Literature DB >> 35233248

Multi-population puma connectivity could restore genomic diversity to at-risk coastal populations in California.

Kyle D Gustafson1, Roderick B Gagne2, Michael R Buchalski3, T Winston Vickers4, Seth P D Riley5, Jeff A Sikich5, Jaime L Rudd3, Justin A Dellinger3, Melanie E F LaCava6, Holly B Ernest6.   

Abstract

Urbanization is decreasing wildlife habitat and connectivity worldwide, including for apex predators, such as the puma (Puma concolor). Puma populations along California's central and southern coastal habitats have experienced rapid fragmentation from development, leading to calls for demographic and genetic management. To address urgent conservation genomic concerns, we used double-digest restriction-site associated DNA (ddRAD) sequencing to analyze 16,285 genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 401 pumas sampled broadly across the state. Our analyses indicated support for 4-10 geographically nested, broad- to fine-scale genetic clusters. At the broadest scale, the four genetic clusters had high genetic diversity and exhibited low linkage disequilibrium, indicating that pumas have retained genomic diversity statewide. However, multiple lines of evidence indicated substructure, including 10 finer-scale genetic clusters, some of which exhibited fixed alleles and linkage disequilibrium. Fragmented populations along the Southern Coast and Central Coast had particularly low genetic diversity and strong linkage disequilibrium, indicating genetic drift and close inbreeding. Our results demonstrate that genetically at risk populations are typically nested within a broader-scale group of interconnected populations that collectively retain high genetic diversity and heterogenous fixations. Thus, extant variation at the broader scale has potential to restore diversity to local populations if management actions can enhance vital gene flow and recombine locally sequestered genetic diversity. These state- and genome-wide results are critically important for science-based conservation and management practices. Our nested population genomic analysis highlights the information that can be gained from population genomic studies aiming to provide guidance for the conservation of fragmented populations.
© 2021 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Puma concolor; SNP; conservation genetics; mountain lion; nested population structure; population genetics

Year:  2022        PMID: 35233248      PMCID: PMC8867711          DOI: 10.1111/eva.13341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Appl        ISSN: 1752-4571            Impact factor:   5.183


  39 in total

1.  NeEstimator v2: re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne ) from genetic data.

Authors:  C Do; R S Waples; D Peel; G M Macbeth; B J Tillett; J R Ovenden
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 7.090

2.  adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers.

Authors:  Thibaut Jombart
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Environment. Sustainable development of the agricultural bio-economy.

Authors:  N Jordan; G Boody; W Broussard; J D Glover; D Keeney; B H McCown; G McIsaac; M Muller; H Murray; J Neal; C Pansing; R E Turner; K Warner; D Wyse
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression.

Authors:  Richard Frankham; Jonathan D Ballou; Mark D B Eldridge; Robert C Lacy; Katherine Ralls; Michele R Dudash; Charles B Fenster
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 5.  Whole-genome sequencing approaches for conservation biology: Advantages, limitations and practical recommendations.

Authors:  Angela P Fuentes-Pardo; Daniel E Ruzzante
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Interactions between demography, genetics, and landscape connectivity increase extinction probability for a small population of large carnivores in a major metropolitan area.

Authors:  John F Benson; Peter J Mahoney; Jeff A Sikich; Laurel E K Serieys; John P Pollinger; Holly B Ernest; Seth P D Riley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Habitat barriers limit gene flow and illuminate historical events in a wide-ranging carnivore, the American puma.

Authors:  B H McRae; P Beier; L E Dewald; L Y Huynh; P Keim
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Win-win for wind and wildlife: a vision to facilitate sustainable development.

Authors:  Joseph M Kiesecker; Jeffrey S Evans; Joe Fargione; Kevin Doherty; Kerry R Foresman; Thomas H Kunz; Dave Naugle; Nathan P Nibbelink; Neal D Niemuth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A single migrant enhances the genetic diversity of an inbred puma population.

Authors:  Kyle D Gustafson; T Winston Vickers; Walter M Boyce; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.