers; Jessica N Sanchez; Christine K Johnson; Scott A Morrison; Randy Botta; Trish Smith; Brian S Cohen; Patrick R Huber; Holly B Ernest; Walter M Boyce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fractured genetic connectivity threatens a southern california puma (Puma concolor) population.

Authors:  Holly B Ernest; T Winston Vickers; Scott A Morrison; Michael R Buchalski; Walter M Boyce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Multi-population puma connectivity could restore genomic diversity to at-risk coastal populations in California.

Authors:  Kyle D Gustafson; Roderick B Gagne; Michael R Buchalski; T Winston Vickers; Seth P D Riley; Jeff A Sikich; Jaime L Rudd; Justin A Dellinger; Melanie E F LaCava; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.183

2.  Simulations indicate that scores of lionfish (Pterois volitans) colonized the Atlantic Ocean.

Authors:  Jason D Selwyn; John E Johnson; Alan M Downey-Wall; Adam M Bynum; Rebecca M Hamner; J Derek Hogan; Christopher E Bird
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  A single migrant enhances the genetic diversity of an inbred puma population.

Authors:  Kyle D Gustafson; T Winston Vickers; Walter M Boyce; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Severe consequences of habitat fragmentation on genetic diversity of an endangered Australian freshwater fish: A call for assisted gene flow.

Authors:  Alexandra Pavlova; Luciano B Beheregaray; Rhys Coleman; Dean Gilligan; Katherine A Harrisson; Brett A Ingram; Joanne Kearns; Annika M Lamb; Mark Lintermans; Jarod Lyon; Thuy T T Nguyen; Minami Sasaki; Zeb Tonkin; Jian D L Yen; Paul Sunnucks
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Improving estimation of puma (Puma concolor) population density: clustered camera-trapping, telemetry data, and generalized spatial mark-resight models.

Authors:  Sean M Murphy; David T Wilckens; Ben C Augustine; Mark A Peyton; Glenn C Harper
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Testing the effectiveness of genetic monitoring using genetic non-invasive sampling.

Authors:  Anthony James Schultz; Kasha Strickland; Romane H Cristescu; Jonathan Hanger; Deidre de Villiers; Céline H Frère
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Multi-level, multi-scale resource selection functions and resistance surfaces for conservation planning: Pumas as a case study.

Authors:  Katherine A Zeller; T Winston Vickers; Holly B Ernest; Walter M Boyce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Measures of effective population size in sea otters reveal special considerations for wide-ranging species.

Authors:  Roderick B Gagne; M Timothy Tinker; Kyle D Gustafson; Katherine Ralls; Shawn Larson; L Max Tarjan; Melissa A Miller; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.183

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.